Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.dcm Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:07. 09.2017 Judgment delivered on:30. 08.2018 LPA4872017 and C.M. No.25528/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Mr. Kapil Dutta & Ms. Diksha Lal, Advocates. versus DCM LIMITED & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Pratik Malik, Mr.Vaibhav Mishra & Ms. Akriti Tyagi, Advocates respondent No.1/ DCM Ltd. for Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel and Mr. Harshit Maniktala, Ms. Isha Garg & Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates for respondent No.2/ DDA. Mr. P.C. Sharma, Advocate along with Mr. Ramesh Nag, Coordinator, of respondent No.2 Monitoring Committee of Supreme Court of India. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT LPA4872017 Page 1 of 46 VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal to assail the order dated 26.05.2017 passed by th...
Jeet Singh and Others vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~38 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 9247/2017 JEET SINGH AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.S.K. Rout with Mr.Aman Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advs for LAC/L&B. Mr.Kunal Sharma, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioners, admeasuring 20 Bighas comprised in Khasra No.4//2situated in the revenue estate of Village Sahipur, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as '2...
India Tourism Development Corporation Limited vs.m/s Mayar Health Reso ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~32 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h August, 2018. INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED O.M.P. 389/2009 Through: Mr. Ravi Sikri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neelesh Sinha and Ms. Sishani Singh, Advocates. (M:9717462905) ........ Petitioner M/S MAYAR HEALTH RESORT LTD versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manjula Gandhi, Mr. Shivanshu Kumar and Mr. Aditya Kapoor, Advocates. (M:9044888880) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ( hereinafter, the Act) challenging the award dated 6th April, 2009 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator, Mr. L. C. Jain.2. The brief background is that the Respondent had taken space in the Ashoka Hotel for setting up a Spa and Health Club in technical assistance with M/s. Serena Spa Pvt. Ltd., as per license deed dated 1st September, 2003 for a period of 10 years, commencing from 1st March, 2004. Th...
M/S Vrs Foods Ltd vs.prem Chand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h August, 2018. M/S VRS FOODS LTD CS (COMM) 365/2016 & I.A. 19499/2014 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. S. K. Bansal, Mr. Pankaj Kumar and Mr. Vinay K. Shukla, Advocates. (M:9810017859) PREM CHAND CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH versus Through: None. ..... Defendant Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking permanent injunction and damages in respect of the trademark PARAS. The case of the Plaintiff is that the Plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trademark PARAS. It adopted the said mark in 1987 in respect of milk and milk products. The details of adoption have been pleaded in the paragraphs 5 & 6 of the plaint. The trademark PARAS as a word mark and the label are registered under the provisions of the Trademarks Act, 1999 and the Copyright Act, 1956. Mr. Bansal, learned counsel for Plaintiff submits that the Defendant adopted the mark `PARAS AND PARAS GOLD for manufact...
Vinod Kumar vs.university of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
#4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2644/2018 VINOD KUMAR versus Judgment delivered on:30. 08.2018 ........ Petitioner UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: Sanjay For the... Petitioner: Mr. Sharawat, Mr. Kashul Sharma, Advocates. Mr. Harsh Ahuja and For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Seema Dolo, Advocates for respondent No.1/ University of Delhi. Mr. Ankur Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates for Rajdhani College. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articleof the Constitution of India, has been instituted on behalf of a student of Rajdhani College, seeking a direction to the latter, as well as, to the University of Delhi, to update the result of Inorganic Chemistry III (Paper Code 217401). W.P.(C)2644/2018 Page 1 of 4 2. A perusal of the record reveals that, the petitioner has cleared all the 24 theory papers as were required to obtain...
Manju Gupta vs.pankaj Gupta & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h August, 2018 + Crl.M.C. 2082/2016 & Crl.M.A. 8823-24/2016 MANJU GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Bhatia & Mr. Vivek Singh, Advs. versus PANKAJ GUPTA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Vijay Lakshmi, Adv. for R Mr. Saurabh Bhargav, Mr. Khoda Apa & Ms. Shwetha Sharma, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner was married to Pankaj Gupta (the first respondent) on 06.12.1985 and they have a male child Pranav Gupta as part of family. Concededly, the parties had lived in a portion of property bearing No.47/35, Punjabi Bagh West, New Delhi for some time. Concededly again, the marriage ran into rough weather and this resulted in an estranged relationship and matrimonial dispute, eventually resulting in a petition (CC No.66/1/2014) being filed under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 by the petitioner impleading the said husband Pankaj ...
Saleem & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4396/2018 Judgment delivered on:30. 08.2018 SALEEM & ORS versus ........ Petitioners STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Harender Kumar, Adv. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State with ASI Surinder Dutt, P.S.Hari Nagar. Mr. Siddharth Narang, Advocate for respondent No.2. JUDGMENT3008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.31006/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL. M.C. 4396/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.208/2017 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Hari Nagar.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. CRL.M.C. 4396/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the disputes between the parties have been settled before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Court dated 05.12.2017. The p...
Dhyan Singh and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 30, 2018 + W.P.(C) 378/2017 DHYAN SINGH AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Puri, Mr. Aditya Bali, Ms. Tanya Chawla & ms. Neha Bhutani, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Saakshi Agrawal, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhanesh Relhan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Kajri Gupta, Ms. Komal Sorout & ms. Aprajita, Advocates for respondent No.2-DDA Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for respondents No.3-LAC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners seek a mandamus to respondent to hand over the title 1. documents of Khasra Nos. 207/2(4-16), 108/2(2-17), 89/1(0-06), 253 (1- 13), 312 (3-15), 255 (1-07) totaling Raqba/area 14-14 in village Kondli, Shahadra Circle, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) while relying upon Rule 354 of the Delhi Land Revenue Rules, 1962. Dema...
Jeet Singh and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~38 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 9247/2017 JEET SINGH AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.S.K. Rout with Mr.Aman Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advs for LAC/L&B. Mr.Kunal Sharma, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioners, admeasuring 20 Bighas comprised in Khasra No.4//2situated in the revenue estate of Village Sahipur, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as '2...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s Chirag Security & Placement Service ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h August, 2018 + O.M.P. 526/2008 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jyotindra Kumar & Mr. A.K. Verma, Advocates (M-8587815809). versus M/S CHIRAG SECURITY & PLACEMENT SERVICES Through: Mr. Malaya Chand, Advocate (M- ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH981050525). Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 4577/2017 (Delay in filing Restoration Application) 1. This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 101 days in filing of I.A. 4576/2017 for restoration of the petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned.2. I.A. is allowed. I.A. 4576/2017 (Restoration Application) 3. This is an application seeking restoration of OMP5262008 which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 2nd December, 2016. For the reasons stated in the application, OMP5262008 is restored.4. I.A. is allowed. O.M.P. 526/2008 5. The present petition has been filed under Section 34 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »