Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Ramco Steels Private Limited vs.state Bank of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.282/2018 21st March, 2018 M/S RAMCO STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. ..... Appellant Sandeep Bajaj, Ms. Aakanksha and Ms. Shourya Mittal, Advocates. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 7.10.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.27,22,124.50 from two defendants. Defendant No.1/respondent No.1 is the State Bank of India which was the banker of the appellant/plaintiff at New Delhi. Defendant No.2 in the suit is the foreign buyer. RFA No.282/2018 Page 1 of 18 2. The facts of the case are that appellant/plaintiff pleads that it had a contract to export elastic clips to the ...
Virender Kumar Trehan & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:21. t March, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3620/2015 VIRENDER KUMAR TREHAN & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Mr. Vinod versus Pandey, Mr. Kunal Arora & Mr. Sekh Zakir Hussain, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ORS CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla with Mr. Kamaldeep, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners seek a direction to quash the notification bearing no.F(11)(17)/91 L&B/LA/6518 dated 28.04.1995 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short the Act) as also the notification bearing no.F.11(17)/91/L&B/LA/Pt.V/1285 dated 26.04.2013 issued under Section 6 of the Act.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this writ pet...
National Insurance Company Limited vs.nirmala Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
$~23 & 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: March 21, 2018 MAC.APP. 508/2015 + 1. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate versus PREMWATI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Syed Hasan Isfahani and Mr.Vikas Yadav, Advocates MAC.APP. 511/2015 & CM No.11562/2015 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate versus NIRMALA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Syed Hasan Isfahani and Mr.Vikas Yadav, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals are directed against Award of 31st March, 2015 whereby two claim petitions arising out of one vehicular Mac.A.Nos.508/2015 & 511/2015 Page 1 accident which took place on 16th July, 2007, have been decided. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, both these appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment. The facts as noted in the impugned Awar...
Kishan vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
$~5 to 8 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 34/2018 & CRL.M.(B) 44/2018 + + SURESH @ PAWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate and Mr. Sanjeev Yadav, Advocate STATE versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 159/2018 & CRL.M.(B) 247/2018 ISLAM Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP. ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.A. 162/2018 & CRL.M.(B) 250/2018 KALIM @ SONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. + CRL.A. 163/2018 & CRL.M.(B) 251/2018 KISHAN Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate ..... Appellant versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent CRL.A.34/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 21 Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP + CRL.A. 61/2018 & CRL.M.(B) 115/2018 SADDAQ HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chanan Parwani, Advocate with Ms. Sajni Kachwaha and...
Punita Kaur vs.director, Directorate of Education and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 21, 2018 T.P. SINGH PUNITA KAUR W.P.(C) 2723/2018 W.P.(C) 2733/2018 .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhimanuyi Sharma and Ms. Deepali, Advocates versus DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitish Singh and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates for respondent No.1 (in W.P.(C) 2723/2018) Mr. Sujeet K. Mishra, Advocate for respondent No.1 (in W.P.(C) 2733/2018) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1... Petitioners in ORDER (ORAL) the above-captioned two petitions seek implementation of orders of 14th February, 2013 and 18th February, 2013 vide which respondent-School has been directed to implement 6th Pay Commissions Recommendations in terms of order of 11th February, 2009 of respondent-Directorate of Education.2. Since the subject matter in the above-captioned two petitions is identical, therefore, they are taken up for hearing together and by this common order, they are bein...
Soni Dave vs.m/s Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
$~6 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:21. 03.2018 EX. F.A. 29/2017 SONI DAVE Through: Mr. Saurabh Prakash, Mr. Kunal Jain, and Mr. Utsav ..... Appellant Gosain, Advocates. Versus M/S TRANS ASIAN INDUSTRIES EXPOSITIONS PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Reyaz A. Jan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. ..... Respondent Nidhi Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This Execution First Appeal is under Order XXI Rule 58 read with section 151 CPC from the order dated 30.10.2017 which declined relief to the appellant regarding the arrears of use and occupation charges. The case was adjourned to 19.01.2018 and put up for consideration apropos the payment of cost.2. It is the appellants case that the suit property bearing No.M-1, Hauz Khas, New Delhi was leased out to the respondent for some time; they vacated the premises on 21.10.2016; the property was left in a bad shape and some payments were made after the due date; hence, the appellants made ...
District and Sessions Courts Employees Welfare Association & Anr. Vs.d ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 21, 2018 W.P.(C) 2719/2018 & CM110392018 DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURTS EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Nisha Sharma, Ms. Chandrika Gupta and Ms. Vandna Aneja, Advocates versus DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE (HEADQUARTERS) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N.K. Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3- GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) For the relief sought in this petition, petitioners had made a composite Representation (Annexure P-8) on 23rd September, 2017. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the said Representation (Annexure P-8) was followed by another Representation of 23rd November, 2017 vide which relaxation of conditions regarding filling up of vacant posts of the subordinate staff was sought. W.P.(C) 2719/2018 Page 1 of 2 2. The grievance of pe...
C Edmonds Allen vs.cbi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 1456/2018 Judgment delivered on:21. 03.2018 C EDMONDS ALLEN versus CBI & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr Sanjeev Bhandari, Mr Harshvardhan Jha, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2103.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 5293-94/2018(exemption), 5395/2018(exemption from filing FIR) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1456/2018 1. The petitioner seeks a direction to the Trial Court to dispose of the application dated 20.09.2016 filed by the petitioner before the Trial Court.2. The petitioner in the subject proceedings, being the original complainant, has filed an application seeking cancellation of bail of Respondent No.2 in R.C.No.2(A)/2006/ACU IX/CBI /PS/CBI/SC-I/ND. CRL.M.C. 1456/2018 Page 1 of 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is restricted on...
Wockhardt Limited vs.maha Avtar Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 694/2018 WOCKHARDT LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Piyush Joshi, Advocate. Versus MAHA AVTAR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through Ex parte % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:21. t March, 2018 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright dilution, unfair competition, for rendition of accounts of profits/damages, delivery up etc. The prayer clause in the suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"(a) To grant a decree for permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, its directors, principal officers, servants, retailers, stockiest, distributors, representatives and agents from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, stocking, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in any pharmaceutical products or any allied and cognate products under trademark SPAS PROXIVON or any other trade mark / marks which are identical / ...
Janardhan vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.649 /2002 JANARDHAN Reserved on:8. h March, 2018 Decided on:21. t March, 2018 ....Appellant Through: Mr. Jitender Ratta, Advocate. versus THE STATE ....Respondent Through: Mr K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 28th January, 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Delhi in Sessions Case No.arising out of an FIR No.522/1996 registered at Police Station (PS) Karol Bagh convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 302 Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 29th January, 2002 sentencing him to imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for one week.2. At the outset it requires to be noticed that the Appellant and the co- accused Satish (Accused No.2 A2) (Proclaimed Offender - PO) were c...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »