Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.munish Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d January, 2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 RFA4442017 & CM APPL. 16186-16187/2017 + NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .. Appellants & ANR. Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate. Versus MUNISH ANAND ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the Engine...
East Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.pawan Kumar Suri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d February, 2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 RFA10092017 & CM APPL. 47233/2017 (Stay) EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Ms.Anushruti, with Counsel Advocate. (9810674872) Through: Ms. Monisha, Advocate. ..... Respondent versus PAWAN KUMAR SURI CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were exec...
S K Gupta vs.national Insurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 22, 2018 W.P.(C) 3768/2016 S K GUPTA Through: In person ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajender Dhawan, Mr.B.S.Rana and Ms.Shafali Dhawan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner was promoted as Assistant in respondent-National Insurance Company Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Company) on 7th August, 1987 and since then, he is working as Assistant.... Petitioner, who appears in person, chooses to argue himself and submits that in the year 2008, he had sought stagnation increments which was due to him in December, 2007, and also in December, 2009; December, 2011; December, 2013 and December, 2015. An inquiry is also sought by petitioner for the delay occasioned in grant of stagnation increments.2. In response to this petition, respondent-Company has relied upon General Insurance (Rationalization of Pay Scales and Other Condition...
Narendra Kumar Shah vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 22, 20181) + W.P.(C) 3073/20172) + W.P.(C) 3074/20173) + W.P.(C) 3075/20174) + W.P.(C) 3076/20175) + W.P.(C) 3077/20176) + W.P.(C) 3078/20177) + W.P.(C) 3079/2017 & C.M. 14964/20178) + W.P.(C) 3080/20179) + W.P.(C) 3081/201710) + W.P.(C) 3082/201711) + W.P.(C) 3083/201712) + W.P.(C) 3084/2017 KETAN JOGINDHER G. SANJEEV VINAY CHETULE GIRI SANKAR S. CHITHARANJAN MADDIKUNTA SIDDHARTHA SHASHANK RATNOO NARENDRA KUMAR SHAH SHREERANJANI K SAGAR CHOURASIA & ANR RAHUL KUMAR GAGAN B G ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr.Vikram Hegde, Mr. Prateek Chadha & Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advocates W.P.(C) 3073/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 1. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Devik Singh, Advocates for respondent-UPSC Mr. R. Sathish and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent-NCBC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL G...
Raj Kumar vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 2656/2017 Judgment delivered on:22. 03.2018 RAJ KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus Advocates who appeared in this case: THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Kartickay Mathur with Mr. Sanket Gupta, Advocates. Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, APP for the State. SI Arti, PS Patel Nagar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2203.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 21437/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 2656/2017 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.314/2017 under Section 376 IPC, Police Station Patel Nagar. BAIL APPLN. 2656/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner is the boyfriend of the prosecutrix and on the false promise of marriage he entered into physical relationship with the prosecutrix. It is alleged that the petitioner assured the prosecutrix that he would get marri...
Kunwar Neeraj vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 943/2015 Reserved on: March 07, 2018 Date of decision: March 22, 2018 SATYAPAL SINGH ...Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur with Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for the State. + CRL.A. 1002/2015 And KUNWAR NEERAJ STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, ...Appellant Advocate versus Through: Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for... RESPONDENTthe State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT2203.2018 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 27th April 2015 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01 (New Delhi District), Patiala House Courts in Sessions Case No.127 of 2013 arising out of FIR No.17 of 2013 registered at Police Station (PS) Sagarpur convicting the Appellants, Kunwar Neeraj (A-1) and Satyapal Singh (A-4), for the Crl.A. 943/2015 & 1002/2015 Page 1 of 30 offences Section 302 Indian Penal C...
Anil Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2017 22 .03.2018 CRL.A. 833/2012 ANIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jitendra Sethi, Mr. Ambar Tewari, Mr. Hemant Gulati & Mr.Aditya Madan, Ms. Anshika Sethi, Advocates. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. TEJI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred to assail the judgment dated 16.04.2012 whereby the learned ASJ-II (North-West) Rohini Courts in SC No.1231/2010 arising out of FIR No.153/2010, registered at PS Keshav Puram, convicted the appellant under Section 392/397/of IPC. The trial court also found the appellant guilty of offences committed under Sections 25, 27, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act.2. He has been sentenced vide order dated 23.11.2012 as follows: Crl. A. 833/2012 Page 1 of 35 1. The convict Anil Kumar to Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 10 (T...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.amit Tanwar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA1362017& CM APPL. 4704/2017 (Stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. .. Appellants Through: Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel for Nr.DMC with Ms. Supreet Bimbra, Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocates Mr. S.C. Meena, EE (Project Narela) versus AMIT TANWAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nusrat Hossain & Mr. Manish CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Kumar Singh, Advocates Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various w...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.kamal Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22nd January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA2082017 & CM APPL.6941/2017 (stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .. Appellant Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate (M- 9873316904) Versus KAMAL GUPTA + ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate (M- AND965050021) RFA5632017 & CM APPL. 21095/2017 (Stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .. Appellant Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. KAMAL GUPTA CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgement...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.harpreet Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA4312017 & CM Nos.15969/2017 & 15971/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Adv.(M:9873316904) versus Mr. Vikas Sharma, Adv. ..... Respondent HARPREET ARORA CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »