Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs.sanjeev Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA4302017 & CM Nos.15925/2017 & 15926/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Adv.(M:9873316904) versus ..... Respondent SANJEEV KUMAR CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the Engine...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.munish Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d January, 2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 + RFA447& CM APPL. 16332/2017(stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. MUNISH ANAND Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate. versus ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Respondent Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the Engineer...
Mohit Electronics vs.the Workman Tahir Hussain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 6284/2004 Reserved on:9. h November, 2017 Pronounced on:22. d March, 2018 MOHIT ELECTRONICS ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Viraj Datar and Vineet Jhanji, Advocates THE WORKMAN TAHIR HUSSAIN Versus ... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal, Ms. Mehgna and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. Alleging that his services had been illegally terminated by the petitioner, the respondent initiated an industrial dispute, which was referred, by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the GNCTD), for adjudication to the Labour Court, vide Order No F.24 (4875)/2000-Lab dated 7th February, 2001, with the following term of reference: Whether the services of Sh. Tahir Hussain have been terminated illegally and/or unjustifiably by the management WP (C) 6284/2004 Page 1 2. and if so, to what reliefs he entitled and what directions are necess...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.varinderjeet Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA502017& CM APPL. 1707/2017 (Stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .. Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel for Nr.DMC with Ms. Supreet Bimbra, Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocates Mr. S.C. Meena, EE (Project Narela) versus VARINDERJEET SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Cont...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.sakina Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~5 * % + Date of Decision:22. d March, 2018 FAO4292016 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate ..... Appellant versus SAKINA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Ravina Kant, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS No.1 to 4. Mr.Amit Kumar Maihan, Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the impugned order dated 31st March, 2016 whereby the Commissioner, Employees Compensation has awarded compensation of Rs.6,45,840/- to respondents no.1 to 4.2. On 12th December, 2012, late Lalit Yadav was driving vehicle No.HR-37-C-2680. Lalit Yadav met with an accident during the course of his employment with respondent no.5 which resulted in fatal injuries. The deceased was survived by his widow, mother and two children who filed an application for compensation before the Commissioner, Employees Compensation.3. The Commissioner, Employees Compensation held that the ac...
Jogindher G. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 22, 20181) + W.P.(C) 3073/20172) + W.P.(C) 3074/20173) + W.P.(C) 3075/20174) + W.P.(C) 3076/20175) + W.P.(C) 3077/20176) + W.P.(C) 3078/20177) + W.P.(C) 3079/2017 & C.M. 14964/20178) + W.P.(C) 3080/20179) + W.P.(C) 3081/201710) + W.P.(C) 3082/201711) + W.P.(C) 3083/201712) + W.P.(C) 3084/2017 KETAN JOGINDHER G. SANJEEV VINAY CHETULE GIRI SANKAR S. CHITHARANJAN MADDIKUNTA SIDDHARTHA SHASHANK RATNOO NARENDRA KUMAR SHAH SHREERANJANI K SAGAR CHOURASIA & ANR RAHUL KUMAR GAGAN B G ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr.Vikram Hegde, Mr. Prateek Chadha & Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advocates W.P.(C) 3073/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 1. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Devik Singh, Advocates for respondent-UPSC Mr. R. Sathish and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent-NCBC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL G...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.gautam Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA4252017 & CM No.15765/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Appellants GAUTAM ANAND Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Adv.(M:9873316904) versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. (M:9650560021) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and the...
Sagar Chourasia & Anr vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 22, 20181) + W.P.(C) 3073/20172) + W.P.(C) 3074/20173) + W.P.(C) 3075/20174) + W.P.(C) 3076/20175) + W.P.(C) 3077/20176) + W.P.(C) 3078/20177) + W.P.(C) 3079/2017 & C.M. 14964/20178) + W.P.(C) 3080/20179) + W.P.(C) 3081/201710) + W.P.(C) 3082/201711) + W.P.(C) 3083/201712) + W.P.(C) 3084/2017 KETAN JOGINDHER G. SANJEEV VINAY CHETULE GIRI SANKAR S. CHITHARANJAN MADDIKUNTA SIDDHARTHA SHASHANK RATNOO NARENDRA KUMAR SHAH SHREERANJANI K SAGAR CHOURASIA & ANR RAHUL KUMAR GAGAN B G ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr.Vikram Hegde, Mr. Prateek Chadha & Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advocates W.P.(C) 3073/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 1. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Devik Singh, Advocates for respondent-UPSC Mr. R. Sathish and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent-NCBC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL G...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.munish Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA427& CM. APPL.15905/2017 (Stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellants MUNISH ANAND CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the Engine...
Babu & Ors vs.nain Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. 03.2018 RSA1982015, C.M.9221-22/2015 BABU & ORS Through: Mr. J.K. Jain, Adv. ..... Appellants versus NAIN SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.K. Shukla, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This second appeal impugns the judgment and decree in Suit No.30/2013 dated 11.12.2006 as well as the order of the First Appellate Court upholding the same on 22.04.2015. The respondents (plaintiffs) had sought permanent injunction against the appellants from being dispossessed by the appellants from Khasra No.185 admeasuring 1 bigha, 1 biswa situated in revenue estate of village Sabhapur, Delhi. The suit was decreed vide judgment dated 22.04.2015.2. The plaintiffs had claimed that the suit land occupied by them formed a part of Khasra No.185. The defendants/appellants had contended that the suit property fell in Khasra No.186.3. The Trial Court had considered the site plan filed...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »