Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bennett Coleman & Company Limited vs.m. Akram Pasha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 828/2018 & I.A. 5748/2018 BENNETT COLEMAN & COMPANY LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kr. Shashank Shekhar with Mr.Kunal Tandon and Mr.Shashank Shekhar, Advocates. versus ..... Defendant Through: None M. AKRAM PASHA % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:08. h August, 2018 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A.No.10584/2018 1. Today, in court learned counsel for the plaintiff has filed an application under Order XIIIA, Rules 2, 4 & 6 of CPC seeking summary judgment. The same has been numbered by the Registry. Since the defendant is ex parte, the said application is taken up for hearing and disposal.2. It is pertinent to mention that the present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark and copyright, passing off and trademark dilution, rendition of accounts of profit, damages, delivery up, etc. The prayer clause is reproduced hereinbelow:-"CS (COMM) 828/2018 Page 1 of 8 (a) ...
Harkirat Singh Sodhi vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~OS-19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + TEST.CAS. 38/2014 HARKIRAT SINGH SODHI Date of decision:08. 08.2018 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Lalit Gupta, Ms.Piyusha Singh and Mr.Nilind Jain, Advs. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sashank S.Tiwari, Adv. Mr.S.K.Tripahti, ASC for GNCTD Mr.Ved Prakash Sharma, Ms.Amrit Kaur Oberoi, Mr.Siddharth Bhardwaj and Ms.Abha Sharma, Advs. for the respondents. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) O.A. No.50/2018 1. This appeal is filed by the petitioner seeking to impugn the order dated 06.04.2018 passed by the Joint Registrar dismissing the application of the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC for placing on record necessary/relevant documents.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/appellant has filed the present petition for grant of probate of the registered Will of his mother, namely, Late Smt.Surinder Kaur Sodhi dated 13.01.1987. Respondent No.2 who is the si...
Karnika Sawhney vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :7. h August, 2018 Date of decision :8. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1630/2015 KARNIKA SAWHNEY ........ Petitioner Through : Mr BB Sawhney, Sr. Adv. with Indira Sawhney, Mr. Ms. Vaibhav Mishra, Yogendar Singh, Adv. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Monika Arora, Adv. with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE For judgment, see W.P.(C)No.10498/2009. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AUGUST08 2018/mk C.HARI SHANKAR, J...
Srijana Shrestha vs.khajan Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h JULY, 2018 Pronounced on:08. h AUGUST, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3886/2015 & Crl.M.A. No.13819/2015 SRIJANA SHRESTHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anoop George Chaudhari, Senior Advocate with Mr. Javedur Rahaman, Advocate. versus KHAJAN SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Mr. Philonoon Kani, Mr. A. Behura, Advocates Ms. Kriti Handa & Ms. Hansika Sahu, Advocates for CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER1 The petitioner describes himself as an advocate practising in the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur. He, joining with the sixth respondent, had submitted an application before the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), New Delhi registered as Application no.01/2013 on 08.07.2013, seeking to invoke the jurisdiction of the said court under Section 156(3) of the Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) to seek investigation into certain offences allegedly committed by the Crl.MC...
People for Animals & Anr. Vs.md Mohazzim & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2051/2015 and Crl. M.A. 7294/2015 PEOPLE FOR ANIMALS & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Satyam Thareja, Advocate versus MD MOHAZZIM & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Imtiaz Ahmed, Mrs. Naghma Imtiaz and Ms. Azna Rehan, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Subhash Chand, PS Lajpat Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner describes itself as a philanthropist organization doing work in the field of prevention of cruelty towards animals and for their general welfare. It has come up to this court invoking its inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India to challenge the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate, as confirmed in revision by the court of Sessions, releasing a set of birds to the first respondent (accused) in the corresponding criminal case for i...
Vishnu P Das vs.b K Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:08. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 121/2015 & Crl.M.A. 545/2015 VISHNU P DAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abir Phukan & Ms. Sonali Jain, Advs. versus B K SINGH ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER On the criminal complaint (CC no.53/01/12) instituted by the respondent, the petitioner was summoned as an accused to be put on trial for the offence punishable under Section 500 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 28.03.2014.2. The petitioner has approached this court invoking the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) and Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeking quashing of the said proceedings on the plea that the same are in the nature of abuse of the process of law. Crl. M.C. 121/2015 Page 1 of 8 3. The petition has been resisted by the respondent who argues...
Yashpal Sachdeva& Anr vs.sunil Relli & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 5191/2015 YASHPAL SACHDEVA& ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Arjun Malik, Advocate versus SUNIL RELLI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.K. Pahuja, Adv. for R-1 Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (no.12/1) of 2012 presented as an application under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC), the Metropolitan Magistrate, while declining a direction to the police to investigate by order dated 16.07.2012, opted to hold pre-summoning inquiry presumably under Sections 200 / 202 Cr. PC and called upon the first respondent (complainant) to adduce evidence. The complainant examined three witnesses at that stage, they including his wife Sunita Relli (CW-1), his mother Shanti Devi (CW-2) and the complainant himself (CW-3). Thereafter, the Magistrate proceeded to consider the said material and, by order d...
Manoj Arora vs.mamta Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.522/2017 and C.M. No.19306/2017(stay) + % MANOJ ARORA MAMTA ARORA7h August, 2018 Through: Mr. M. Sufian ..... Appellant Siddiqui, Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Bhugra, with appellant in person. Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate with Ms. Akshita Chhatwal, Advocate and Mr. Anirudh Ahuja, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 19.12.2016 by which trial court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC by RFA5222017 Page 1 of 6 applying provisions of Sections 4 read with repealed Section 3(2) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988.2. The subject suit was filed by the appellant/plaintiff/husband pleading tha...
Rajinder Kumar vs.council of Architecture & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1787/2017 & CM No.7906/2017 RAJINDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ankit Parmar and Mr Saurabh Seth, Advocates. versus COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Hetu Arora Sethi, Advocate for R-1. Mr Amit Bhagat and Ms Arushi Anthwal, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0708.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the report dated 08.08.2016 (hereafter the impugned report) submitted by the Disciplinary Committee of respondent no.1 (the Council of Architecture hereafter the Council). The Disciplinary Committee has found the petitioner guilty of violation of Regulation 2(1)(viii) of the Architects (Professional Conduct) Regulations, 1989. The said clause W.P.(C) 1787/2017 Page 1 of 9 requires an Architect to maintain a high standard of integrity.2. The disciplinary proceedings against the...
All India Punjab National Bank Officers’ Association vs.union of Ind ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 1387/2016 & CM No.6050/2016 ALL INDIA PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Garg, Mr. K.K. Aggarwal & Mr. Ayush Aggarwal, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Santosh Kr. Pandey, Advocates for UOI Mr. Rajesh Kumar & Mr. V. Govinda Ramanan, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0708.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner an Association of Employees (Officers) of respondent no.2 bank (hereafter PNB) has filed the present petition impugning the communication dated 12.10.2015 (hereafter the impugned communication) issued by respondent no.1. The impugned communication is issued in the context of nomination of officer employees and workmen employees to be appointed as directors on the board of public sector banks. By the impugned communication, respondent no.1 has clarified that the names of only those...
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »