Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dinesh Dass vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~R-10. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 08.2018 * + % CRL.A. 421/2017 DINESH DASS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.B. Dandapani, Advocate Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 07.01.2017 rendered by the learned ASJ/Pilot Court/ North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in SC No.57615/2016 arising out of FIR No.123/2012 under Section 302 IPC registered at PS Bawana. The appellant stands convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.10,000/-. In default of CRL.A. 421/2017 Page 1 of 13 payment of fine, he has been directed to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month.2. The Trial Court has noticed the relevant background facts in para 1 of the impugned judgment. We produce the same here under: On 09.04.2012 at 7:40 am an inform...
Charan Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: August 29, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4747/2018 CHARAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocate Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) C.M. 35041/2018 (u/S151CPC) By way of this application, petitioner prays for condonation of delay in filing the additional affidavit in terms of last order. Upon hearing, I find that sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay occasioned. The application is allowed and additional affidavit filed along with this application is taken on record. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 4747/2018 1. Impugned order of 8th August, 2014 (Annexure P-1) rejects petitioners application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land on the ground that following documents have not been submitted:-"W.P.(C) 4747/2018 Page 1 of 2 i. Surviving Member Certificate ii. R...
Anish Ali vs.the State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~7 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4198/2018 CHHUTKA & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE & ANR + CRL.M.C. 4200/2018 ANISH ALI THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. D.K. Singh, Mr. Pankaj Chauhan, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Ms. Savita Singh and Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, Advs. (Crl. M.C. 4198/2018) Mr. Satwant, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 4200/2018) for R-2 Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Vipin Kumar Mr. Satwant, Adv. 4198/2018) for R-2 (Crl. M.C. Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Vipin Kumar Mr. D.K. Singh, Mr. Pankaj Chauhan, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Ms. Savita Singh and Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, Advs. (Crl. M.C. 4200/2018) for R-2 CRL.M.C. 4198/2018 & 4200/2018 Page 1 of 4 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL...
Saraswati Educational Charitable Trust and Anr. Vs.union of India and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
#92 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 6842/2018, CM APPL259982018 SARASWATI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav Bhatia, Advocate with Mr. Utkarsh Jaishwal and Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocates For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Bhagwan Swarup, CGSC with Mr. Kamaldeep and Mr. Shravan Kumar Shukla, Advocate for UOI/R-1. Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Michelle Biakthansangi Das, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Mr. Tarun Verma, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty and Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocates for MCI/R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition is instituted on behalf of the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Although multiple W.P.(C)6842/2018 Page 1 of 11 reliefs have been prayed for therein, Mr. Ga...
Ritu Saxena vs.j.s.grover and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RITU SAXENA Review Petition 328/2018 in RFA5182018 29th August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mandeep Singh Vinaik, Ms. Anjali Sharma and Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocates. (9810001275) versus J.S.GROVER AND ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.35096/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. Review Petition 328/2018 in RFA5182018 1. This Review Petition is filed by the appellant/plaintiff seeking review of the Judgment passed by this Court on 17.7.2018, and as corrected vide order dated 1.8.2018, and thereby for allowing RFA No.518/2018 Page 1 of 9 the first appeal filed by the appellant/plaintiff, and which was dismissed by the impugned Judgment dated 17.7.2018.2. Actually, the present review petition is, besides being a Review Petition, also a petition seeking correction of clerical err...
Amit Sharma vs.mohit Shokeen
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 5147/2015 and Crl. M.As.18538-18539/2015 AMIT SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Aggarwal, Ms. Runul Rastogi and Ms. Sudha, Advocates versus MOHIT SHOKEEN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar and Mr. Manoj Gera, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner was summoned by the Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 07.05.2014 in complaint case (no.CC3321) instituted by the respondent alleging offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. He challenged the said summoning order before the court of Sessions by Criminal Revision No.9which was dismissed by order dated 26.08.2015. The prime contention urged by him is with reference to prayer clause (b) in the complaint case indicating that against the cheque of Rs.3,50,000/-, an amount of Rs.2,30,000/- had remained outstanding, Rs.1,20,000/- Crl. M.C. No.5147/2015 Page 1 of 2 having been ...
Abhishek Verma vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA3282018 ABHISHEK VERMA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Umesh Sharma, Advocate. versus CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Akanksha Mishra, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Arunav Patnaik with Ms. Kanika Singh, Advocates for R-3. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER2908.2018 % CM APPL247462018 (delay in re-filing) 1. This application has been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking 2.3. condonation of 45 days delay in re-filing the present appeal. Notice. Counsels for the non-applicants accept notice. The prayer made in this application is not opposed. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Delay of 45 days delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned.4. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL247452018 (delay in filing) 5. This application has been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 4 days delay in filing the present appeal. Not...
Mool Singh & Anr vs.lt Governor of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA4942018 Date of decision:29. h August, 2018 MOOL SINGH & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Drishti Singh Rathore & Mr. Rakesh Saini, Advs. Versus LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Sangita Rai, Adv. With Mr.Pradeep Singh Tomar, Adv. for R-1, 3 to 7 Ms. Ruchi Jain, Adv. with Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmad, Adv. for R-2/UOI Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for R-8/EDMC with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan & Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advs. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, SC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for R-9 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT Rajendra Menon, Chief Justice (Oral) C.M.No.34934/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.Ms.No.34933/2018 (delay in filing) & C.M.No.34935/2018 (delay in re- filling) For the the reasons stated in the applications, delay in filing as well as re-filing is condoned and the applications are disposed of. LPA4942018 Page ...
Smt. Shanti Devi vs.land and Building Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 29, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6160/2018 1. SMT. SHANTI DEVI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal and Mr. Amit Dhankhar, Advocates Versus LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 1st February, 2017 rejects petitioners application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land on the ground that the requisite documents have not been supplied.2. Learned counsel for petitioner draws attention of this Court to petitioners letter of 28th October, 2016 (Annexure P-7) wherein petitioner had sought time to obtain and furnish the requisite documents. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that after the receipt of the requisite documents, the same have been supplied to respondent on 2nd February, 2017 and the proof of submission has been handed over by petitioners counsel to the Co...
Kartik Singh Sawhney vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
#63,70,71 & 72 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8207/2018 PRIYANK SHRARMA versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 8247/2018 MAHESH KUMAR (MINOR) THROUGH HIS FATHER BHOOP SINGH GURJAR ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 8248/2018 SANCHIT KAPOOR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. W.P.(C) 8252/2018 KARTIK SINGH SAWHNEY versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 8207/2018, W.P.(C) 8247/2018, W.P.(C) 8248/2018 & W.P.(C) 8252/2018 Page 1 of 6 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Manu Beri, Mr. Prasenjit Keswani and Mr. Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 8207/2018 Mr. Jeetender Gupta, Advocate in W.P.(C) 8247/2018, 8248/2018 & 8252/20 Mr. Ruchir Mishra, and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates for UOI Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and M...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »