Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bses Rajdhani Power Limited vs.usha Shoken & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:7. h August, 2018 CRL.L.P. 514/2018 BSES RAJSHANI POWER LIMITED ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Advocate alongwith Ms. Jaya Verma (Office of BSES Rajdhani Power Limited) versus USHA SHOKEN & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.29447-448/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.L.P. 514/2018 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 9th May, 2018 whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, acquitted the respondent No.1 for the offence punishable under Sectionread with Section 150 Electricity Act, 2003, and respondent No.2 for the offence punishable under SectionElectricity Act, 2003, the petitioner/complainant has preferred the present leave petition.2. The facts leading to the present case are that on 22nd January 2009 at 2:10 P.M., an inspection was carried out by the inspection team of the complainant ...
Govt of National Capital Territory of Delhi vs.saroj Devi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:7. h August, 2018 LPA1112018 GOVT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr Kanishk Rana, Adv versus SAROJ DEVI & ANR Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM Nos. 110046/2018 and 10313/2018 (exemptions) Exemptions are allowed subject to just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. CM No.10045/2018 (delay in filing) and CM No.110047/2018 (delay in re-filing) 1. These are the applications filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 308 days delay in filing and 16 days delay in re-filing the appeal. The counsel for the applicant submits that the delay was caused for reasons beyond the control of the applicant, for bona-fide reasons and not on account of any carelessness or in action. He relies on the chart prepared which forms part of the application showing the...
Ajay Jain vs.akshay Kumar Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % AJAY JAIN RFA No.633/2018 7th August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Gupta and Ms. P. Gupta, Advocates. versus AKSHAY KUMAR AGGARWAL CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.31601/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.31650/2018 (for delay) 2. For the reason stated in the application the delays of 11 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned, subject to just exceptions. C.Ms. stand disposed of. RFA No.633/2018 Page 1 of 7 RFA No.633/2018 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 31599-31600/2018 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 1.3.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for recovery of Rs. 7,75,000/- along with interest at 6% per ann...
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.navdeep Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 07, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Varun Sarin and Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates Versus + MAC.APP. 971/2016 NAVDEEP SINGH LAKHVINDER SINGH & ORS. (M/S NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for + MAC.APP. 1077/2016 Insurer 1. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus NAVDEEP SINGH AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Varun Sarin and Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 25th July, 2016 grants compensation of `65,20,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum to injured- Navdeep Singh, aged 19 years, on account of grievous injuries sustained by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 13th August, 2010. MAC.APP. 971/2016 MAC.APP. 1077/2016 Page 1 of 10 2. In the above captioned first appeal, Injured seeks enhancement in quantum of compensation awarded, whereas ...
Kamlesh Aggarwal vs.vijay & Ors (The New India Assurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 07, 2018 + MAC.APP. 219/2016 & CMs 8544/16, 173+ MAC.APP. 220/2016 & CMs 8547/16, 17403-04/16, 137+ MAC.APP. 221/2016 & CMs 8550/16, 17406-07/16, 137THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates versus KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ORS KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ORS ARJUN AGGARWAL & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Yogesh Narula, Advocates for respondents-Claimants + MAC.APP. 252/2016 + MAC.APP. 253/2016 + MAC.APP. 254/2016 ARJUN AGGARWAL KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ANR. KAMLESH AGGARWAL ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Yogesh Narula, Advocates versus VIJAY & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates for Insurer .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MAC.APP.220/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned six appeals arise out of one vehicular ...
India Infoline Ltd. & Anr vs.dana Singh Bisht
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h August, 2018. RSA1892016 & CM No.25911/2016 (for stay) INDIA INFOLINE LTD. & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Mukesh M. Goel, Mr. Dilip Kumar Arya, Advs. with Mr. Pradeep Mandal, AR of appellants. ..... Respondent Versus DANA SINGH BISHT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: None. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 26th February, 2016 in RCA No.54/2015 (UID No.02401C0358562015) of the Court of Additional District Judge-02 (Central)]. of dismissal of the First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC filed by the two appellants against the judgment and decree [dated 20th April, 2015 in Suit No.59/2013 of the Court of Civil Judge-3 (West)]. in favour of the respondent/plaintiff and against the appellants/defendants of recovery of the value of the shares which was in the account of the respondent/plaintiff with the app...
Phoolwati vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~29 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"7th August, 2018 CRL.M.C. 1789/2016 PHOOLWATI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Satyam Sisodia with Mr. versus Manish Awasthi & Ms. Babita Ahlawat, Advocates. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for State. Mr. Ravin Rao with Mr. Ankit Goel, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed a criminal complaint case (CC No.22/01/14) in the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, North-West District, alleging offences punishable under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B/34 IPC having been committed against her by the private party respondents. Along with the said complaint case, she made a prayer for directions to the police to register an FIR and investigate under Section 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The Metropolitan Magistrate called for an action taken report from the police with reference to the complaints that had bee...
Subhash Chand Jain & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3949/2018 SUBHASH CHAND JAIN & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Rakesh Malviya with Mr. Gaurav Soni and Mr. Karanveer Choudhary, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State. SI Amit Kumar, PS Amar Colony. JUDGMENT0708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 29429/2018 (Exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL. M.C. 3949/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.328/2017 under Sections 420/4IPC, Police Station Amar Colony, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 3949/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. As per the allegations in the FIR, the petitioners as well as complainant have entered into a joint venture for running a chemist shop. Subsequently, as per the allegations in the FIR, the petitioners took a loan from the I...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.kamlesh Aggarwal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 07, 2018 + MAC.APP. 219/2016 & CMs 8544/16, 173+ MAC.APP. 220/2016 & CMs 8547/16, 17403-04/16, 137+ MAC.APP. 221/2016 & CMs 8550/16, 17406-07/16, 137THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates versus KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ORS KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ORS ARJUN AGGARWAL & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Yogesh Narula, Advocates for respondents-Claimants + MAC.APP. 252/2016 + MAC.APP. 253/2016 + MAC.APP. 254/2016 ARJUN AGGARWAL KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ANR. KAMLESH AGGARWAL ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Yogesh Narula, Advocates versus VIJAY & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates for Insurer .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MAC.APP.220/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned six appeals arise out of one vehicular ...
Rajendra Mishra vs.pramod Nischal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"7th August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3343/2015 and Crl.M.A.11946/2015 RAJENDRA MISHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Tamta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Udayan Khandelwal, Advocate versus PRAMOD NISCHAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Nischal, AR for the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner stands summoned as an accused before the court of Metropolitan Magistrate in terms of order dated 18.04.2015 passed on the criminal complaint dated 15.04.2015 of the respondent (the complainant) alleging offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in relation to a cheque No.347241 dated 20.02.2015 for Rs.30,000/- drawn against his account with Axis Bank Limited, Vasant Kunj, new Delhi-110 070. He has approached this court by the petition at hand invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to see...
- ‹ Prev
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- Next ›
- Last »