Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 68 of about 755 results (0.008 seconds)Saurabh Gupta vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3878/2017 & Crl.M.A. 15656/2017 SAURABH GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.L.Kohli & Mr. Varun Yadav, Advocates Versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.136/2017, under Sections 279/304-A IPC, registered at police station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi is sought by petitioners on the basis of statement made by respondents-complainants in proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Affidavits of respondents-complainants are also relied upon to seek quashing of FIR in question.2. Upon hearing and on perusal of charge-sheet of this case, statement made by complainant party and their affidavits, I find that the said statements were made by complainant party in proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the same cannot be the basis...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Khazani Devi Educational Society vs.central Board of Secondary Ed ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:8. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6123/2018 & CM APPL. 23758/2018 SMT. KHAZANI DEVI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ........ Petitioner Through Mr. J.P.Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Harsh K. Sharma, Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Ms. Mrigna Shekhar, Ms. Namisha Mehta and Mr. Akash Mishra, Advs. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Amit Bansal, Adv. with Ms. Seema Dolo, Adv. for CBSE Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Adv. with Mr. Rishesh Mani Tripathi, adv. for R-2/UOI Mr. Sumit Jidani, Adv. for R-3/Delhi Police % 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT The terminus a quo, of the present proceedings, may justifiably be said to be a complaint, launched by the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) with the Crime Branch, Delhi Police, on 27th March, 2018. The said complaint alleged that the CBSE had received a complaint, on 23rd March, 2018, from an unknown source, that th...
Tag this Judgment!Bhai Balbir Singh & Ors. Vs.bhai Upinder Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:8. 1.2019 EX.P. 92/2016 BHAI BALBIR SINGH & ORS. ..... Decree Holders Through: Mr. Adit S. Pujari with Ms. Kriti Awasthi and Ms. Surabhi Dhar, Advocates. BHAI UPINDER SINGH & ORS. versus ..... Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Abhijat with Mr. Sujoy, Judgment for Advocates Debtor-1. Mr. Jasmeet Singh with Mr. Srivats Kaushal, Advocates for JD-2A. Ms. Priyanka Sharma Goswami with Ms. Anusuya Sadhu Sinha and Ms. Amrita Sharma, Advocates Judgment Debtor-2B. Mr. Advocate for JD-2C. Mr. Gaurav Duggal with Mr. Mohit Seth, Advocates for JD- 3A, B & C. Ms. Malvika Trivedi, ASC with Mr. Pramod Sharma, Advocate for NDMC. Mahajan, Sanjeev for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) EX. APPL. No.4/2019 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. EX.P. 92/2016 Page 1 of 10 EX. APPL. (OS) No.46/2018 in EX.P. 92/2016 2. The substantive prayers made in the execution petition are as follows:-"(a) Direct the...
Tag this Judgment!Dharam Narayan Borana vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11765/2016 DHARAM NARAYAN BORANA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anju Gupta with Mr.Roshan Lal Goel, Advocates for UOI. Mr. R.L.Goyal, Advocate for CRPF. % ORDER0801.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is the second round of litigation involving the present... Petitioner. He came to the Court earlier with WP (C) 1477 of 2011 in circumstances which require to be noticed hereafter.2. On 5th March 2003, the... Petitioner was enrolled in the Central Reserved Police Force (CRPF) as Sub Inspector (SI). He remained with the 20th Battalion at Tripura from 15th June, 2004 up to 21st May 2006. On 1st June, 2006 he was posted to the Central Training Centre (CTC) IV, Gwalior and remained there till 13th October 2007. W.P.(C) 11765/2016 Page 1 of 8 3. On 14th October 2006 the... Petitioner was detailed for ...
Tag this Judgment!Aishani Chandna Mehra vs.rajesh Chandna & Ors
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h January, 2019. CS(OS) 235/2018 AISHANI CHANDNA MEHRA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Aman Nandrajog and Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, Advs. Versus RAJESH CHANDNA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Shikhil Suri, Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri and Ms. Vinishma Kant, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.12875/2018 (of the defendant no.1 u/O VII R-11 CPC) 1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit seeking partition of property No.296, Block No.D, Defence Colony, New Delhi - 110 024, monies and gold & jewellery of one Rita Chandna who is claimed to have died intestate at Delhi on 14th April, 2018, pleading that (i) the three defendants are the living son, daughter and husband of the said Rita Chandna; (ii) Rita Chandna, besides the living son and daughter impleaded as defendants herein, also had a son Rakesh Chandna who pre-deceased Rita Chandna; (iii) the plaintiff is the daughter of the said Rakesh Chandna and granddaughter of ...
Tag this Judgment!Sohan Pal vs.d.d.A.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h January, 2019 LPA12019 & CM. Nos. 3/2019, 4/2019 and 5/2019 SOHAN PAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advs. versus Through: Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. ..... Respondent D.D.A. AND + LPA22019 & CM. Nos. 26/2019, 27/2019 and 28/2019 BALJIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advs. versus D. D. A. (DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel ..... Respondent with Ms. Komal Sorout, Adv. AND + LPA32019 & CM. Nos. 29/2019, 30/2019 and 31/2019 MAHENDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advs. versus D. D. A. (DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel ..... Respondent AND + LPA42019 & CM. Nos. 32/2019, 33/2019 and 34/2019 with Ms. Komal Sorout, Adv. MADAN LAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra and LPA. No.1/2019 and connected matters Page 1 of ...
Tag this Judgment!Mani Farsaiya vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4184/2017 & Crl.M.A.16786/2017 MANI FARSAIYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Manan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kartik Gandotra, Mr. Uditi Bali, Mr. Mukul Aggarwal and Ms. Shivani Kant, Advocates Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with W/SI Prity Bala Mr.Anirudh K. Mudgal, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 11th July, 2017 dismisses petitioners revision petition without hearing petitioners counsel, as none had appeared on behalf of petitioner before the revisional court on the said date. While relying upon earlier order of 26th April, 2017, revisional court has dismissed petitioners revision petition on merits after going through the order impugned and material on record. CRL.M.C. 4184/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. Learned senior counsel for petitioner ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Micro Labs Limited vs.drugs Controller General of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & CM Nos. 40515-40516/2018 UNISON PHARAMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10128/2018 & CM Nos. 39519/2018 & 44752/2018 WITH ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10711/2018 & CM Nos. 41727-41728/2018 WITH M/S EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent WITH + W.P.(C) 10756/2018 & CM Nos. 41976-41977/2018 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 31 DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10935/2018 & CM Nos. 42603/2018 & 44753/2018 LUPIN LIMITED & ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10966/2018 & CM Nos. 42726-42727/2018 EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ..........
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Development Authority vs.m/s Sanyukt Nirmata & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :13. h September, 2018 Date of decision :8th January, 2019 O.M.P. 371/2007 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advocates. (M:9810029802) versus M/S SANYUKT NIRMATA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Ms. Nikita Salwan and Ms. Shreya Sharma, Advocates. (M:9811225368) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present Section 34 petition has been filed challenging the award dated 22nd November, 2004 passed by the Learned Sole Arbitrator.2. The Respondent/Contractor was awarded the work: C/O480Cat. II & III S.F.S. houses at Shalimar Bagh Block B Pocket W.SH: C/O208SFS houses. (Balance work). The estimated cost of the project was Rs.89,93,538/-. Tender was called for the said work and vide agreement dated 10th April, 1987, Sanyukt Nirmata - the contractor was awarded the works. The time allowed for completion was twelve months. T...
Tag this Judgment!k.r. Impex vs.punj Lloyd Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h January, 2019 K R IMPEX CS(COMM) 646/2016 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Medhanshu Tripathi & Mr. Harish Sharma, Advs. Versus PUNJ LLOYD LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Shadman Ali, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.2730/2018 (of the plaintiff under Order XI Rule 14 CPC) 1. The counsel for the plaintiff states that the defendant, along with its reply to the said application has produced some of the documents of which production was sought and the plaintiff for the time being is satisfied therewith and reserving its right to rely upon the documents so produced, for the time being does not press any further relief in this application.2. The application is disposed of. IA No.9035/2018 (of the defendant for condonation of 65 days delay in filing IA No.2730/2018) 3. With the disposal of IA No.2730/2018, this application has become infructuous and is disposed of. IA No.13553/2018 (of the plaintiff under...
Tag this Judgment!