Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Vanasthali Investments Private Limited vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~14 & 15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"7th August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3529/2015 & Crl.M.A. 12562/2015 M/S VANASTHALI INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Mr. Hemant & Mr. Ankit Bhatia, Advs. versus STATE & ORS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.M.C. 3530/2015 State. M/S VANASTHALI INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Mr. Hemant & Mr. Ankit Bhatia, Advs. versus STATE & ORS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the ........ RESPONDENTS State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) Crl. M.C. No.3529/2015 & conn. Page 1 of 6 1. Both these petitions have been filed invoking the inherent power of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India to raise questions as to the correctness, legality and propriety of similar orders passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate on 21.07.201...
Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. & Anr. Vs.gyanji Choudhary & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~23 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:07. h August, 2018 RFA(OS) 94/2016 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD. & ANR. Through Mr. Pravin Anand and Mr. Nishchal Anand, Advocates ..... Appellants versus GYANJI CHOUDHARY & ANR. Through Nemo ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 07.09.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by which the suit filed by the appellant herein has been dismissed for non-prosecution, as no evidence was led to prove issues which were framed in the matter.2. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of the present appeal are that the appellant had filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement and dilution of trade marks, passing off, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the respondents. The appellant is a registered pr...
Radha vs.food and Civil Supplies Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) No.3642/2015 Judgment reserved on :19. h July, 2017 Date of decision :7. h August, 2018 RADHA Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal and ........ Petitioner Mr.Ashutosh Dixit, Advocates Versus FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT .. Respondent Through: Mr.Imran Majid with Mr.Arun Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner Smt. Radha Devi vide the present petition seeks the setting aside of the impugned award dated 5.3.2015 of the Presiding Officer Labour Court-XVII, Karkardooma, Delhi in DID No.56/10, Unique ID No.02402C0149092010 vide which whilst holding that the respondent had not been able to prove that the petitioners services with the respondent, i.e., the Food & Civil Supplies Department, which were availed of by the respondent were on contractual basis for a limited period and that the respondent fell within the ambit of Industry in terms of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Ac...
Navdeep Singh vs.lakhvinder Singh & Ors. (M/S National Insurance Co Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 07, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Varun Sarin and Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates Versus + MAC.APP. 971/2016 NAVDEEP SINGH LAKHVINDER SINGH & ORS. (M/S NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for + MAC.APP. 1077/2016 Insurer 1. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus NAVDEEP SINGH AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Varun Sarin and Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 25th July, 2016 grants compensation of `65,20,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum to injured- Navdeep Singh, aged 19 years, on account of grievous injuries sustained by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 13th August, 2010. MAC.APP. 971/2016 MAC.APP. 1077/2016 Page 1 of 10 2. In the above captioned first appeal, Injured seeks enhancement in quantum of compensation awarded, whereas ...
Kamlesh Aggarwal & Anr. Vs.vijay & Ors (The New India Assurance Co Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 07, 2018 + MAC.APP. 219/2016 & CMs 8544/16, 173+ MAC.APP. 220/2016 & CMs 8547/16, 17403-04/16, 137+ MAC.APP. 221/2016 & CMs 8550/16, 17406-07/16, 137THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates versus KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ORS KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ORS ARJUN AGGARWAL & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Yogesh Narula, Advocates for respondents-Claimants + MAC.APP. 252/2016 + MAC.APP. 253/2016 + MAC.APP. 254/2016 ARJUN AGGARWAL KAMLESH AGGARWAL & ANR. KAMLESH AGGARWAL ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Yogesh Narula, Advocates versus VIJAY & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates for Insurer .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MAC.APP.220/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned six appeals arise out of one vehicular ...
Kishan Dubey vs.mukesh Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h August, 2018 RSA672018, 16792/2018 (for stay) and CM No.16794/2018 (for condonation of 46 days delay in refiling the appeal). KISHAN DUBEY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Adv. versus Through: None. MUKESH GUPTA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.16793/2019 (for exemption). ..... Respondent 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RSA672018, 16792/2018 (for stay) and CM No.16794/2018 (for condonation of 46 days delay in refiling the appeal).3. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 5th January, 2018 in RCA No.98/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge-I (North- East)]. allowing the First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the judgment and decree [dated 24th October, 2016 in CS No.53of the Court of Administrative Civil Judg...
Rajinder Mehra vs.rajesh Tuli and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~59 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:7. h August, 2018 FAO(OS) 335/2016 RAJINDER MEHRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Arvind Bhatt and Mr.Kuber Giri, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus RAJESH TULI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC and for Advocate Mr.T.P. Singh, respondent/L&DO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 05.09.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, by which an application being I.A. No.2697/2016 filed under Section 151 CPC has been rejected.2. In this case, probate of a will of late Sh.Vidya Bhushan Mehra who died on 30.09.1984 was granted on 28.01.1985. Post the grant of probate the appellant had approached the L&DO for mutation of the property. L&DO called upon the appellant/applicant Rajinder Mehra to file an affidavit of the Executor of the Will stating that he ha...
Naveen Singh vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 917/2018 Judgment delivered on:07. 08.2018 NAVEEN SINGH versus THE STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Rana Kunal and Mr.Sanjeev Malik, Advs. For the Respondent: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP with SI Jitendra Negi, P.S.Neb Sarai. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.146/2018 under Section 376/506/336 IPC Police Station Neb Sarai. As per the allegations in the FIR, petitioner is alleged to have committed the offence of rape on the prosecutrix several years prior to the lodging of the FIR and is alleged to have repeated the same several times. As per the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C, the last time the BAIL APPLN. 917/2018 Page 1 of 3 offence is alleged to have been committed was six months prior to registration of the FIR. It is further alleged th...
M/S Ram Abhoshan vs.m/s Pec Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$-17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h August, 2018 + O.M.P. 444/2015 M/S RAM ABHOSHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.J.M.Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Neil Hildreth, Mr.Rahul Jain, Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advs. versus M/S PEC LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Mr.G.K.Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the Arbitral Award dated 28th April, 2015 passed by the majority of the members of the Arbitral Tribunal dismissing the claim of the petitioner.2. The disputes between the parties have arisen out of the Tender No.PEC/Gold Del/20:80/2014-15/Lot-8 dated 12th May, 2014 floated by the respondent with respect to Net Trading Margin on Sale of Gold by PEC to be imported in 8th Lot of 337 kg. under 20:80 scheme of RBI".3. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide its Circular dated 14th August, 2013 had clarified its inst...
Rumal Bharti vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
$~16 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"7th August, 2018 CRL. M.C. 3923/2015 RUMAL BHARTI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Trideep Pais & Mr. Pranav versus Jain, Advs. STATE & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State. Mr. Vimal Puggal, Adv. for R- 4, 5 & 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had approached the court of Metropolitan Magistrate by application (CC No.996/4/2015) seeking direction for investigation by the police into the allegations made by him against the private party respondents, they, in his submission, making out a case involving offences punishable under Sections 120B, 415, 420, 425, 447, 448, 454, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The Metropolitan Magistrate, by her order dated 14.05.2015, was of the view that the averments in the said application primarily revealed civil dispute, it being subject matter of a pending civil litigation. As regards the allegations ...
- ‹ Prev
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- Next ›
- Last »