Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay Kumar & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4378/2014 Judgment delivered on:31. 08.2018 SANJAY KUMAR & ORS. versus GOVT. OF NCT & ANR. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Gopal Sharma and Ms. Tanya Bhatia, Advocates with petitioners in person. Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, APP for the State with SI Sanjeev Kumar Mr. R.P.S. Bhatti, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. JUDGMENT3108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.524/2004 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar, Delhi. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes before Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi and Settlement dated 24.08.2013 has been entered between the parties. The parties have already been divorced by way o...
Arvinder Walia (Owner) vs.icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 31, 2018 + MAC.APP. 422/2016 & C.M. 18889/2016 ARVINDER WALIA (OWNER) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.C.Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, Ms. Asha Rani & Mr. Y.Mittal, Advocates Versus ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 448/2016 & C.M. 20326/2016 Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate ARVINDER WALIA (OWNER) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.C.Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, Ms. Asha Rani & Mr. Y.Mittal, Advocates Versus ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate + MAC.APP. 449/2016 & C.M. 20444/2016 ARVINDER WALIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.C.Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, Ms. Asha Rani & Mr. Y.Mittal, Advocates Page 1 of 5 Versus MAC.APP. 422/2016 MAC.APP. 448/2016 MAC.APP. 449/2016 1. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Ad...
Prism Motion Pictures Private Limited vs.mukta Arts Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t August, 2018. PRISM MOTION PICTURES PRIVATE LIMITED CS (COMM) 1322/2016 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mohd. Fuzail Khan and Ms. Shafali versus Jain, Advocates. (M:9818331923) MUKTA ARTS LIMITED & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rahul Chitnis and Mr. Angad Singh Narula, Advocate for D-1. (M:9899884710) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The Plaintiff in the present case has `doubled its troubles by registering the title DOUBLE TROUBLE for a Punjabi film. It has neither been able to produce and release its movie and on the other hand, Defendant no.1 adopted the title DOUBLE DI TROUBLE and released its Punjabi film in the said name.2. The present suit for passing off and infringement of copyright has been filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendant No.1- Mukta Arts Limited. The grievance of the Plaintiff is that the Plaintiff coined the film title DOUBLE TROUBLE (Punjabi) and registered the ...
Uma Gupta & Ors. Vs.the State and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~ O-17 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t August, 2018 TEST.CAS. 100/2010 UMA GUPTA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.J.C. Mahindro, Mr.J.K. Garg and Mr.Shubham Agarwal, Advocates versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Raghvendra Pandey and Mr.Lokesh Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioners are seeking letters of administration with respect to the estate of late Hari Kishan Gupta who died intestate on 19th February, 2007 at Sant Parmanand Hospital, Civil Lines, Delhi.2. The deceased Hari Kishan Gupta was survived by his widow, Uma Gupta and three daughters namely Alka Garg, Nidhi Gupta and Anjali Gupta.3. This petition has been filed jointly by Uma Gupta, Alka Garg and Nidhi Gupta. The third daughter, Anjali Gupta did not join in the petition and was impleaded as respondent No.2 in the petition. Anjali Gupta expired on 10th September, 2011 whereupon the petitioners filed I.A...
Pushpa vs.kanta Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PUSHPA Date of decision:31. t August, 2018. RSA1242018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Narendra Sharma and Mr. Devender Kumar, Advs. KANTA DEVI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: None. Versus ..... Respondent CM No.35585/2018 (for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. RSA1242018 & CM No.35584/2018 (for stay) 3. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 4th July, 2018 in RCA No.140/2017 of the Court of District Judge, Shahdara]. of dismissal of the First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant/defendant against the judgment and decree [dated 27th May, 2017 in Suit No.9934/2016 of the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Shahdara]. allowing the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for mandatory injunction directing the appellant/defendant to vacate the second floor of House No...
Man Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:31. t August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11195/2017 MAN SINGH .......Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with for Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, Ms. L&B/LAC. Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to (00-07) 1/216th share of the land comprised in Khasra No.89/3/1(07-16) and 89/3/2(64-05) admeasuring 72 Bighas 01 Biswa situated in the revenue estate of village Ghonda Gujran Khadar Shahdra, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, R...
Santosh Kumar vs.reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August 31, 2018 + MAC.APP. 198/2017 & CM85272017 + MAC.APP. 199/2017 & CM86992017 + MAC.APP. 202/2017 & CM86462017 + MAC.APP. 203/2017 & CM86962017 + MAC.APP. 204/2017 & CM87002017 SEEMA SHARMA SEEMA SHARMA & ANR SEEMA SHARMA & ANR. SATINDER KUMAR SANTOSH KUMAR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate 1. Versus RELIANCE GEN INS CO LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinavasan, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned five appeals arise out of common impugned Award of 29th September, 2016. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these five appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.2. In this unfortunate accident, Priyanka, aged 16 years and Happy, aged 10 years have died and their parents-Satinder and Seema as well as MAC.A...
Amar Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:31. t August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11189/2017 AMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with for Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, Ms. L&B/LAC. Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to (03-00) 1/24th share of the land comprised in Khasra No.89/3/1(07-16) and 89/3/2(64-05) admeasuring 72 Bighas 01 Biswa situated in the revenue estate of village Ghonda Gujran Khadar Shahdra, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabil...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd vs.rakesh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t August, 2018 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Through: Mr.Brijesh Bagga, Advocate versus ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Manu Shahalia, Advocate for R-1 $~ 1 & 2 * % + MAC.APP. 346/2017 1 RAKESH & ORS + MAC.APP. 327/2018 2 RAKESH Through: Mr.Manu Shahalia, Advocate versus ..... Appellant IFFCO TOKIO GEN INS CO LTD AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Brijesh Bagga, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.16,08,100/- has been awarded to the claimant.2. The accident dated 14th July, 2015 resulted in amputation of right lower limb of Rakesh (hereinafter referred as claimant). He remained hospitalized from 14th July, 2015 to 23rd July, 2015 and 30th July, 2015 to 08th August, 2015. The amputation resulted in 70% of permanent disability MAC.APP. 346/2017 & MAC.APP. 327/2018 Page ...
Karan Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:31. t August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11185/2017 KARAM SINGH ........Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with for Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, Ms. L&B/LAC. Mr. Namit Suri, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to (03-00) 1/24th share of the land comprised in Khasra No.89/3/1(07-16) and 89/3/2(64-05) admeasuring 72 Bighas 01 Biswa situated in the revenue estate of village Ghonda Gujran Khadar Shahdra, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »