Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms Bharti vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Himani vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Rashid Sheikh vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 07, 2019 CRL.A. 254/2018 RASHID SHEIKH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Singh Rathore, Advocate Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Karamvir, P.S. Narela CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned judgment of 6th December, 2017 holds appellant guilty of offences under Sections 392/506(II) IPC and vide impugned order of 13th December, 2017, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of 3,000/- for the offence under Section 392 IPC and for the offence under Section 506(II) IPC, appellant has been sentenced rigorous imprisonment for two years. Both the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.2. Upon hearing and on perusal of the evidence on record, I find that conviction of the appellant for the offences in question is borne out from the evidence on record. However, ...
Harshit Bansal vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Pramod Kumar Kaushik vs.uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
$~15 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10139/2009 PARMOD KUMAR KAUSHIK & ORS ........ Petitioners UOI & ORS + Through: Mr. H. S. Dahiya, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Advocate. And W.P.(C) 1415/2012 PRAMOD KUMAR KAUSHIK UOI AND ORS Through: None. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER0701.2019 SANJEEV NARULA, J: CM No.3069/2012 in W.P.(C) 1415/2012 1. By this application, the... Petitioners are seeking interim orders for further promotion of Respondent No.4 to the post of Assistant Commandants (Accounts Officer). In a similar application being CM No.855/2009 in W.P.(C) 10139/2009 & W.P.(C) 1415/2012 Page 1 of 16 WP(C) No.10139/2009, the... Petitioner had sought stay of the operation of seniority list dated 14th October, 2008. While disposing of the said application...
Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust vs.raymond Ltd. And Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7489/2012 MAHENDER YADAV UOI & ANR versus + W.P.(C) 4951/2014 HARSH KUMAR AGARWAL UNION OF INDIA AND ORS versus Reserved on:04. 10.2018 Pronounced on:07. 01.2019 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 917/2018 CHAUDHARY KISHAN CHAND & SONS (HUF)........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus + CS(OS) 3518/2012, I.A. 3927/2013 & 15957/2013 RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST RAYMOND LTD & ANR versus ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendants Through:... Petitioner No.1 in person in W.P.(C) 516/2010 with Sh. Pranav Jain, Advocate, for... Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P.(C) 516/2010. Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. Rhea. G. Munjal, Ms. Bindita Chaturvedi and Sh. Dikshant Khanna, Advocates, for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4951/2014. Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj with Ms. Ananya Mukherjee, Advocates, for Respondent No.3, in W.P.(C) 516/2010.. Sh. Ankit Jain and Sh. Siddhnat Nath, Advocates, for New Delhi...
Patel- Gammon Joint Venture vs.satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:7. 1.2019 + ARB.P. 717/2018 PATEL- GAMMON JOINT VENTURE ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shankh Sengupta and Mr.Mohit Rohtagi, Advs. versus SATLUJ JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Krishan Kumar Upadhyay, Adv for R-1. Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Harish Ahuja, Adv for R-2/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1 Notice in this petition was issued as far as back on 25.09.2018. On that date, respondent No.2/UOI was represented by Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC. Pertinently, on 25.09.2018, no objection with regard to the jurisdiction of this Court was taken. Thereafter, the matter was listed before the Court on 18.12.2018. On that date as well, both respondent No.1 as also respondent No.2/UOI were represented. On this date, counsel for respondent No.1 sought and was granted two weeks to file a reply. 1.1 To be noted, respondent No.2/UOI had not filed its reply even till...
Rohtash Tomar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 07, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2/2019 ROHTASH TOMAR ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Mr. Jaideep Malik, Advocate Versus Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Prem Yadav ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 11/2019 (u/S482Cr.P.C.) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 10/2019 & Crl.M.A. 10/2019 (for stay) Quashing of FIR No.673/2015, under Sections 186/353/2IPC, registered at police station Nangloi, Delhi is sought on the ground that without sanction under Section 195 Cr.P.C, charge under Section 224 of IPC cannot be framed. To submit so, reliance is placed upon decisions of Coordinate Bench of this Court in Gurinder Singh Vs. State of Delhi 1996 LawSuit (Del) 463 and Sushil Sharma & Anr. Vs. State & Anr. 2015 SCC OnLine Del 7655. Upon hearing and on perusal of charge and decisions cited, I find that the allegation against petitioner f...
Sunil Alagh vs.shivraj Puri & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h January, 2019 SUNIL ALAGH CS(OS) 600/2016 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Esha Dutta, Mr. Sahil Garg and Mr. Devang Kumar, Advs. SHIVRAJ PURI & ANR Versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Prabhav Ralli, Adv. for D-2 with D-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This suit for recovery of money is ripe for framing of issues.2. The counsel for the plaintiff states that the written statement of the defendants does not raise any material proposition of fact or law on which an issue arises and the suit is entitled to be decreed forthwith.3. The counsel for the plaintiff and the counsel for the defendant No.2 Raghuraj Puri have been heard and the files perused.4. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.2,39,50,000/-, pleading (i) that the plaintiff based at Mumbai is the sole proprietor of M/s SKA Advisors; (ii) that the plaintiff and the defendant No.2 Raghuraj Puri have been...
Gail (India) Ltd. & Ors vs.shri Jai Bhagwan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2019
$~18 to 25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6546/2014 & CM APPL. 15611/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner RAI SINGH + Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6547/2014 & CM APPL. 15613/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner JITENDER KUMAR + Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6871/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus SHRI JAI BHAGWAN + W.P.(C) 6874/2014 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. DIRECTOR, GAIL (INDIA) LTD. AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6546/2014 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 KALI RAM + versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6876/2014 DIRECTOR, GAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioners versus Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. SHRI SRI RAM + W.P.(C) 68...
- ‹ Prev
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- Next ›
- Last »