Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Parveen Kumar vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~65 & 70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3825/2018 Judgment delivered on:01. 08.2018 versus PARVEEN KUMAR & ANR STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + CRL.M.C. 3828/2018 PARVEEN KUMAR THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Arun Sheoran and Mr. Anil Tomar, Advs. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ashwani, PS Jyoti Nagar (Crl. M.C.3825/2018) Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ashwani, PS Jyoti Nagar (Crl. M.C.3828/2018) Mr. Sushil Kumar, Adv. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0108.2018 CRL.M.C. 3825/2018 & 3828/2018 Page 1 of 3 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 29058/2018 (Exemption) in Crl. M.C.3828/2018 & Crl. M.A. 29050/2018 (Exemption) in Crl. M.C.3825/2018) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3825/2018 & CRL.M.C. 3828/2018 1. T...
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.kamlesh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 01, 2018 + MAC.APP. 904/2015 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus VEENA & ORS. Through: Mr. S.N.Prashar, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 906/2015 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N.Prashar, Advocate NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus KAMLESH & ORS. + MAC.APP. 913/2015 Versus JITENDER TANWAR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun K.Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MAC.APP. 904/2015 MAC.APP. 913/2015 MAC.APP. 906/2015 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Page 1 of 9 1. Impugned Award of 9th September, 2015 rendered by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) grants compensation to respondent-Claimants, on account of death of a vegetable seller- Varun s/o Lala Ram, aged 22 years; Shop keeper- Ajay s/...
M/S Paisalo Digital Ltd vs.m/s Jay Polychem (India) Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 164/2018 Date of decision:1. t August, 2018 M/S PAISALO DIGITAL LTD .... Appellant Through Mr. P. Nagesh, Advocate. Versus M/S JAY POLYCHEM (INDIA) LTD & ORS ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) M/s. Paisalo Digital Ltd., formerly known as S.E. Investments Ltd., has filed the present intra-Court appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A & C Act, for short) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015.2. Impugned order dated 7th May, 2018 dismisses the objections filed by appellant under Section 34 of the A & C Act, challenging the award dated 31st July, 2015 passed by the sole Arbitrator Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha, former Judge of the Supreme Court of India.3. Appellant a non-banking financial company engaged in the business of l...
Satyaveer @ Sagar & Ors. Vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi ) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2683/2018 Judgment delivered on:01. 08.2018 SATYAVEER @ SAGAR & ORS THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: Ms. Archana, Adv. along with petitioners For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with SI Kuldeep Bhat Mr. Imran Ali, Adv. for complainant JUDGMENT0108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.9554/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2683/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.998 of 2015 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC, Police Station Ghazipur, New Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord. CRL.M.C. 2683/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. It is prayed that exemption be granted to petitioner No.2, father of petitioner No.1 on the ground that he is aged about 67 y...
Gulfam & Anr. Vs.the State of Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h July, 2018 Decided on:01. t August, 2018 CRL.A. 1166/2017 GULFAM AND ANR Represented by: Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, ..... Appellants versus Advocate. THE STATE OF GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kr. Garg, APP for the State with SI Mukesh Yadav, PS Jagat Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, Gulfam and Mustar Jahan challenge the impugned judgment dated 11th October, 2017 convicting them for the offences punishable under Sections 448/304-II/34 IPC in FIR No.222/2012 registered at PS Jagat Puri and the order on sentence dated 30th October, 2017 directing them to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of 5000/-; in default thereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part-II/34 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months for the offence punishable under ...
Mcd vs.m/s Sharma & Associates & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MCD Date of Decision:1. t August, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 485/2016 Through: None. ........ Petitioner versus M/S SHARMA & ASSOCIATES & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Mishra and Mr. G.K. Pandey, Advocates. (M-9811235958) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. In this petition, there has been no appearance for MCD since 23rd March, 2015. Brief background of the case is that the... Petitioner, had invited a tender for civil works and the Respondent herein was the successful bidder. The bid was accepted by the... Petitioner @77.95% above the tender amount of Rs.13,98,525/- and the work was to begin on 7th October, 1993. The time for completion was 12 months. Due to various lapses, the completion of the work got delayed but was finally completed on 30th April, 1998. The final bill of the Respondent was approved by the... Petitioner on 30th June, 1998, however, payment was only made on 31st March, 2000 after hold...
Iffco Tokio General Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.munna @ Daud & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August 01, 2018 + MAC. APP. 240/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhiushek Kumar Gola, Advocate Versus + MAC. APP. 262/2013 MUNNA @ DAUD & ORS. Through: Nemo. .....Respondents 1. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhiushek Kumar Gola, Advocate Versus AZAD KHAN & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Nemo. JUDGMENT (ORAL) .....Respondents In a vehicular accident, which took place on 23rd March, 2010, Munna @ Daud, s/o Ramajan Ali and Azad Khan s/o Munshi Khan, were grievously injured and they had sought compensation on account of injuries suffered by them. Vide separate Awards of even date i.e. of 2nd January, 2013, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred MAC.APP. 240/2013 MAC.APP. 262/2013 Page 1 of 3 to as the Tribunal), granted compensation of `5,85,200/- with interest @7.5% to injured Munna @ Daud and compensation of `1,26,031/...
Hdfc Bank Ltd vs.indus Poyfilms Specialists Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3499/2018 HDFC BANK LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Kunal Tandon, Mr Chetan Roy, Ms Niti Jain, Advocates. versus INDUS POYFILMS SPECIALISTS PVT LTD & ORS Through: Ms Ripu Adlakha, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0108.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 05.03.2018 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the CMM (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CC No.514112/2016 captioned HDFC Bank Ltd. v. M/s Indus Polyfilms Specialists Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. The petitioner claims to be a secured creditor of the respondents and had filed an application under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereafter the SARFAESI Act) before the learned CMM (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi for taking possession of the ground floor W.P.(C) 3499/2018 Page 1...
Reliance Commercial Finace Ltd vs.sameer Seth and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~50 to 52 * % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:1. t August, 2018 EFA(OS) 12/2018 & CM Nos. 27991-992/2018 RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINACE LTD Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus SAMEER SETH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr.Manav Gupta, and Ms.Esha Dutta, Mr.Salil Garg Advocates for respondents. EFA(OS) 13/2018 & CM Nos. 27993-994/2018 RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINACE LTD Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus SAMEER SETH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr.Manav Gupta, and Ms.Esha Dutta, Mr.Salil Garg Advocates for respondents. EFA(OS) 14/2018 & CM Nos.29155-29156/2018 RELIANCE COMMERCICAL FINANCE LTD Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus SAMEER SETH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr.Manav Gupta, and Ms.Esha Dutta, Mr.Salil Garg Advocates for respondents. EFA (OS) 12/2018, 13/2018 & 14/2018, Page 1 of 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE...
Jagran Prakashan Ltd. Vs.abhishek Rawat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~10 * + W.P.(C) 990/2018 with CM Nos.4168/2018 & 4170/2018 JAGRAN PRAKASHAN LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Birendra Mishra & Ms.Poonam, Proxy Counsel versus ABHISHEK RAWAT ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER0108.2018 The petitioner, Jagran Prakashan Limited has invoked the writ % 1. jurisdiction of this Court seeking quashing of the order dated 24th November, 2017, passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner under the Working Journalists & Other Newspaper Employees (Condition of Service and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1955 [in short Working Journalists Act]. and consequent Recovery Certificate issued on 30th November, 2017, whereby recovery of `09,45,026/- has been ordered by the said Authority.2. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order impugned herein inter alia on the ground that in view of the decision of this Court in The Associated Press through its General Manag...
- ‹ Prev
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 94
- 95
- Next ›
- Last »