Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s Four S. Security & Allied
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30th August, 2018. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION O.M.P. 499/2008 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jyotindra Kumar & Mr. A.K. Verma, Advocates (M-8587815809). M/S FOUR S. SECURITY & ALLIED SERVICES LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M. Taiyab Khan, Advocate (M- 9312222450). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the award of the Learned Sole Arbitrator dated 6th June, 2008, except to the extent of award passed qua Issue No.2 therein.2. The brief background is that the Respondent is an out sourcing agency through whom drivers were employed by DTC vide contract dated 31st May, 2005. The agreement was valid for a period of one year from 1st June, 2005. Services of drivers were being availed of by DTC and payment was made on the basis of per kilometre rate. The payments for the months of Feb...
Unity-Triveni-Bcpl (Jv) vs.rail Vikas Nigam Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:30. 08.2018 + W.P.(C) 3883/2017 UNITY-TRIVENI-BCPL (JV) versus RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner Respondent :Ms Kiran Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr Hitendra Nath Rathi, Advocate. :Mr Udit Seth, Advocate. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to respondent to implement the Office Memorandum dated 05.09.2016 issued by NITI Aayog (hereafter the OM) for ensuring that the arbitration between the parties is conducted in terms of the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the A&C Act), as amended by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (hereafter the Amendment Act).2. There are certain disputes between the parties and the petitioner had in...
National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India vs.p.o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement pronounced on:30th August, 2018 + LPA792016 NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA ....Appellant Through Mr Arun Dhiman, Advocate versus P.O. LABOUR COURT & ANR ...Respondents Through Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC,Civil with Ms. Sukriti Ghai, Adv. for R-1, Mr. Kittu Bajaj, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J1 Challenge in this appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent Act is to the order dated 28.07.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the application filed under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the respondent No.2/Ramesh Kumar seeking direction to the appellant/Federation to pay wages as per the minimum wages applicable under the statute was allowed. LPA792016 Page 1 of 17 2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present appeal are that one Ramesh K...
Priti Pratap Singh vs.rani Prem Kumari (Deceased) Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.555/2018 % PRITI PRATAP SINGH30h August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Salman Khurshid and Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Vikramadivya Singh, Ms. Shruti Dutt and Ms. Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advocates (Mobile No.9811700872). versus RANI PREM KUMARI (DECEASED) THR LRS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vivek Raj Singh and Ms. Ananttika Singh, Advocates for R-1(a) and 2 (Mobile No.9839019224). Mr. R.K. Agrawal, Advocate with Mr. Rathore, Advocate (Mobile 9829483671). Sr. S.S. for R-5 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.555/2018 Page 1 of 37 RFA No.555/2018 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 28238-43/2018 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 12.3.2018 by which the tria...
Vedanta Limited vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
#55 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 12220/2016 VEDANTA LIMITED versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Manish Garg, Advocate For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr. Rajat Gava, Advocate for Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The writ petition has been received on transfer.2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, the same is taken up for final hearing and disposed of with the following order.3. It is the case of the petitioner that, owing to global downturn and recession, exports from India were substantially hit in the financial year 2012-13. W.P.(C)12220/2016 Page 1 of 4 4. In order to incentivize and achieve incremental exports, the Central introduced a scheme called the Incremental Exports Government referred to as the subject Incentiviza...
Suresh @ Kala vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~R-11 * + % CRL.A. 62/2015 SURESH @ KALA IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. 08.2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Parameshwar and Mr. M.V.Mukunda, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. Mr. Anil Dabas, Advocate seeks discharge. Since Mr. K. Paramashewar, Advocate appears on behalf of the appellant as appointed a legal aid, the power of attorney of Mr. Anil Dabas is discharged.2. We have heard learned counsels and proceed to judgment.3. The appellant has preferred the present appeal to assail his conviction under Section 3IPC by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special CRL.A. 62/2015 Page 1 of 21 Judge (NDPS), North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.68/2012 arising out of FIR No.162/2012, registered at Police Station- AmanVihar, under Sections 3IPC. The appellant, upon hi...
Rakesh vs.the State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:24. h August 2018 Decided on:30. h August 2018 RAKESH CRL.A. 672/2015 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate versus THE STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State + CRL.A. 283/2018 NEMWATI Through: Mr. Ansar Ahmed, Advocate ..... Appellant versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 These are two connected appeals, one by Rakesh (hereafter referred to as the accused) and the other by Nemwati (hereafter the victim). The accused challenges the judgment dated 16th May 2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, North West (hereafter the trial Court) in Crl.A.672/2015 & Crl. A.283/2018 Page 1 of 19 Sessions Case No.50/2014 arising out of FIR No.151/2014 registered at Police Station (PS) Sultan Puri convicting him for the offences under Secti...
Anil Kumar Nasa & Ors vs.delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7460/2016 1. ANIL KUMAR NASA & ORS Through : Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, St. Counsel with Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioners, who, after being appointed as Junior Engineer, at the time of their initial appointment, in the Slum and J.J.Department of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, (which was later rechristened as the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board - DUSIB) were stagnating for years together, were granted their first financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression Scheme (the ACP Scheme), notified by the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), w.e.f. 9th August, 1999.2. As per the said scheme, on completion of 24 years of regular service, the petitioners would have become entitled to second ...
Future Generali India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.manik Sheikh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 30, 2018 + MAC.APP. 1103/2017 FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Maihan, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MANIK SHEIKH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate + MAC.APP. 5/2018 FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Maihan, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MONIKA SHEIKH & ANR. . ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate + MAC.APP. 6/2018 FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Maihan, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MANIK SHEIKH & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT (ORAL) Page 1 of 5 MAC.APP. 1103/2017 MAC.APP. 5/2018 MAC.APP. 6/2018 1. The above captioned first appeal arise out of impugned Award of 7th September, 2017 vide which Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded compensation of `12,04,...
Fateh Chand Sharma & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4403/2018 FATEH CHAND SHARMA & ORS versus ........ Petitioners STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr.Ajay Gulati, Adv. Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghai, APP with ASI Surinder Dutt, P.S.Hari Nagar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.31030/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4403/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.29/2013 under Sections 498A IPC, Police Station Adarsh Nagar.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the grandfather of petitioner No.4, the husband and CRL.M.C. 4403/2018 Page 1 of 3 is stated unwell and presently at Sonepat. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that call was received in the morning and petitioner No.4 had to rush to Sonepat to take care of h...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »