Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandeep Chhillar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~159 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment decided on:23. 03.2018 + W.P. (C) 3045/2018, CM. APPL. 12124 - 12125 SANDEEP CHHILLAR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Gupta, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Shiva Laxmi Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Ms. Shiva Laxmi accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.2. Counsels are agreed that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the judgement dated 22.3.2018 passed in various writ petitions including W.P.(C) No.2472/2018, titled: Puja Tandon and Anr. vs. Registrar of Companies and Ors.3. Mr. Mohit Gupta, who appears for the petitioner, says that the petitioner has approached the NCLT for reviving Landmark Sez Cityplanner Private Limited (in short LSCPL) and wishes to approach the NCLT to revive Landmark Television Network Pvt. Limited (in short LTNPL). In sum, t...
M/S. Baptist Union of North India vs.baptish Church Trust Association ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d March, 2018 M/S. BAPTIST UNION OF NORTH INDIA CONT.CAS(C) 34/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Advocate. BAPTISH CHURCH TRUST ASSOCIATION & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Senior Advocate & Mr. P.S. Bindra, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Vaibhav Tyagi and Mr. Piyush Singh, Advocates (M:97110. 7680) for R-8. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CONT. CASE342017 1. This is a Contempt Petition (Civil) filed by Mr. Paul N. Prem (hereinafter, Petitioner) seeking to represent the Baptist Union of North India, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-05 against the Baptist Church Trust Association/Respondent No.1 (hereinafter, BCTA) and its office bearers who are arrayed as Respondent Nos.2 to 7, herein. The basis of the contempt is order dated 2nd March, 2015 r/w order dated 26th April, 2016 passed by this Court in RFA1322015. Relevant portion...
Lekh Ram & Anr vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 247/2002 LEKH RAM & ANR .....Appellants Reserved on:8. h March, 2018 Decided on:23. d March, 2018 Through: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv with Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu (DHCLSC) and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs versus STATE OF DELHI ....Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State Insp. Arvind Kumar, PS Jaffar Kalan CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11th March 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.190/1999 arising out of FIR No.93/1999 at Police Station (PS) Jaffar Pur Kalan convicting both the Appellants for the offences under Sections 498A and 304B IPC. The appeal is also directed against the order on sentence dated 19th March 2002 whereby, for the offence under Section 304B IPC, both the Appellants were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and, for the offence under Section 498A IPC, to ...
Kailash Gahlot & Ors. Vs.election Commission of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.750/2018 % Reserved on:28. h February, 2018 Date of Decision:23. d March, 2018 KAILASH GAHLOT & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashist, Mr. Sameer Vashist, Mr. J.P. Gupta, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Ms. Astha Gupta, Mr. Manashwy Jha and Mr. Ravi Raghunath, Advocates. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Ms. Ayiala Imti and Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocates for ECI. Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC, Ms. Rajul Jain with Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD. Mr. Mudit Gupta and Mr. Sangam Kumar, Advocates for R-4. WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.751/2018 RAJESH RISHI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashist, Mr. Sameer Vashist, Mr. J.P. Gupta, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Ms. Astha Gupta, Mr....
Govind vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + GOVIND CRL.A. 81/2015 Reserved on: March 08, 2018 Decided on: March 23, 2018 ...Appellant Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. % STATE versus Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP... RESPONDENTCORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 8th December 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II (ASJ), (North-West), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.147/2013 arising out of FIR No.244/2013 registered at Police Station (PS) Sultanpuri convicting the Appellant, Govind, for the offence punishable under Section 302 Indian Penal Code (IPC), and the order on sentence dated 15th December 2014 whereby he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life with the further condition that he would spend at least 25 years in actual custody and shall not be considered for grant of remission till he CRL.A. 81/2015 Page 1 of 18 undergoes an actu...
M vs.A
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d March, 2018 CM(M) 140/2017 M A Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Mr. Shamim, ........ Petitioner Ms. Charu Dalal and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Advs. versus Through: Ms. Jhuma Bose, Adv. with ..... Respondent respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 An important question of law has arisen for consideration in this case as to whether the parties married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 can be permitted to challenge jurisdiction of the Family Court to entertain and try a petition for dissolution of marriage under the Special Marriage Act.2. The petitioner and the respondent got married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 on 20th August, 1998. On 29th September, 2014, the respondent instituted a petition for divorce against the petitioner under Section 27(1) (a) (b) and (d) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The Certificate of Marriage under the Special Marriage Act was filed by the respodnent a...
Ashish Chadha vs.master Aarav Chadha (Minor) Thr. His Natural Guradian ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : MARCH23 2018 CRL.REV.P. 257/2018 & Crl.M.A.Nos.5423-24/2018 ASHISH CHADHA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Dilip Gupta with Mr.Ravi Yadav, Advocates. + versus MASTER AARAV CHADHA (MINOR) THR. HIS NATURAL GURADIAN (MOTHER) NEXT FRIEND NOMITA CHADHA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : None. ..... Respondent S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 22.02.2018 whereby maintenance @ `25,000/- w.e.f. 2.1.2017 has been directed to be paid to the respondent, his minor son.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the file. Relationship between the petitioner and the respondent is not at dispute. It is also not in dispute that at present the respondent is in the custody of his mother and she is taking care of him; being aged around four years.3. By the impugned order the petitioner has been di...
G S Tayal vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: March 13, 2018 Judgment delivered on: March 23, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3606/2015 G S TAYAL Through: In person versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Monika Arora, SC for JNU with Mr. Vibhu Tripathi, Mr. Kushal Kumar & Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"PRAYER (1) It is respectfully submitted that this Honble Court be pleased to admit the writ petition in the interest of the justice. (2) Your Lordship be pleased to order to pay the arrears of enhanced salary w.e.f 01/01/1996 and to grant annual increment w.e.f. 01/04/1996 at par with his counterpart, i.e Mrs. V.B. Vohra Assistant Finance Officer, and thereafter on 1st April of each W.P.(C) No.3606/2015 Page 1 of 12 2. till the year consequent retirement, with consequential retirement benefits such a...
Rajesh Gupta vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.750/2018 % Reserved on:28. h February, 2018 Date of Decision:23. d March, 2018 KAILASH GAHLOT & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashist, Mr. Sameer Vashist, Mr. J.P. Gupta, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Ms. Astha Gupta, Mr. Manashwy Jha and Mr. Ravi Raghunath, Advocates. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Ms. Ayiala Imti and Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocates for ECI. Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC, Ms. Rajul Jain with Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD. Mr. Mudit Gupta and Mr. Sangam Kumar, Advocates for R-4. WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.751/2018 RAJESH RISHI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashist, Mr. Sameer Vashist, Mr. J.P. Gupta, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Ms. Astha Gupta, Mr....
Sandeep Kumar Arora vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~31 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2440/2018 and CM No.10122/2018 % Date of decision :23. d March, 2018 SANDEEP KUMAR ARORA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Alok Kumar Kuchhal, Mr. Manish Jain and Ms. Chanchal Yadav, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The petitioner was the Director of Strydz Corporate Services Private Limited. The Director of the company had submitted his resignation to the Board of Directors on 15th December, 2009. However, the Board of Directors failed to file Form 32 with the Registrar of Companies.2. The writ petitioner inter alia seeks quashing of the notices dated 6th September, 2017 and 12th September, 2017 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs at New Delhi. W.P.(C)No.2440/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. At the time of issuance of noti...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »