Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Veena Jatav vs.state of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~56 * + W.P.(C) 9084/2018 & CM No.34966/2018 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. VEENA JATAV versus Through: Mr Apurb Lal, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Devesh Singh, ASC ........ RESPONDENTS (Civil), GNCTD with Ms Sukriti Ghai, Advocate for R-1 to R-3. Mr Devendra Kumar, Tehsildar (Kotwali) with Mr Sanjay Bhardwaj, Reater to SDM (Kotwali). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2908.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the caste certified issued to respondent no.2 (Smt Guddi Devi) be quashed. The petitioner also impugns the inquiry report (hereafter the impugned report) submitted by respondent no.4 (SDM Kotwali).2. The petitioner states that respondent no.2 has illegally obtained a Scheduled Caste certificate (SC certificate) certifying that she belongs to Jatava Caste. The said certificate was issued by the Executive Magistrate (Kotwali) on the basis of a SC certificate is...
M/S Medico Abroad vs.m/s Ism Focal Point
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~ O-12 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h August, 2018 + EX.P. 440/2014 with R.P.248/2016, Ex.APPL.(OS) 203/2017 & Crl.M.A.7449/2017 M/S MEDICO ABROAD ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. Soumik Ghosal with Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advs. versus M/S ISM FOCAL POINT ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Suprabh Kumar Roshan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The decree holder filed the Execution Petition 440/2014 against the judgment debtor to seek execution of the arbitration award dated 18th December, 2010 in which the learned Arbitrator awarded a sum of Rs.69,57,720/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum to the decree holder.2. The decree holder stated in the execution petition that the judgment debtor has an office at C-93, Anand Niketan, Dolapur, New Delhi and the decree be executed by attachment/sale of the movable properties of the judgment debtor mentioned in Annexure - A2, namely computers, air conditioners, steel almir...
M/S. R K Impex vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 7367/2016 Judgment delivered on:29. 08.2018 M/S. R K IMPEX versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS :Dr G. K. Sarkar, Mrs Malabika Sarkar, Mr Prashant Srivastava and Mr Deepak Mahajan, Advocates. :Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. Mr O. P. Gaggar and Mr Gautam Krishna Deka, Advocates for R-2. Mr Satish Aggarwal, Advocate for R-3/DRI. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition being aggrieved by the action of respondent no.3 (hereafter DRI) freezing her current account No.307301010294199 maintained with respondent no.2 (Union Bank of Indias Branch located at Fatehpuri, Khari Baoli, Delhi hereafter UBI). By the letter dated 19.03.2014 (hereafter the impugned communication), the DRI had called upon UBI to not to permit any debit/withdrawal from the petitioners accou...
Rajeev Sharma & Anr. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 1422/2018 Judgment delivered on:29. 08.2018 RAJEEV SHARMA & ANR. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Mimanshu Sharma, Adv. along with petitioners Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Mahesh Singh Ms. Aditi Sharma, Adv. for complainant/R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.435 of 2003 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC, Police Station Pandav Nagar, New Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have 2. CRL.M.C. 1422/2018 Page 1 of 3 settled their disputes and petitioner No.1 and the complainant have been divorced by decree of divorce dated 14.12.2004. It is fu...
Icici Home Finance Co Ltd vs.manoj Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h August, 2018. + CS (COMM) 975/2016 & I.A. 6982/2017 ICICI HOME FINANCE CO LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Satish Kumar, Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocates. (Mob. 9811191050) versus MANOJ KUMAR & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Rahul Malhotra with Mr.Prabhakar Tiwari, Advocates. (Mob.8860553987) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff for recovery of a sum of Rs.2,21,47,283.74/- against the Defendants. The case of the Plaintiff is that it had sanctioned a loan for a sum of Rs.95,00,000/- to the Defendants No.1 to 3 for the purchase of a commercial space in the Defendant No.4s premises shop bearing No.G-12, Ground Floor, Uppals Element 9, Plot No.L, Sector 2, IMT, Manesar, Gurgaon-122001 (`suit property).2. The Defendant Nos.1 to 3 availed the loan facility for a sum of Rs.95,00,000/- towards the same. The loan was disbursed by the plaintiff and a paym...
Citigroup Inc & Anr vs.citicorp Business & Finance Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~ * + #3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 416/2018 CITIGROUP INC & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan Bajaj, Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Rupin Bahl and Mr. Dhruv Nayar, Advocates versus CITICORP BUSINESS & FINANCE PVT LTD & ANR Through Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Advocate. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Patnia and Mrs. Renu Patnia in person. ..... Defendants % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:29. h August, 2018 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Plaintiffs, namely Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A. have filed the present suit for injunction and damages for infringement of registered trade mark, passing off and unfair trade competition against the defendants for using the marks CitiCorp and Citi as essential and prominent part of their corporate names i.e., CitiCorp Business & Finance Pvt. Ltd. (Defendant no.1) and Citi Enterprises & Traders Pvt. Ltd. (Defendant no.2). CS(COMM) 416/2018 Page 1 of 6 2. Learned predecessors of this Court vide...
Baleshwar Sharma vs.nageshwar Pandey
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$-26 & 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29th August, 2018 + + ARB.P. 254/2015 OMP(I) 193/2015 BALESHWAR SHARMA Through: Mr.Rohit Kumar,Adv. ........ Petitioner versus NAGESHWAR PANDEY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv.with Mr.Satish Mahambrey, Ms.Sumati Sharma and Mr.Aditya Awasthi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) I.A. No.1450/2016 in OMP(I) 193/2015 The abovementioned application has already been dismissed vide order dated 25.02.2016 and is being wrongly shown in the cause list. I.A. No.5075/2018 in ARB.P.254/2015 I.A. No.5076/2018 in OMP(I) 193/2015 These applications are seeking condonation of delay in filing of the reply to the applications seeking revival of the petitions. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay is condoned and reply is taken on record. Applications stand allowed. ARBP.254/2015 & OMP (I)193/2015 Page 1 ARB.P. 254/2015 & I.A. No.571/2018 OMP(I) 193/2015 & I.A. No.567/201...
Kamla Sharma vs.rahul Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~J * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:29. 08.2018 RC REV.50/2016 KAMLA SHARMA Through Mr.Ajay Kumar, Adv. Petitioner Versus RAHUL GUPTA Through Mr.Vishesh Chauhan, Adv. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This revision petition is filed under section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 15.7.2015 by which the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC) allowed the application of the respondent/tenant granting leave to defend. The petitioner/landlord has filed the present Eviction Petition for property being one room/godown on the ground floor in the property being No.116-A, Kamla Nagar, Delhi-110007. It is the contention of the petitioner that she is the owner/landlord of the said one room/godown on the ground floor which was let out 15 years back by Smt.Vishnu Devi, the mother in law of the petitioner. The petitioner is...
Harindra Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~47 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2209/2018 and Crl. M.A. 7846-7849/2018 HARINDRA KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prem Prakash, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is facing criminal prosecution in case arising out of FIR no.1of police station Chitranjan Park on the charge for offences under Sections 323, 354, 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). He had moved an application for discharge. The Metropolitan Magistrate considered the said prayer but, by order dated 25.05.2015, found charges made out for offences under Sections 323, 354, 506 IPC.2. The petitioner challenged the said order in the court of Sessions by Criminal Revision no.204429/2016, his contention primarily being that it is a case of honey trap. The revisional court found no merit Crl. M.C. No.2209/2018 Page 1 of 3 in his submissions and di...
Smt. Anita Vig & Anr vs.sh. Joginder Khanna & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~OS-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 08.2018 CS(OS) 323/2017 SMT. ANITA VIG & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Ms.Bhawna Chopra Rustogi, Adv. Versus SH. JOGINDER KHANNA & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Naveen Dabas, Adv. for D-1 Mr.Gaurav Kakar, Adv. for D-2. Mr.Abhimanyu Singh Khatri, Adv. with Mr.Ankit Panwar, Adv. for D- 4/MCD North Mr.Kaushik Mishra, Adv.for D-5. Mr.Dhruv Tamta, Adv. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH % + JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.1898/2018 1. This application is filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint by defendant No.5.2. The brief facts of this case have already been stated by this court in its order dated 12.02.2018 which reads as follows:-"2. The plaintiffs, being the sisters of the defendants no.1 and 2 viz. Joginder Khanna and Pawan Khanna, have instituted this suit for i) declaration that the Conveyance Deed dated 26th July, 2001 executed by defendant no.3 Delhi Development Authority (DDA) i...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »