Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Rishi Jain & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4412/2018 SHRI RISHI JAIN & ORS. versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Nagender Yadav, Advocate with petitioners in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Sita Ram, PS Rani Bagh. Mr. Kanwar Kochhar, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. JUDGMENT3108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.31077/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4412/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.706/2015 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Rani Bagh, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 4412/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law of the respondent No.2....
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -6 vs.m/s Nokia India Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.955/2018 Date of decision:31. t August, 2018. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. Versus M/S NOKIA INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Srivastava, Mr. Sumit Mangal and Ms. Rashi Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Present appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act', for short) in the case of Nokia India Pvt. Ltd ('respondent-assessee' for short) assails the order dated 30th January, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('Tribunal' for short). The appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2003- 04.2. First issue relates to provision for warranty of Rs. 5.48 crores. The Assessing Officer vide assessment order dated 27.02.2006 had disallowed claim for provision for warranty as unascertained liability, ITA9552018 P...
Ramprastha Promoters & Developers Pvt Ltd vs.army Welfare Housing Orga ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~28 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:31. t August, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 197/2018 & CM No.35405/2018 (stay) RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD Through: Mr.S.Ganesh, ..... Appellant with Mr.Narendera M. Sharma, Mr.Abhishek Sharma, Ms.Prachi Gupta, Ms.Pavitra Singh, Advocates. Advocate Sr. versus ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION (AWHO) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.A.K. Tewari and Mr.Vikramaditya Singh, Advocates for respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Caveat petition No.786/2018 Mr.Tewari, counsel for the respondents enters appearance. Accordingly, caveat petition stands disposed of. CM.APPL.35406/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 197/2018 & CM No.35405/2018 (stay) 1. This is an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Rule 13 of the Delhi...
Smt. Poonam Rawat & Ors. Vs.yogendra Saraswat & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 18/2018 & IA110972018 O.M.P. 19/2018 & IA110992018 Reserved on:21. t August, 2018 Date of decision:31st August, 2018 SMT. POONAM RAWAT & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.V.P.Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Apurva Upmanyu, Mr.Ekansh Bansal, Advs. versus YOGENDRA SARASWAT & ORS. RAKESH KUMAR PACHORI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Avi Singh, Mr.Shashank Dixit,Mr.Katyayini & Ms.Purnima Malik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 These petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Awards dated 31.05.2018 and 30.05.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration case No.01/2017 (Mr.Yogendra Saraswat & Anr. v. Kendriya Bhandar & Ors.) and Arbitration case No.02/2017 (Mr.Rakesh Kumar Pachori v. Union of India & Ors.) respectively. As identical issues arise for consi...
Sunder Lal Raj Kumar vs.balram Kansal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~54 & 55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t August, 2018 SUNDER LAL RAJ KUMAR % + WP(C) 6748/2013 & CM APPL. 14646/2013 MURARI LAL GUPTA versus Through: Mr. K. Sunil, Adv. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Mr. D.K.Pandey and Mr. Sunil Dwivedi, Advs. SUNDER LAL RAJ KUMAR + WP(C) 6749/2013 & CM APPL. 14648/2013 BALRAM KANSAL versus Through: Mr. K. Sunil, Adv. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Mr. D.K.Pandey and Mr. Sunil Dwivedi, Advs.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The issues of fact and law, arising in these two writ petitions, are cognate and, to an extent, common, involving consideration of the same legal issues and leading to the same conclusion. They are, therefore, being decided by this common judgement. In order to facilitate an easier appreciation of the controversy, however, I would be deciding the issues arising for controversy in the context of WP (C) 6748/2013 (M/s Sunder Lal Raj Kumar v. Mur...
Director Ihbas and Another vs.a K Roy and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~61 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:31. t August, 2018 LPA4522017 DIRECTOR IHBAS & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr S.D. Singh, Mr Rahul Kumar and Singh, Mr Kamla Prasad Mr.Jitender Singh, Advs A K ROY & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Raj Kumar Sharma and Mr.Narendra Singh, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM No.23784/2017 (delay) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of 126 days delay in filing the appeal.2. Subject to payment of cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be deposited in the Kerala Chief Ministers Distress Relief Fund, the delay is condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. LPA4522017 and CM No.23940/2017 (stay) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 20.12.2016 passed by a Single Judge of this Court. The respondent herein had filed a writ petition. Challenge was laid to a Show Cause Notice issued on 22.09.2016 containing articles of cha...
Ajaib Singh Dateer vs.lt. Governor & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2759/2000 AND CM APPL. 19808/2017 Judgment Reserved on:12. 04.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:30. 08.2018 AJAIB SINGH DATEER ........ Petitioner Through Dr. M.P. Raju with Ms. C. Kanta Dateer and Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advs. versus LT. GOVERNOR & ORS .....Respondents Through Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Adv. for DHC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The petitioner in these proceedings is now a retired judicial officer of the Delhi Judicial Service (hereafter DJS); he is aggrieved by the annual confidential report (ACR) gradings recorded by the Full Court of the Delhi High Court for three years and the consequent denial of selection grade to him. He accordingly seeks appropriate directions for the quashing of such ACR gradings and consequential directions to grant him promotion to the higher judicial service with effect from the date his juniors in DJS were granted such benefits. Dur...
Sudesh Bala vs.govt of Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: August 30, 2018 SUDESH BALA + W.P.(C) 8684/2018 Through: Mr. Deepak Khosla, Advocate GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 16th October, 2017 (Annexure P-1) rejects 1. petitioners application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land on the ground that the following requisite documents have not been furnished:-"(i). Affidavit (ii). Complete revenue record (iii). Ownership status (iv). R.D.(Relinquishment Deed) 2. Counsel for petitioner submits that on the last date of hearing, copy of Minutes of Meeting of the Recommendation Committee held on 17th September, 2014 was handed over to respondents counsel to clarify as to how the impugned order can be justified, as the Recommendation Committee had recommended the case of petitioner for allotment...
M/S Shivali Construction Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Earth Infrastructure Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 08.2018 CS(OS) 261/2017 $~OS-23 * % + M/S SHIVALI CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD Through Mr.Rohan Sharma, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus M/S EARTH INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Through Ex parte ..... Defendant JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This suit is filed seeking a decree of Rs.3,25,25,657/- along with interest on account of unpaid lease rentals.2. It is contended by the plaintiff that the defendant took on lease the property No.26, Plot No.34, 1st Floor, Nailwal Estate, Western Extension Area, Pusa Road, New Delhi by lease deed dated 05.08.2011 for a period of three years commencing 11.07.2011. It is stated that as per the lease deed, the agreed rental was Rs.12,17,562/- per month. The lease expired in July 2014. The parties renewed the lease for a further period of three years and the rent was enhanced by 15% in terms of the lease deed dated 05.08.2011. The rent now became Rs.14,00,197/-. It is pleaded that...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s Delhi Driver Placement Services Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h August, 2018 + O.M.P. 525/2008 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jyotindra Kumar & Mr. A.K. Verma, Advocates (M-8587815809). versus M/S DELHI DRIVER PLACEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD. EB+ ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Malaya Chand, Advocate (M- CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH981050525). Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 4575/2017 (Delay in filing Restoration Application) 1. This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 101 days in filing of I.A. 4574/2017 for restoration of the petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned.2. I.A. is allowed. I.A. 4574/2017 (Restoration Application) 3. This is an application seeking restoration of OMP5262008 which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 2nd December, 2016. For the reasons stated in the application, OMP5262008 is restored.4. I.A. is allowed. O.M.P. 525/2008 5. The present petition has been filed under Se...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »