Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Priyanka Verma vs.kunal Verma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
$~52 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:6. h August, 2018 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 182/2018 & C.M.30797/2018 PRIYANKA VERMA KUNAL VERMA Through: Mr.Vivek Singh, Advocate versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Mr.V.K.Gupta, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sakal Bhushan and Mr.Vipul Agrawal, Advts. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Although process fee has been returned with objection, Mr.V.K.Gupta, learned Senior Counsel, on instructions, has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent on an advance copy having been served and submits that the appeal is not maintainable.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 04.07.2018 and 09.07.2018 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Saket, New Delhi. We may note that this matter was listed on 03.08.2018 when we had passed the following order: MAT.APP.(F.C.) 182/2018 & CM No.30797/2018 (stay) Challenge in this appeal is to the orders dated 04.07...
Surinder Bhatiani vs.som Nath (Deceased) Thr Lrs & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
$~137. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA2812017 & C.M. No.44659/2017 (for stay). SURINDER BHATIANI Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Adv. ..... Appellant versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Chanchal Sharma, Adv. for R-3. SOM NATH (DECEASED) THR LRS & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER0608.2018 This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil 1. Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order [dated 28th July, 2017 in RCA No.1/16 of the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge (South-West), Dwarka Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal of appeal preferred by the appellant against the order [dated 26th April, 2012 in M-1of the Court of Civil Judge-01 (North), Delhi]. of dismissal of an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC filed by the appellant/plaintiff for setting aside the ex parte order dated 31st August, 2000 and the ex parte decree dated 4th November, 2003.2. Though I was curious about the ex parte decree against a plaintiff, but a reading of th...
Shafiq Ahmed vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
#54 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8125/2018 SHAFIQ AHMED ........ Petitioner versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr. Amit Kumar Verma, Advocates : Mr. G.D. Mishra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"In the facts and circumstances of the present case this Honble Court may pleased to: W.P.(C) 8125/2018 Page 1 of 3 a) Pass a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order(s)/direction(s) against the respondent, thereby directing or ordering the respondent to allow a period of 15 days to the petitioner to remove his machines, raw/furnished material out of the premises so sealed by the respondent i.e. premises bearing H.No.3, Gali No.2, Khasra No.5/7/2, Kamal Vihar, Kara...
Mohd. Ibrahim vs. Naresh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MOHD. IBRAHIM NARESH KUMAR RFA No.626/2018 6th August, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. Azizul Hasan, Advocate. Through: versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.31207/2018(for condonation of delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of two days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.626/2018 and C.M. No.31206/2018(stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 19.3.2018 by which trial court has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the RFA No.626/2018 Page 1 of 8 appellant/defendant and has decreed the suit filed under Order XXXVII CPC by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of a sum of Rs.5 lacs. The subject suit was filed for recovery of a loan amo...
Rakesh Kumar vs.lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
$~28 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:6. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8080/2015 RAKESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Adv versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Dhanesh Relan and Ms. Akshita Manocha, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. The petitioner seeks quashing of notification No.10(29)/96/L&B/LA11394dated 27.10.1999 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The subject matter of this writ petition is land comprised in Khasra No.(10 Biswas) and Khasra No.(11 Biswas), total land measuring 1055 Sq. yards situated at Village Prehaldpur Bangar, W.P. (C) No.8080/2015 Page 1 of 6 Delhi 110042...
Union of India vs.manjit Singh Bali
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:06. 08.2018 + W.P.(C) 6341/2015 and CM Nos. 11546/2015 & 35797/2016 UNION OF INDIA versus MANJIT SINGH BALI AND ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 1803/2018 and CM No.7410/2018 UNION OF INDIA versus MANJIT SINGH BALI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr R.V. Sinha and Mr A.S. Singh. Mr Ankur Chawla, Ms Kalyani Lal and Mr Sangram Hooda. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner (UOI) has filed the present petitions under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the orders dated 20.01.2015 (impugned in W.P(C) 6341/2015) and 30.06.2017 (impugned in W.P.(C) 1803/2018) passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter W.P.(C) 6341/2015 & W.P.(C) 1803/2018 Page 1 of 21 CIC) allowing the second appeals preferred by the respondent under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information ...
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs.randhir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO3212018 Judgment reserved on :31. t July, 2018 Date of decision:6. h August, 2018 M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED ..... Appellant. Through: Mr. Puneet Bhalla, Advocate Versus RANDHIR SINGH Through: .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant assails the impugned order dated 30.5.2018 of the learned Trial Court in CS No.18whereby on a suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery along with an application Under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for appointment of a receiver to take over the possession of the vehicle, i.e., car make Duster Diesel 110 PS/RXL bearing registration No.UP16AS3244 the learned Trial Court directed the issuance of the summons for settlement of issues along with the notice of the said application to the defendant returnable for 9.10.2018.2. The prayer made by the appellant herein as plaintiff to the said suit seeking appointment of an ...
Shubhra Verma Bhatnagar vs.dr Jayshree Mehta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
#46 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 08.2018 CONT.CAS(C) 583/2018 SHUBHRA VERMA BHATNAGAR ........ Petitioner versus DR JAYSHREE MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh and Mr. Abhimanyu Shrestha, Advocates : Mr. T. Singhdev and Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocates with Ms. Parul Goel, Deputy Secretary CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) CM APPL.31290/2018 & CM APPL.31291/2018 (Exemption) Exemptions granted subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of accordingly. CONT.CAS(C) 583/2018 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 prays as follows:-"CONT.CAS.(C) 583/2018 Page 1 of 4 against the contempt It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Honble Commission may be pleased to: a) Initiate alleged contemnor for intent...
Aas Mohmmad vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
#62 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8148/2018 AAS MOHMMAD ........ Petitioner versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr. Amit Kumar Verma, Advocates : Mr. G.D. Mishra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"In the facts and circumstances of the present case this Honble Court may pleased to: W.P.(C) 8148/2018 Page 1 of 3 a) Pass a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order(s)/direction(s) against the respondent, thereby directing or ordering the respondent to allow a period of 15 days to the petitioner to remove his machines, raw/furnished material out of the premises so sealed by the respondent i.e. premises bearing No.B-47, F/F, Plot No.14, Gali No.12, Rajeev Nagar, Ma...
Lalit Narayan vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
$~75 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:6. h August, 2018 LPA4292018 LALIT NARAYAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr Nikhil Bhardwaj, Adv versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Bhagvan Swaroop Shukla, CGSC with Mr Kamaldeep, Adv for R-1&2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM Nos. 31340-41/2018 (exemptions) Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. LPA4292018 and CM No.31339/2018 (stay) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 03.08.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge wherein the application filed by the appellant along with the writ petition for interim relief has remained undecided. Counsel for the appellant submits that reading of the order dated 03.08.2018 would show that neither the application has been heard nor the prayer rejected. He LPA4292018 Page 1 of 6 submits that the effect of this order would be that the w...