Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rameshwar vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~3 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 317/2018 Decided on :02. d August, 2018 RAMESHWAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. D.K. Devesh and Mr. Hitesh Vats, Advocates versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP Mr. Rakesh Malviya, Mr. Karanveer Chaudhary and Mr. Prashant Shivrajan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) Allegations have been made against the petitioner in the First Information Report (FIR) no.13/2018 of police station Fateh Pur Beri involving offences punishable under Sections 447, 511, 379, 392, 451, 506, 34 IPC. Apprehending arrest, he has approached this court seeking anticipatory bail by the petition at hand.2. The FIR was registered on 14.01.2018 on the basis of statement of Jai Prakash describing himself as caretaker of M/s. K.W. Traders. He would allege that at about 1.00 p.m. when he was present on the plot of land belonging to the company at C-2...
Sanjeev Bhasin vs.preeti Arya
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SANJEEV BHASIN PREETI ARYA RFA No.607/2018 1st August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Krishna Dev Pandey, Advocate. versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No30349/2018 (for condonation of delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 59 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.607/2018 and C.M. No.30348/2018(stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 9.1.2018 by which Page 1 of 7 trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff and has awarded to the respondent/plaintiff a money decree for a sum of Rs.7.25 lacs alongwith interest @ 9% per annum.3. At the outset, it is to be noted that the impugned judgment and decree is an exparte ...
Narender Sayal & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3831/2018 NARENDER SAYAL & ORS STATE & ORS versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: Ms. Nimmi Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Bijender Singh, P.S. Madhu Vihar Ms. Manju Dutt, Adv. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 3831/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.449 of 2016 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC at Police Station Madhu Vihar, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.2 is the father-in-law and petitioner No.3 is the mother-in-law of the CRL.M.C. 3831/2018 Page 1 of 3 respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.4 is the sister-in-law of the respondent No.2.3. The respondent No.2 is p...
The Orental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.hitesh Sadh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 01, 2018 + MAC.APP. 256/2013 + MAC.APP. 257/2013 1. THE ORENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. JPN Shahi, Advocate versus HITESH SADH & ORS. NIDHI SADH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for respondents-Claimants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The above-captioned two appeals arise out of common impugned Award of 12th December, 2012 vide which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-02, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) grants compensation of `6,15,000/- to Injured-Hitesh Sadh and `2,74,000/- to Injured-Nidhi Sadh, who were grievously injured in a vehicular accident which took place on 17th June, 2006. The Tribunal holds that appellant is the Insurer of offending vehicle in question and even though the driving licence of driver of insured vehicle was found to be fake, it chooses not to exonerate appellant- Insurer w...
State vs.harbhajan Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 35/2003 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. STATE HARBHAJAN SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR Through: None. versus % JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT0108.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal has been preferred by the State against the judgment dated 19th February 2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in SC No.82/1996 arising out of FIR No.313/1996 registered at PS Sultanpuri whereby the four co-accused were acquitted of the offence under Section 3IPC. A-3 and A-4 had been impleaded as Respondent Nos.3 and 4 in the present appeal. However, the Court has been informed that they have since expired and thus, the present appeal concerns only the acquittals of Harbhajan Singh (A-1) and Gurbachan Singh (A-2), father and son respectively.2. The charge against the four co-accused persons was that they, in furtherance of their common intention, committed the murder of Gurp...
Jagran Prakashan Ltd. Vs.sh. Ram Jeevan Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~13 * + W.P.(C) 1425/2018 & CM No.5881/2018 JAGRAN PRAKASHAN LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Birendra Mishra & Ms.Poonam, Proxy Counsel versus SH. RAM JEEVAN GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Akhil Sharma & Ms.Isha Aggarwal, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER0108.2018 The petitioner, Jagran Prakashan Limited has invoked the writ % 1. jurisdiction of this Court seeking quashing of the order dated 24th November, 2017, passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner under the Working Journalists & Other Newspaper Employees (Condition of Service and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1955 [in short Working Journalists Act]. and consequent Recovery Certificate issued on 30th November, 2017, whereby recovery of `14,06,656/- has been ordered by the said Authority.2. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order impugned herein inter alia on the ground that in view of the decision of this Court in The Associated Press through its Gener...
Dr. Atul Kumar Sodani vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:1. t August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4414/2016 and CM No.18474/2016 DR. ATUL KUMAR SODANI Through: versus ........ Petitioner... Petitioner in person UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % (JUDGMENT) C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The petitioner, who claims to be a freelance journalist and an RTI and social activist, has, by means of this writ petition, expressed his discomfiture at appointments having been effected against posts, in the Press Information Bureau (hereinafter referred to as PIB), which stand abolished by operation of law, and at public monies having been defrayed towards disbursement of pay and allowances to such appointees.2. The petitioner contends that, by virtue of the fact that they had remained unfilled for more than a year, and had not been created/revived afresh with the approva...
Veecon Impex India & Ors. Vs.national Agricultural Cooperative Marketi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:01. t August, 2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 220/2016 VEECON IMPEX INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Arun Malik, Ms.Shruti Sharma & Ms.Ruchina Singh, Advs. versus NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Aaditya Vijaykumar & Ms.Liza M. Baruah, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Award dated 22.05.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator directing as under:-"FINDINGS: I. It is held that the claimant is entitled to claim interest on the outstanding amounts for all the three stages namely pre- reference period, pendent lite period and post-award period (para 7.2). II. Service Charges in terms of the MoU (Para 7.3). III. It is held that the claimant is entitled to charge compound ...
Rajeev Gulati vs.state ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01.08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3807/2018 RAJEEV GULATI ........ Petitioner versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : For the Respondent(s): Ms.Parul Yudha and Mr.Nand Lal Yudha, Advs Mr. Kamal Kr.Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Dev Kumar, P.S.Mayapuri. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM Appl.29006/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3807/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.456/2015 under Sections 354D/506/509 of the IPC at Police Station Mayapuri.2. The petitioner was the husband of the complainant. The allegation is that the petitioner entered into the office of the complainant and misbehaved with her.3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes. The FIR emanates out of matrimonial di...
Bharat Gupta vs.lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~34 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:1. t August, 2018 * % + W.P.(C) 10773/2015 BHARAT GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Bina Madhavan and Ms. Swati Bhardwaj, Advocates versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL306952018(waiver of cost) 1. By the present application, counsel for the LAC seeks waiver of cost of Rs.3,500/- and Rs. 2,500/- which were imposed by this Court by the orders dated 20.03.2018 and 16.05.2018 respectively. Cost of Rs.3,500/- imposed has been paid. For the reasons stated in the application, the additional cost of Rs.2,500/- imposed by the order dated 16.05.2018 is waived.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10773/2015 Page 1 of 4 W.P.(C) 10773/2015 3. This is a petition under Article 22...