Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc vs.cbn News Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~OS-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CS(COMM) 815/2017 Date of Decision:30. 08.2018 THE CHRISTIAN BROADCASTING NETWORK, INC..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Manish Dhir and Mr.Sharabh Shrivastava Adv. Versus CBN NEWS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through Ms.Sweta Badola, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction, restraining passing-off, rendition of accounts and damages against the defendant, its partners, employees, etc from marketing, promoting and advertising the offending trade mark CBN NEWS/CBN/ CBN formative mark and any other mark of the plaintiff which is being used either as a trademark/ trade name/ domain name or in any other manner whatsoever that may amount to passing off its services/ project of the plaintiff. Other connected reliefs are also sought.2. It is contended in the plaint that plaintiff is a corporation renowned under its news channel known as CBN NEWS w...
Vedanta Ltd vs.shenzhen Shandong Nuclear Power Construction Company Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:03. 05.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:30.08.2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 35/2018 & CM APPLS. 8307/2018 & 11962/2018 VEDANTA LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Chidambaram, Sr. Adv., Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai, Ms. Vasudha Sen, Mr. Arjun Asthana & Mr. Parinay T. Vasandand, Advs. versus SHENZHEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD SHANDONG Through: Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Adv. with NUCLEAR POWER ..... Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ranjit Prakash, Mr. Kamal Nijhawan, Mr. Anshuman Pande & Ms. Mahima Sareen, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. This appeal, by Vedanta Ltd (hereafter Vedanta) under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) questions the judgment of a learned single judge, dismissing its petition under Section 34 of that Act. The petition challenged the award of an arbitral tribunal...
Bhanwar Singh & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30.08.2018 CRL.REV.P. 323/2017 BHANWAR SINGH & ORS versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) DELHI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Mr. Gaurav Kochar with Mr. Dollar Jain, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Shailendra Kumar Singh, PS Gokulpuri. : JUDGMENT3008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 323/2017 & Crl.M.A.7299/2017 (stay) 1. The petitioners impugn order dated 28.01.2017, whereby, charge, inter alia, under Section 307 Indian Penal Code (IPC for short) has been framed against the petitioners.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant had suspected that his wife was having an affair with one of the co- accused and, as such, there was enmity between them. It is further CRL.REV.P. 323/2017 Page 1 of 6 contended that at 9 am in the morning, when he was walking by hi...
Raj Luxmi vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
#66 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 9168/2018 RAJ LUXMI versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Jeetendra Gupta, Advocate. :Mr.RipuDaman,CGSCwithMr.T.P.Singh,AdvocateforR-1andMr.T.SinghdevandMr.AbhijitChakravarty,AdvocatesforR-Mr.AmitBansalandMs.SeemaDolo,AdvocatesforR-Mr.MohinderJ.S.Rupal,AdvocateforR-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions to the respondents to grant admission to petitioner in MBBS Course for the Session 2018-19 in Respondent No.6 medical college or such medical college in terms of petitioners rank in National W.P.(C) 9168/2018 Page 1 of 3 Eligibility Cum Entrance Test (NEET) 2018 u...
Harsh Vardhan Pratap Singh vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. 04.2018 Judgment pronounced on:30. 08.2018 + W.P.(C) 6692/2017 HARSH VARDHAN PRATAP SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Gupta with Ms. Mansi Kukreja, Mr. Raj Vardhan Pratap Singh and Mr. Anshul Saroha, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Harman, Advocate for UOI. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.Background 1. The petitioner before me is the Managing Director and Accountable Manager of a Flying Training Organization (in short 'FTO') going by the name: Falcon Aviation Academy. This writ petition has been filed to challenge the validity of para 13.5 (i) of Section 7, Series D, Part 1 [hereafter referred to as 'Impugned Provision]., which is incorporated in Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR), issued by the Director General of Civil Aviation ('DGCA'). 1.1 The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the impugned provision e...
Ashish Kumar Aggarwal vs.vakil Ahmed & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 4226/2016 ASHISH KUMAR AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate versus VAKIL AHMED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Arora and Ms. Radhika Arora, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had filed a petition (CC no.1334/1/07) on 03.03.2005 styled as an application under Section 156(3) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) in the court of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate with the prayer that cognizance be taken on his complaint, directions be given for the same to be investigated into, allegations primarily being that on 18.02.2005 while going towards Janpath via Barakhamba Road on the public street, he was stopped by the first respondent, a public servant (police officer) who was arrayed in the said petition as accused and inquiries were made about his driving licence and about a packet which o...
Krishan Kant vs.state of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4399/2018 Judgment delivered on:30. 08.2018 KRISHAN KANT STATE OF DELHI & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Pushpender Shukla, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms.Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Gyan Singh, P.S.Pul Prahladpur. JUDGMENT3008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.388 of 2011 under Sections 498A/406 of the IPC registered at Police Station Pul Prahladpur, Delhi based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement vide Compromise Deed dated 09.04.2018. CRL.M.C. 4399/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 9,00,000/- has been agreed to be paid to respondent No.2. A sum of Rs. 3,50,000/- has alrea...
Future Generali India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.monika Sheikh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 30, 2018 + MAC.APP. 1103/2017 FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Maihan, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MANIK SHEIKH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate + MAC.APP. 5/2018 FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Maihan, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MONIKA SHEIKH & ANR. . ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate + MAC.APP. 6/2018 FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Maihan, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MANIK SHEIKH & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT (ORAL) Page 1 of 5 MAC.APP. 1103/2017 MAC.APP. 5/2018 MAC.APP. 6/2018 1. The above captioned first appeal arise out of impugned Award of 7th September, 2017 vide which Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded compensation of `12,04,...
Nemwati vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:24. h August 2018 Decided on:30. h August 2018 RAKESH CRL.A. 672/2015 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate versus THE STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State + CRL.A. 283/2018 NEMWATI Through: Mr. Ansar Ahmed, Advocate ..... Appellant versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 These are two connected appeals, one by Rakesh (hereafter referred to as the accused) and the other by Nemwati (hereafter the victim). The accused challenges the judgment dated 16th May 2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, North West (hereafter the trial Court) in Crl.A.672/2015 & Crl. A.283/2018 Page 1 of 19 Sessions Case No.50/2014 arising out of FIR No.151/2014 registered at Police Station (PS) Sultan Puri convicting him for the offences under Secti...
Millennium Deluxe Motors p.ltd. Vs.arun Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h August, 2018. RFA182008 MILLENNIUM DELUXE MOTORS P.LTD. Through: Mr. D.J.Khera, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus ARUN JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Saurabh Dev Karan and Mr. Uchit Bhandari, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 9th August, 2017 in Suit No.217/2006 of the Court of Additional District Judge, Delhi]. of dismissal as barred by time of the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.4,12,250/- from the respondent/defendant.2. The appeal came up first before this Court on 18th January, 2008 and vide order dated 19th November, 2008 notice thereof ordered to be issued. The respondent/defendant however was not served for several dates and finally appeared before this Court on 28th January, 2010. Vide order dated 17th March, 2010, the appeal was admitted for he...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »