Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 76 of about 755 results (0.021 seconds)Fazal Ur Rehman vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:07. 01.2019 F.A.O. No.365/2018 FAZAL UR REHMAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.D. Ansari & Mr. I. Ahmed, Advocates with appellant in person. STATE & ANR Versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Yadav, Ms. Priyaranjan Dubey & Mr. Awanish Kumar, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL C.M. No.31125/2018 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. C.M. No.31124/2018 (for delay) There is delay of 34 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons justified in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of accordingly. F.A.O. No.365/2018 1. The order dated 26.02.2018 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge-06, Central District, Delhi, (ADJ) in Revocation No.02/2016 titled as Fazal-Ur-Rehman vs. State, F.A.O. No.365/2018 Page 1 of 2 dismissing the application of the appellant under Section 263 read with Sectio...
Tag this Judgment!Laxmi Narain @ Pappy & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 5033/2017 LAXMI NARAIN @ PAPPY & ORS Through: Mr. Mayank Mohan, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Ranbir Singh... RESPONDENTS No.2, 3 & 5 are present in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A.19884/2017 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.A.19885/2017 (delay) There is delay of 02 days in re-filing the accompanying petition. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the delay is condoned. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5033/2017 & Crl.M.A. 19883/2017 (stay) 1. Quashing of FIR No.209/2012, under Sections 323/3of IPC registered at police station Nangloi, Delhi is sought in this petition on the CRL.M.C. 5033/2017 Page 1 of 3 basis of Mediated Settlement of 3rd September, 2015 (Annexure P-2).2. Upon n...
Tag this Judgment!Sunair Hotels Ltd. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. 12.2018 Pronounced on:07. 01.2019 LPA3902017, C.M. APPL.19101/2017 & 32231/2017 SUNAIR HOTELS LTD. ...... Appellant Through: Sh. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Nitesh Jain, Sh. Atul Sharma and Sh. Abhinav Mukhi, Advocates. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASC with Sh. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC, Sh. Sahil Sood, Sh. Harshul Choudhary and Sh. Viprav Acharya, Advocates, for Respondent No.1. Sh. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Bina Gupta, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Rakhi Ray and Sh. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocates, for Respondent No.2. Sh. S.S. Haque, Sr. Assistant Director, Mrs. Deepmala Bagri, Assistant Director and Sh. Piyush Kumar, Assistant Director. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellant (hereafter Sunair) impugns a judgment and order of the learned single judge, dismissing its writ petition; ...
Tag this Judgment!National Highway Authority of India vs.m/s Bla Project Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 1/2019 Decided on:07. 01.2019 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar with Mr. Gaurav Mishra, Advs M/S BLA PROJECT PVT LTD versus Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.34/2019 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. O.M.P. (COMM) 1/2019 Prefatory Facts:2. This is a petition which seeks to challenge an award dated 31.08.2018.3. The respondent i.e. the original claimant, had lodged 13 claims while the petitioner i.e. the original respondent, had lodged 7 counter claims.4. Via the impugned award, the Arbitral Tribunal (in short A.T.) has awarded a total sum of Rs. 4,72,82,443/- along with interest at the rate of 10% per annum with effect from 01.09.2018. 4.1. Furthermore, the A.T. has also held that if the awarded amount is not paid as indicated in Annexure 1 appended to the award within the stipulated peri...
Tag this Judgment!Vivek Harivyasi vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order Reserved on:26. h December, 2018 Order Pronounced on:4th January, 2019 + W.P. (CRL) 3960/2018 VIVEK HARIVYASI ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibbal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. K.C. Mittal, Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Yaashna Thakran, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Mr. Kumar Manish, Ms. Jagriti, Ms. Ruchika Mittal and Mr. Yugansh Mittal, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Amit Mahajan, Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. CGSC, Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Tejaswita Sachdeva, Adv. for Mr. Anuraj Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Saud Ahmed, SFIO, Mr. Ajeet Srivastava, SFIO for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JYOTI SINGH, J.CRL.M.A. 50740/2018 (Exemption) Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P. (CRL) 3960/2018 & CRL.M.B. 50739/2018 1. By way of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the power o...
Tag this Judgment!