Skip to content

Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 22 2018

Shashank Ratnoo vs.union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 22, 20181) + W.P.(C) 3073/20172) + W.P.(C) 3074/20173) + W.P.(C) 3075/20174) + W.P.(C) 3076/20175) + W.P.(C) 3077/20176) + W.P.(C) 3078/20177) + W.P.(C) 3079/2017 & C.M. 14964/20178) + W.P.(C) 3080/20179) + W.P.(C) 3081/201710) + W.P.(C) 3082/201711) + W.P.(C) 3083/201712) + W.P.(C) 3084/2017 KETAN JOGINDHER G. SANJEEV VINAY CHETULE GIRI SANKAR S. CHITHARANJAN MADDIKUNTA SIDDHARTHA SHASHANK RATNOO NARENDRA KUMAR SHAH SHREERANJANI K SAGAR CHOURASIA & ANR RAHUL KUMAR GAGAN B G ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr.Vikram Hegde, Mr. Prateek Chadha & Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advocates W.P.(C) 3073/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 1. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Devik Singh, Advocates for respondent-UPSC Mr. R. Sathish and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent-NCBC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL G...


Mar 22 2018

Jain Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs.state Bank of Saurashtra & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.272/2018 + % JAIN EXPORTS PVT. LTD. Reserved on:19. h March, 2018 Pronounced on:22. d March, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Advocate. Through: versus STATE BANK OF SAURASHTRA & ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J CM No.10619/2018 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.272/2018 2. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 21.11.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs. 33,80,316/- against respondent No.1/defendant No.1/State Bank of Saurashtra. It RFA No.272/2018 Page 1 of 9 is noted that the suit was originally filed as an order XXXVII CPC suit and there were two defendants in the suit, with the defendant No.2 being Sh. R.P. Mathu...


Mar 22 2018

Yogesh Bansal & Anr vs.union of India and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:22. d March, 2018 $~18 * % + W.P.(C) 12039/2015 YOGESH BANSAL & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. D.V. Khatri, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Harsh Pandit and Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Shahi, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Mr. Hem Kumar, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court after removing the objections, which is taken on record.2. Pleadings are complete. The writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petit...


Mar 22 2018

East Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.raj Kumar Jain

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January , 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 RFA422017 & CM APPL. 1333/2017 (stay) + EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .. Appellant Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing for EDMC with Ms. and Ms. Vasundhara Counsel Anushruti Nayyar, Advocates. versus RAJ KUMAR JAIN CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. ..... Respondent Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were exec...


Mar 22 2018

North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.kamlesh Kumar Gupta

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h January, 2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 + RFA4102017 & CM APPL. 15371/2017 (Stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellants & ANR. Through: Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel for Nr.DMC with Ms. Supreet Bimbra, Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocates. KAMLESH KUMAR GUPTA versus ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the C...


Mar 22 2018

Usha Rani vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1057/2017 & CRL.M.(BAIL)2048/2017 Reserved on: March 12, 2018 Date of decision: March 22, 2018 USHA RANI STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Joginder Tuli with Ms. Joshini Tuli, Mr. Ashu Kumar Sharma and Ms. Divya Jangid, Advocates. Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State with Insp. Tribhuvan Negi PS N.D.R.S. and Insp. Bala Shankaran, PS Kashmere Gate. + CRL.A. 1058/2017 & CRL.M.(BAIL)2049/2017 USHA RANI STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Joginder Tuli with Ms. Joshini Tuli, Mr. Ashu Kumar Sharma and Ms. Divya Jangid, Advocates. Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State with Insp. Tribhuvan Negi PS N.D.R.S. and Insp. Bala Shankaran, PS Kashmere Gate. Crl.A. 1057/2017 & 1058/2017 Page 1 of 13 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 These two appeals have been filed by the same Appellant, Us...


Mar 22 2018

North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.sanjeev Oberoi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA4202017 & CM No.15681/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Adv.(M:9873316904) versus ..... Respondent SANJEEV OBEROI CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the Engineer-in-Charge ha...


Mar 22 2018

North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.munish Anand

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d January, 2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 + RFA4392017 & CM APPLs.16067/2017, 16069/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .. Appellants & ANR. Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate. Versus MUNISH ANAND ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the ...


Mar 22 2018

Apeejay School and Anr vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved On- 09.02.2018. Date of Decision- 22.03.2018. RP No.46/2018 in LPA3882017 APEEJAY SCHOOL AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. H.L.Tiku, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Yashmeet Kaur, Advocate Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil) with Ms.Minal Sehgal, Advocate for R-1. Mr.C.S.Parashar, Advocate with Ms.Jyotsna Parashar, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J1 This petition seeks review of our judgment and order dated 10.11.2017, passed in LPA No.10975/2017, whereby the concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below were upheld and the appeal was dismissed vide a detailed reasoned judgment examining every aspect including the submissions made by the learned Senior counsel for the... Petitioners. RP462018 in LPA3882017 Page 1 of 6 2. This judgment was assailed by the... Petitioners under Article 136 of the C...


Mar 22 2018

North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.vipin Gupta

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 RFA1602017 & CM APPL. 5807/2017 (Stay) + NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .. Appellant VIPIN GUPTA Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgments are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the Engineer-in-Charg...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial