Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Aman Gupta vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Vaibhav Dhawan vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Sushant Rana vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Delhi Develpment Authority vs.the Ahluwalia Contracts India Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Order:07. 01.2019 + Tr. P. (C) No.152/2018 & C.M. No.33378/2018 DELHI DEVELPMENT AUTHORITY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate. Versus THE AHLUWALIA CONTRACTS INDIA LTD & ANR Through: Mr. S.K. Chandwani & Mr. Sameer Chandwani, Advocates for R-1. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 Mr. Chandwani, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1. Notice issued to respondent No.2 has not been served. It is submitted by both the learned counsel that respondent No.2 has been ex-parte before the trial court in Civil Suit No.959/2107. They also submit that respondent No.2 is not a party in Civil Suit No.427/2008. As such, issuance of notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with.2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has no objection if the Civil Suit No.959/2017 pending before the court of Sh. Sonu Agnihotri, learned Additional District Judge-02, South-East District, Saket Courts Co...
m.k.chabbra vs.damanjit Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % M.K.CHABBRA DAMANJIT KAUR RFA No.2/2019 07th January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dhatwalia, Ms. Iti Sharma and Mr. Jawahar Chawla, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaspal Singh and Ms. Namrah Nasir, Advocates (9650969579) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat No.5/2019 Counsel appears for the caveator. Caveat stands discharged. RFA No.2/2019 & CM No.77/2019 (Stay) & CM No.78/2019 (U/o XLI Rule 27 CPC) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit RFA No.2/2019 Page 1 of 30 impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 28.07.2018 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for specific performance of the Agreement to Sell dated 28.03.1993 with respect to the suit property bearing No.A-229, Shivalik, New Delhi...
Mohd. Yusuf @ Sufi Mohd. Hussain & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 29/2019 & Crl.M.As. 109-110/2019 MOHD. YUSUF @ SUFI MOHD. HUSSAIN & ORS. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaffar Hussain, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Pushpendra Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.77/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC registered at police station Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 9th January, 2018 (Annexure P-4).2. Upon notice, Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Pushpendra on the basis of identity proof produced by her.3. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has ...
Parmod Kumar Kaushik & Ors vs.uoi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
$~15 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10139/2009 PARMOD KUMAR KAUSHIK & ORS ........ Petitioners UOI & ORS + Through: Mr. H. S. Dahiya, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Advocate. And W.P.(C) 1415/2012 PRAMOD KUMAR KAUSHIK UOI AND ORS Through: None. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER0701.2019 SANJEEV NARULA, J: CM No.3069/2012 in W.P.(C) 1415/2012 1. By this application, the... Petitioners are seeking interim orders for further promotion of Respondent No.4 to the post of Assistant Commandants (Accounts Officer). In a similar application being CM No.855/2009 in W.P.(C) 10139/2009 & W.P.(C) 1415/2012 Page 1 of 16 WP(C) No.10139/2009, the... Petitioner had sought stay of the operation of seniority list dated 14th October, 2008. While disposing of the said application...
Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Co Pvt Ltd (Previously Known as Maharashtra Hy ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr R. Parthasarathy, Mr Anil Dutt, Mr Aditya Kaushik, Mr Sudarshan Singh Shekhawat. : MrArun Kumar and Mr Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates along with Mr Raj Ganesh, Legal Advisor and MsShaheen, Legal Assistant for R-2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 788/2017 Judgment delivered on:07. 01.2019 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEED CO PVT LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEEDS CO LTD) ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction The controversy that falls for consideration of this Court in this 1. petition relates to the levy of renewal fee in respect of registration of plant varieties. Rule 39 of the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights Rules, 2003 (hereafter the said Rules) provides for the renewal fee to be computed based on the average annual fee levied during the last registratio...
Director, Gail (India) Ltd. And Ors. Vs.shri Sri Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
$~18 to 25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6546/2014 & CM APPL. 15611/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner RAI SINGH + Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6547/2014 & CM APPL. 15613/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner JITENDER KUMAR + Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6871/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus SHRI JAI BHAGWAN + W.P.(C) 6874/2014 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. DIRECTOR, GAIL (INDIA) LTD. AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6546/2014 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 KALI RAM + versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6876/2014 DIRECTOR, GAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioners versus Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. SHRI SRI RAM + W.P.(C) 68...
Partha Sarathi Saha vs.assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + WP (C) 8466/2017 and CM No.34859/2017 Judgment reserved on :22. 09.2017 Date of decision :07. 01.2019 PARTHA SARATHI SAHA (Proprietor of M/s Sri Krishna Automobiles) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abheek Saha, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER .... Respondent Through: Mr. Satpal Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J.JUDGMENT1 The petitioner Mr. Partha Sarathi Saha, proprietor of M/s Sri Krishna Automobiles vide the present petition seeks the setting aside of the order dated 09.05.2017 of the Ld. Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in ATA No.480 (2) 2013 vide which the appeal ATA No.480 (2) 2013 filed by the petitioner herein against the order dated 01.07.2013 passed by the APFC, SRO, Agartala in Order No.NE/AGT/ENF/8209/7a/2012/13/3698 in proceedings under Section 7A of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous WP (C) 8466/2017 Page 1 of 22 Provisions Act, 1952 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- Next ›
- Last »