Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Poonam Rawat & Ors. Vs.rakesh Kumar Pachori & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 18/2018 & IA110972018 O.M.P. 19/2018 & IA110992018 Reserved on:21. t August, 2018 Date of decision:31st August, 2018 SMT. POONAM RAWAT & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.V.P.Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Apurva Upmanyu, Mr.Ekansh Bansal, Advs. versus YOGENDRA SARASWAT & ORS. RAKESH KUMAR PACHORI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Avi Singh, Mr.Shashank Dixit,Mr.Katyayini & Ms.Purnima Malik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 These petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Awards dated 31.05.2018 and 30.05.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration case No.01/2017 (Mr.Yogendra Saraswat & Anr. v. Kendriya Bhandar & Ors.) and Arbitration case No.02/2017 (Mr.Rakesh Kumar Pachori v. Union of India & Ors.) respectively. As identical issues arise for consi...
Devender Yadav vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 9227/2018 Date of Decision:31. 08.2018 ........ Petitioner DEVENDER YADAV Through: Mr. Manohar Malik, Adv. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for North DMC/R-1 with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Adv. Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC (Civil) for R-2 & 3. Mrs. Suparna Srivastava with Ms. Nehul Sharma, Advs. for R-5 to 7. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO RAJENDRA MENON, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL): CM APPL. 35607/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 9227/2018 & CM APPL. 35606/2018 (stay) 1. This Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed and the prayer made in the petition is to issue a mandamus to respondent No.1, namely, the North Delhi Municipal Corporation to shut down Bhalswa Landfill Site which is used for dumping W.P.(C) 9227/2018 ...
Gautam Modi vs.pravin Chandra Modi (Deceased) Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t August, 2018 GAUTAM MODI EX.F.A. 36/2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Sagar Sahay and Mr. Siddharth Bangar, Advs. Versus PRAVIN CHANDRA MODI (DECEASED) THR LRS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.35491/2018 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. EX.F.A. 36/2018 & CM No.35490/2018 (for stay) 3. This Execution First Appeal impugns the order [dated 9th August, 2018 in Execution No.41/2016 (New Number 54326/2016) of the Court of Senior Civil Judge-North]. of dismissal of the objections filed by the appellant / defendant / judgment-debtor to the execution sought by the deceased respondent / plaintiff / decree-holder of judgment and decree [dated 12th February, 2015 in RCA No.6/2014 of the Court of Additional District Judge-04, North-West]. allowing the appeal of the deceased respondent / plaintiff / decree-holde...
Man Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:31. t August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11195/2017 MAN SINGH .......Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with for Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, Ms. L&B/LAC. Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to (00-07) 1/216th share of the land comprised in Khasra No.89/3/1(07-16) and 89/3/2(64-05) admeasuring 72 Bighas 01 Biswa situated in the revenue estate of village Ghonda Gujran Khadar Shahdra, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, R...
Satinder Kumar vs.reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August 31, 2018 + MAC.APP. 198/2017 & CM85272017 + MAC.APP. 199/2017 & CM86992017 + MAC.APP. 202/2017 & CM86462017 + MAC.APP. 203/2017 & CM86962017 + MAC.APP. 204/2017 & CM87002017 SEEMA SHARMA SEEMA SHARMA & ANR SEEMA SHARMA & ANR. SATINDER KUMAR SANTOSH KUMAR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate 1. Versus RELIANCE GEN INS CO LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinavasan, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned five appeals arise out of common impugned Award of 29th September, 2016. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these five appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.2. In this unfortunate accident, Priyanka, aged 16 years and Happy, aged 10 years have died and their parents-Satinder and Seema as well as MAC.A...
Delhi Development Authority vs.subhash Bhardwaj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:-31st August, 2018. RSA262017 & CM Nos. 2663/2017 (stay) & 2664/2017(for condonation of delay of 18 days in filing) versus ..... Appellant Through: Gupta, Advs. Mr. Sanjeev Sagar and Ms. Sunita DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of the Through: Mr. N. S. Dalal and Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Advs. SUBHASH BHARDWAJ .... Respondent Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order [dated 1st August, 2016 in RCA No.377/2016 of the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge, West]. of dismissal as barred by time of the first appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant/ defendant/ DDA against the judgment and decree [dated 5th August, 2011 in Suit No.296/2008 of the Court of Civil Judge, West]. allowing the suit filed by the respondent/ plaintiff and restraining the appellant/ defendant/ DDA by a decree of permanent injunction...
M/S High Groung Enterprises Ltd. Vs.rama Krishna Electro Components Pv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL (OS) (COMM) No.19/2018 Date of decision:31. t August, 2018 M/S HIGH GROUNG ENTERPRISES Ltd. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Advocate. versus RAMA KRISHNA ELECTRO COMPONENTS PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The present Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Section 104 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Code, for short) and Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 impugns order dated 23rd July, 2018 passed in IA No.21843/2014 in CS(COMM) No.599/2017.2. The aforesaid order dismisses the application for leave to defend filed by the appellant, M/s High Ground Enterprises Limited ('appellant-defendant', for short), under Order XXXVII, Rule 3 of the Code. RFA(OS)(COMM) 19/2018 Page 1 of 7...
Ritu Bharga vs.sharad Bhargava
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Pronounced On:31. t August, 2018 + MAT.APP.(F.C) 221/2018 RITU BHARGA Through: versus ...Appellant Ms. Priyanka Garg, Advocate. SHARAD BHARGAVA Through:... RESPONDENTNone. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.CM No.35332/2018 (Delay) The present application has been filed by the appellant for condonation of delay in filing the present appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 78 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. C.M. 35330/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C) 221/2018 & C.M. 35331/2018(stay) 1. In the present appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the appellant/wife is aggrieved by an order dated MAT.APP. (F.C.) 221/2018 Page 1 of 10 19.03.2018 (hereinafter the 'Impugned Order') passed by the...
Seema Sharma & Anr vs.reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August 31, 2018 + MAC.APP. 198/2017 & CM85272017 + MAC.APP. 199/2017 & CM86992017 + MAC.APP. 202/2017 & CM86462017 + MAC.APP. 203/2017 & CM86962017 + MAC.APP. 204/2017 & CM87002017 SEEMA SHARMA SEEMA SHARMA & ANR SEEMA SHARMA & ANR. SATINDER KUMAR SANTOSH KUMAR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate 1. Versus RELIANCE GEN INS CO LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinavasan, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned five appeals arise out of common impugned Award of 29th September, 2016. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these five appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.2. In this unfortunate accident, Priyanka, aged 16 years and Happy, aged 10 years have died and their parents-Satinder and Seema as well as MAC.A...
M/S d.b Corporation Ltd vs.m/s Chd Developers Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2018
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:31. 08.2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 259/2016 M/S D.B CORPORATION LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Mody and Mr.Tarpit Patni, Advs. versus M/S CHD DEVELOPERS LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath, Mr.Pratham Sharma and Mr.Rohan Ganpathy, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking to set aside the impugned award dated 28.10.2014 passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as A.T.). Some of the relevant facts are that the petitioner Company is engaged in the business of publishing newpapers, periodical and other printing publications under the name of Dainik Bhaskar and Divya Bhaskar, etc. The respondent is a public limited company engaged in the business of real estate and is developing housing and commercial complexes.2. On 12th February, 2008, t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »