Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Louis Vuitton Malletier vs.mr. Omi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CCP(O) 10/2018 IN CS(COMM) 291/2018 ........ Petitioner LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER Through Mr. Pravin Anand with versus Mr. Dhruv Anand, Ms. Udita Patro and Mr. Shamim Nooreyezdan, Advocates MR. OMI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Nitin Mehta, Advocate Reserved On :12. h July, 2018 Date of Decision:07. h August, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J FACTUAL BACKGROUND LEADING TO FILING OF CONTEMPT PETITION AND DISPOSAL OF THE SUIT1 The present suit had been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, dilution and tarnishment, damages, delivery up etc. by the petitioner/plaintiff Louis Vuitton, which is a highly reputed company.2. The suit was filed against the respondents/defendants for the sale of counterfeit products bearing the petitioners/plaintiffs registered trade mark and logo on 29th August, 2013.3. An ex-parte ad interim injunction was passed in favou...
Manish Singhal vs.lt. Governor, Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~35 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:7. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10974/2015 MANISH SINGHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Akhil Sachar and Ms Sunanda Tulsyan, Advs. versus LT. GOVERNOR, NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Dhanesh Relan and Ms. Komal Sorout, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of notification No.10(29)/96/L&B/LA11394dated 27.10.1999 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The subject matter of this writ petition is land comprised in Khasra No.44//19 min (0-18) and 44/2min (0-06), admeasuring 1 bigha and 4 biswas situated in the revenue estate of village Prehladpur Banger, Delhi-110042.2. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition...
Viresh Mohan vs.state (Nct) of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 08.2018 CRL.REV.P. 327/2017 VIRESH MOHAN versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Abhishek Vikram, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for State with ASI Narender Kumar, PS Bawana. Mr. Sahil Malik with Mr. Vishal Bhardwaj and Mr. Vikas Dabas, Advocates for R-2 to 8 & 10 Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya with Mr. Raj Karan Sharma, Mr. Aditya Yadav and Mr. Priyanshu Malik, Advocates for R-9. JUDGMENT0708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 06.08.2013 limited to the extent that the said order discharges respondent No.10 Dharmender, son of CRL.REV.P. 327/2017 Page 1 of 5 Ram Singh. The Trial Court has held that prima facie no charge is made out against respondent No.10 Dharmender.2. The contention of the learned counsel for the pe...
Pooja vs.government of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~66 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 8264/2018 and CM No.31658/2018 (stay) Date of Judgment:7. h August, 2018 POOJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sunil K. Goel, Adv versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain, SC with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Adv for LAC Mr Sanjay Singh, Adv for DDA Mr Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr Sanjay Pall, Adv for R-3&5 Mr Sunder Khatri, Adv for NDMC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL)... Petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to the land of the petitioner comprising of 9 bigha 2 biswas in khasra No.14 situated in the revenue estate of Village Malcha known as Nathu ki Bagichi/garden, Panchquian Road, New Delhi are deemed to have lapsed as neither physical possession has been taken over nor compensation has been tendered. WP(C) 8264/2018 Page 1 of 4 2. Counsel for the respondents who enters appearance on an ad...
Arjun Aggarwal vs.vijay & Ors (The New India Assurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 07, 2018 + MAC.APP. 219/2016 & CMs 8544/16, 173+ MAC.APP. 220/2016 & CMs 8547/16, 17403-04/16, 137+ MAC.APP. 221/2016 & CMs 8550/16, 17406-07/16, 137THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates versus KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ORS KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ORS ARJUN AGGARWAL & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Yogesh Narula, Advocates for respondents-Claimants + MAC.APP. 252/2016 + MAC.APP. 253/2016 + MAC.APP. 254/2016 ARJUN AGGARWAL KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ANR. KAMLESH AGGARWAL ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Yogesh Narula, Advocates versus VIJAY & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates for Insurer .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MAC.APP.220/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned six appeals arise out of one vehicular ...
East Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs.karan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~20. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8223/2018 EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, Advocate. versus KARAN SINGH Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER0708.2018 CM APPL. 31497/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 8223/2018 and CM APPL. 31496/2018 (stay) 1. The petitioners/EDMC have challenged an order dated 17.7.2017, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi, partly allowing O.A. No.2196/2011 filed by the respondent, who had retired from the services in the MCD, on the post of Principal/Head Master on 31.12.2008 and directing the petitioners/EDMC to grant him interest on the delayed payment of all the retirement benefits including the gratuity, leave encashment, commutation, GPF etc., at the prevailing GPF rates and bank interest, i.e., @ 8% p.a. for the delayed payment. W.P.(C) 8...
Raj Kumar vs. The Commission (Housingh Lig), Dda and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
#60 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:07. 08.2018 ....... Petitioner W.P.(C) 8260/2018 RAJ KUMAR versus THE COMMISSION (HOUSINGH LIG), DDA AND ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Ankan Suri, Advocate For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) C.M. No.31649/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C)No.8260/2018 Page1of5 W.P.(C) 8260/2018 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, prays as follows: b) direct the respondents to cancel/withdraw the cancellation letter dated 20.02.2004 and refund letter dated 11.03.2004 whereby the respondents had cancelled the allotment in favour of the appellants. c) direct the respondents to issue a fresh demand- cum-allotment letter to the appellant for a flat in the sa...
The State Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.khursheed
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:11. 07.2018 Judgment delivered on:07. 08.2018 CRL.A. 510/2018 THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP with Insp. Ajay Kumar, ASI Tuli Ram, PS Badarpur versus KHURSHEED ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Mallika Parmar, Advocate DHCLSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The State has preferred the present appeal upon grant of leave to assail the judgment dated 24.11.2016 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, South East District, New Delhi in Case No.1808/ 16, Sessions Case No.209/ 13, arising out of FIR No.369/ 2013 registered at Police Station- Badarpur under Sections 376 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. CRL.A. 510/2018 Page 1 of 59 2. By the impugned judgment, the Trial Court has acquitted the Respondent/ Accused- Khursheed, inter alia, on the premise that the testimony of t...
Puneet Goel & Ors vs.state of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3964/2018 PUNEET GOEL & ORS versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Rajeev Garg, Advocate. Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. Mr. Rohit Goel, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. ASI Radhey Shyam, PS Jafrabad. JUDGMENT0708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29472/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3964/2018 The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.713/2015 under 1. CRL.M.C. 3964/2018 Page 1 of 3 Sections 406/498A/34 IPC, Police Station Jafrabad.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.4 is the sister-in-law of t...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.arjun Aggarwal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 07, 2018 + MAC.APP. 219/2016 & CMs 8544/16, 173+ MAC.APP. 220/2016 & CMs 8547/16, 17403-04/16, 137+ MAC.APP. 221/2016 & CMs 8550/16, 17406-07/16, 137THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates versus KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ORS KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ORS ARJUN AGGARWAL & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Yogesh Narula, Advocates for respondents-Claimants + MAC.APP. 252/2016 + MAC.APP. 253/2016 + MAC.APP. 254/2016 ARJUN AGGARWAL KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ANR. KAMLESH AGGARWAL ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Yogesh Narula, Advocates versus VIJAY & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates for Insurer .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MAC.APP.220/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned six appeals arise out of one vehicular ...
- ‹ Prev
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- Next ›
- Last »