Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 73 of about 755 results (0.020 seconds)Partha Sarathi Saha vs.assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + WP (C) 8466/2017 and CM No.34859/2017 Judgment reserved on :22. 09.2017 Date of decision :07. 01.2019 PARTHA SARATHI SAHA (Proprietor of M/s Sri Krishna Automobiles) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abheek Saha, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER .... Respondent Through: Mr. Satpal Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J.JUDGMENT1 The petitioner Mr. Partha Sarathi Saha, proprietor of M/s Sri Krishna Automobiles vide the present petition seeks the setting aside of the order dated 09.05.2017 of the Ld. Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in ATA No.480 (2) 2013 vide which the appeal ATA No.480 (2) 2013 filed by the petitioner herein against the order dated 01.07.2013 passed by the APFC, SRO, Agartala in Order No.NE/AGT/ENF/8209/7a/2012/13/3698 in proceedings under Section 7A of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous WP (C) 8466/2017 Page 1 of 22 Provisions Act, 1952 ...
Tag this Judgment!Rocky Bhardwaj vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Gail (India) Ltd. Vs.ramphal
Court: Delhi
$~18 to 25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6546/2014 & CM APPL. 15611/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner RAI SINGH + Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6547/2014 & CM APPL. 15613/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner JITENDER KUMAR + Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6871/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus SHRI JAI BHAGWAN + W.P.(C) 6874/2014 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. DIRECTOR, GAIL (INDIA) LTD. AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6546/2014 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 KALI RAM + versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6876/2014 DIRECTOR, GAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioners versus Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. SHRI SRI RAM + W.P.(C) 68...
Tag this Judgment!Prachi vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Tushar Arora vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Sabreen Yusuf vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Mahender Yadav vs.uoi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7489/2012 MAHENDER YADAV UOI & ANR versus + W.P.(C) 4951/2014 HARSH KUMAR AGARWAL UNION OF INDIA AND ORS versus Reserved on:04. 10.2018 Pronounced on:07. 01.2019 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 917/2018 CHAUDHARY KISHAN CHAND & SONS (HUF)........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus + CS(OS) 3518/2012, I.A. 3927/2013 & 15957/2013 RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST RAYMOND LTD & ANR versus ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendants Through:... Petitioner No.1 in person in W.P.(C) 516/2010 with Sh. Pranav Jain, Advocate, for... Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P.(C) 516/2010. Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. Rhea. G. Munjal, Ms. Bindita Chaturvedi and Sh. Dikshant Khanna, Advocates, for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4951/2014. Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj with Ms. Ananya Mukherjee, Advocates, for Respondent No.3, in W.P.(C) 516/2010.. Sh. Ankit Jain and Sh. Siddhnat Nath, Advocates, for New Delhi...
Tag this Judgment!Sandeep Singh Chandok vs.nancy
Court: Delhi
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:07. 01.2019 Cont. Cas. (C) No.414/2015 SANDEEP SINGH CHANDOK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Upadhyay, Advocate with petitioner in person. NANCY Versus ....Respondent Through: Ms. Ekta, Mr. Manish Kumar & Mr.Aman Gupta, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Cont. Cas. (C) No.414/2015 & C.M. No.32483/2018 (restoration) 1. This contempt petition was disposed of by this court on 19.07.2018 with the following order :-"Ms. Ekta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that the respondent undertakes to withdraw the cases filed by her against the petitioner and his family members, which are pending adjudication in Rohini Courts and further undertakes that the respondent will co-operate in the quashing of the subject FIR in the Crl. M.C., which is pending adjudication before this Court on the next dates of hearing i.e. 05.09.2018 and 10.09.2018, respectively. Cont....
Tag this Judgment!Akansha Pandey vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjeev Jain & Anr. Vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 07, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 1/2019 SANJEEV JAIN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vijay Dutt & Mr. Surya Prakash Rana, Advocates Versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Jai Bhagwan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 20/2019 Delay of 76 days in re-filing the petition is condoned for the reasons stated in the application. Application is disposed of. Crl.M.A. 19/2019 There is delay of 11 days in filing the accompanying petition. Upon hearing, I find that sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay occasioned. The application is allowed and delay is condoned. The application is disposed of. Crl.M.A. 18/2019 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.Rev.P.18/2019 Page 1 of 2 CRL.REV.P. 1/2019 1. In this petition, the challenge is to the concurrent findings of the courts below regarding conviction and ...
Tag this Judgment!