Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.raj Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d January, 2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 RFA5582017& CM APPL. 21042/2017 (Stay) + NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. .. Appellants Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate (M- 9873316904) versus RAJ RANI CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate (M- 9650560021) Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors ...
M/S Sanghi Medical Centre P. Ltd vs.dr. Manik Ranjan Dutta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"22nd March, 2018 CM(M) 598/2015 & CM No.17560/2017 M/S SANGHI MEDICAL CENTRE P. LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate. versus DR. MANIK RANJAN DUTTA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Kher, Senior Advocate along with Mr. D.R. Bhatia, Mr. Sandeep thukral & Ms. Subiya Akbar Warsi, Advocates for LR No.2 of R-1. Mr. M.A. Niyazi with Mr. Kirti Jaswal, Advocates for LR No.3 of R-1. Ms. Arti Bansal with Mr. Ashutosh Nandan Atrey, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The suit for declaration and injunction permanent and mandatory of the petitioner was instituted on the original side of this Court in 1996, the prime issue raised being as to whether the petitioner as the plaintiff had the right to use and raise construction on the terrace floor over and above the second floor of property bearing No.M-30, Greater Kailash-1, New Delhi on the ground floor of which it claims...
Sanjeev Vinay Chetule vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 22, 20181) + W.P.(C) 3073/20172) + W.P.(C) 3074/20173) + W.P.(C) 3075/20174) + W.P.(C) 3076/20175) + W.P.(C) 3077/20176) + W.P.(C) 3078/20177) + W.P.(C) 3079/2017 & C.M. 14964/20178) + W.P.(C) 3080/20179) + W.P.(C) 3081/201710) + W.P.(C) 3082/201711) + W.P.(C) 3083/201712) + W.P.(C) 3084/2017 KETAN JOGINDHER G. SANJEEV VINAY CHETULE GIRI SANKAR S. CHITHARANJAN MADDIKUNTA SIDDHARTHA SHASHANK RATNOO NARENDRA KUMAR SHAH SHREERANJANI K SAGAR CHOURASIA & ANR RAHUL KUMAR GAGAN B G ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr.Vikram Hegde, Mr. Prateek Chadha & Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advocates W.P.(C) 3073/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 1. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Devik Singh, Advocates for respondent-UPSC Mr. R. Sathish and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent-NCBC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL G...
Rahul Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 22, 20181) + W.P.(C) 3073/20172) + W.P.(C) 3074/20173) + W.P.(C) 3075/20174) + W.P.(C) 3076/20175) + W.P.(C) 3077/20176) + W.P.(C) 3078/20177) + W.P.(C) 3079/2017 & C.M. 14964/20178) + W.P.(C) 3080/20179) + W.P.(C) 3081/201710) + W.P.(C) 3082/201711) + W.P.(C) 3083/201712) + W.P.(C) 3084/2017 KETAN JOGINDHER G. SANJEEV VINAY CHETULE GIRI SANKAR S. CHITHARANJAN MADDIKUNTA SIDDHARTHA SHASHANK RATNOO NARENDRA KUMAR SHAH SHREERANJANI K SAGAR CHOURASIA & ANR RAHUL KUMAR GAGAN B G ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr.Vikram Hegde, Mr. Prateek Chadha & Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advocates W.P.(C) 3073/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 1. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Devik Singh, Advocates for respondent-UPSC Mr. R. Sathish and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent-NCBC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL G...
Northern Seed Association vs.union of India & Ors & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~38 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.2821/2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 NORTHERN SEED ASSOCIATION ....... Petitioner Through Mr. Neeraj Grover, Advocate with Mr. Aditya Singh, Ms. Mehk and Ms. Kanika, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC and Mr. Nitish Gupta, Mr. Viplav Acharya, Mr. Harshul Choudhary, Mr. Sahil sood Advocates for UOI. Mr. Amit Bansal and Mr. Akhil, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate for Customs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This writ petition has been filed by an association called Northern Seed Association. It is stated that the petitioner association is registered under the Societies Registration Act and importers of vegetable seeds are its members.2. The petitioners have primarily impugned General Alert Circular No.11/2013 dated 30th September, 201...
Meenakshi Jain vs.delhi Medical Council & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA4042016 & CM APPL. 25246/2016 Reserved on:15. 02.2018 Pronounced on:22. 03.2018 MEENAKSHI JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Meenakshi Jain, in person. versus DELHI MEDICAL COUNCIL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Praveen Khattar and Mr. Bapi Das, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Madhukar Pandey, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.Facts 1. The appellant questions the dismissal of her writ petition, by the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court (dated 25.04.2016).2. The facts are that the appellants father late Sh. P.K. Jain (the patient hereafter) was admitted to Indraprastha Apollo Hospital on 06.03.2009 at 1:00 p.m. for a non-cardiac surgery of incision and drainage of perianal abscess. He however passed away on 01.04.2009. On 09.04.2009 the appellant requested the hospital to provide her the patients complete medical records. The hospital provided the comp...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.gagan Chadha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA562017 & CM APPL.1751/2017 (Stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. .. Appellants Through: Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel for Nr.DMC with Ms. Supreet Bimbra, Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocates Mr. S.C. Meena, EE (Project Narela) versus GAGAN CHADHA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Prerna Sinha and Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgments are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work ord...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs.munish Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :24. h January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA4432017 & CM APPL.16182 & 16183/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Appellants MUNISH ANAND Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Adv.(M:9873316904) versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate (M- 9650560021). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contract...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.munish Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22. d March, 2018 RFA4292017 & CM No.15923/2017 (ex-parte stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. .... Appellants Through : Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate. versus Through : Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. ..... Respondent MUNISH ANAND CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafte...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.sanjeev Oberoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d January, 2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 + RFA4452017 & CM APPLs.16194/2017, 16195/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Adv.(M:9873316904) versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellants Through: None. SANJEEV OBEROI CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the Enginee...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »