Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 75 of about 755 results (0.010 seconds)Amit Kumar Jain vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Director, Gail (India) Ltd. And Ors. Vs.kali Ram
Court: Delhi
$~18 to 25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6546/2014 & CM APPL. 15611/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner RAI SINGH + Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6547/2014 & CM APPL. 15613/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner JITENDER KUMAR + Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6871/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus SHRI JAI BHAGWAN + W.P.(C) 6874/2014 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. DIRECTOR, GAIL (INDIA) LTD. AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6546/2014 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 KALI RAM + versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6876/2014 DIRECTOR, GAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioners versus Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. SHRI SRI RAM + W.P.(C) 68...
Tag this Judgment!Harsh Kumar Agarwal vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7489/2012 MAHENDER YADAV UOI & ANR versus + W.P.(C) 4951/2014 HARSH KUMAR AGARWAL UNION OF INDIA AND ORS versus Reserved on:04. 10.2018 Pronounced on:07. 01.2019 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 917/2018 CHAUDHARY KISHAN CHAND & SONS (HUF)........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus + CS(OS) 3518/2012, I.A. 3927/2013 & 15957/2013 RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST RAYMOND LTD & ANR versus ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendants Through:... Petitioner No.1 in person in W.P.(C) 516/2010 with Sh. Pranav Jain, Advocate, for... Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P.(C) 516/2010. Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. Rhea. G. Munjal, Ms. Bindita Chaturvedi and Sh. Dikshant Khanna, Advocates, for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4951/2014. Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj with Ms. Ananya Mukherjee, Advocates, for Respondent No.3, in W.P.(C) 516/2010.. Sh. Ankit Jain and Sh. Siddhnat Nath, Advocates, for New Delhi...
Tag this Judgment!Master Singham (Through Natural Guardian) vs.directorate of Education ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8791/2018 & CM APPLs. 52194-95/2018 MASTER SINGHAM (THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. with Mr. Mohit Mudgal and Ms.Akansha Sharma, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.S. Sudheer, Adv. with Mrs. A. Mathew and Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % 1. Master Singham is an 8-year old boy. He was granted admission, in the Sanskriti School (hereinafter referred to as the School) in 2013, under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category. Three years later, his admission was ignominiously cancelled, by the Directorate of Education (DoE), vide under Section 24(3) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the DSE Act) read with c...
Tag this Judgment!Nri Financial Services Ltd. & Ors. Vs.shri Mukesh Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h January, 2019 + O.M.P. 71/2006 NRI FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M. S. Akhtar, Advocates for... Petitioner No.3. (M:9711684779 & 9910770311) versus SHRI MUKESH KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Aman Mehta, Advocate. (M:9818023754) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) REVIEW PET. 2/2019 in O.M.P. 71/2006 1. The present review petition No.2/2019 has been filed seeking review of order dated 12th November, 2018 passed in O.A.141/2018.2. As recorded in the order dated 12th November, 2018, the O.A.141/2018 was preferred against the order dated 4th September, 2018 passed by the Joint Registrar dismissing the application of the... Petitioners seeking condonation of delay in disclosing the details of movable and immovable assets.3. The said O.A. was dismissed after a reasoned order passed on 12th November, 2...
Tag this Judgment!Sushmita vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Siddharth Rajkonwar vs.meesha Arora
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 07, 2019 + 1. CRL.M.C. 31/2019 & Crl.M.A. 115/2019 SIDDHARTH RAJKONWAR ........ Petitioner Through: In person with Advocate (appearance not given) Versus MEESHA ARORA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Nemo. ..... Respondent ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners complaint for defamation has been dismissed by the trial court while observing that though the complaint is true narration of facts, but it does not contain defamatory words. The Revisional Court has upheld trial courts order and dismissed petitioners complaint for defamation.2. The challenge to impugned order is on the ground that respondents complaint of 9th November, 2013 to police is defamatory. Attention of this Court is drawn to RTI reply (Annexure P-3) to point out that from respondents complaint, no cognizable offence is made out.3.... Petitioners counsel has drawn attention of this Court to paragraph No.54 of trial courts order to point out that trial c...
Tag this Judgment!Ms Varsha Dimri vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Shobha Aggarwal and Ors. Vs.uoi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 10.2018 Pronounced on:07. 01.2019 versus SHOBHA AGGARWAL & ORS. UOI & ANR. + W.P.(C) 516/2010 & CM APPL. 26668/2018 + W.P.(C) 7489/2012 + W.P.(C) 4951/2014 HARSH KUMAR AGARWAL UNION OF INDIA AND ORS MAHENDER YADAV UOI & ANR versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 917/2018 CHAUDHARY KISHAN CHAND & SONS (HUF)........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus + CS(OS) 3518/2012, I.A. 3927/2013 & 15957/2013 RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST RAYMOND LTD & ANR versus ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendants Through:... Petitioner No.1 in person in W.P.(C) 516/2010 with Sh. Pranav Jain, Advocate, for... Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P.(C) 516/2010. Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. Rhea. G. Munjal, Ms. Bindita Chaturvedi and Sh. Dikshant Khanna, Advocates, for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4951/2014. Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj with Ms. Ananya Mukh...
Tag this Judgment!Sony Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.additional Commissioner ...
Court: Delhi
$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:07. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 3174/2018, C.M. Appl. No.12596/2018 SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. + W.P.(C) 3175/2018, C.M. Appl. No.12598/2018 SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. ..... Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Nageshwar Rao, Mr. Sandeep S. Karnail, Mr. Parth, Advocates Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) It is stated that the petitioners counsel that the rejoinder was filed; apparently, the respondent has not received copy of the same. W.P.(C) No.3174 & 3175 of 2018 Page 1 of 5 Let the same be supplied. The petitioners grievance is with respect to the demand made by the Assessing O...
Tag this Judgment!