Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.rajwans Vadhera
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d January, 2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 + RFA5702017 & CM APPL. 21299/2017 (Stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Ms. Supreet Bimbra, Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocates. Mr. S.C. Meena, EE (Project Narela) versus RAJWANS VADHERA Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were place...
East Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.ashwani Kumar Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January , 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 RFA432017 & CM APPL. 1337/2017 (stay) + EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .. Appellant Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing for EDMC with Ms. and Ms. Vasundhara Counsel Anushruti Nayyar, Advocates. versus ASHWANI KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works w...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.munish Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d January, 2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 + RFA421& CM APPL.15684/2017 (stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. .. Appellants Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate. Versus MUNISH ANAND ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the Engineer-in...
Shri Sandeep Aggarwal & Ors vs.shri Jai Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d March, 2018 C.R.P. 104/2013 and CM86482013 and 41805/2016 SHRI SANDEEP AGGARWAL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Tanu Singhal and Mr. Vivek Srivastava, Advocates versus SHRI JAI SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arvind Bhatt and Mr. Kuber Giri, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The revision petition at hand seeks to assail the order dated 20.02.2013 of the executing court on the file of the execution case no.whereby the objection petition of the petitioners under Order 21 Rule 99 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was held to be time barred and therefore, not maintainable, the application to this effect of the respondent (decree holder) under Order 7 Rule 11 (d) of the CPC read with Section 3(1) and Article 128 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 CPC being allowed and the proceedings arising out of the execution application closed, satisfaction of the decree ...
S. Chitharanjan vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 22, 20181) + W.P.(C) 3073/20172) + W.P.(C) 3074/20173) + W.P.(C) 3075/20174) + W.P.(C) 3076/20175) + W.P.(C) 3077/20176) + W.P.(C) 3078/20177) + W.P.(C) 3079/2017 & C.M. 14964/20178) + W.P.(C) 3080/20179) + W.P.(C) 3081/201710) + W.P.(C) 3082/201711) + W.P.(C) 3083/201712) + W.P.(C) 3084/2017 KETAN JOGINDHER G. SANJEEV VINAY CHETULE GIRI SANKAR S. CHITHARANJAN MADDIKUNTA SIDDHARTHA SHASHANK RATNOO NARENDRA KUMAR SHAH SHREERANJANI K SAGAR CHOURASIA & ANR RAHUL KUMAR GAGAN B G ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr.Vikram Hegde, Mr. Prateek Chadha & Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advocates W.P.(C) 3073/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 1. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Devik Singh, Advocates for respondent-UPSC Mr. R. Sathish and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent-NCBC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL G...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.gautam Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d January, 2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 RFA4222017& CM APPL. 15687/2017 (ex-parte stay) + NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .. Appellant & ANR. Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate. (M- 9873316904) Versus GAUTAM ANAND ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate (M- CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH965050021) Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the C...
North Delhi Muncipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.sanjeev Oberoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision 22nd March, 2018 RFA4402017 & CM APPLs. Nos. 16071/2017 (Stay) & 16073/2017 (Delay) NORTH DELHI MUNCIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. .. Appellants Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate (M- 9873316904). versus SANJEEV OBEROI ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors an...
Karan Singh & Ors vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 22, 2018 W.P.(C) 2477/2017 KARAN SINGH & ORS versus .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.P. Sethi, Advocate UNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Dr. G.L. Bhatia, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Vedant Singh and Mr. Michelle Gomes, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Grant of enhanced gratuity of `10 lacs is sought by petitioners w.e.f. 1st January, 2006 while claiming that they are the retired employees under the Central Dearness Allowance (hereinafter referred to CDA) Pay Pattern. The grievance of petitioners counsel is that the benefit of Circular of 8th October, 2010 (Annexure P-1) granting enhancement of maximum limit of gratuity from `3.5 lacs to `10 lacs to the retired employees under the Industrial Dearness Allowance (IDA) Pay Pattern has not been extended to the retired employees under the CDA Pay Pattern.2. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent-Cement C...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs.mohit Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 RFA5732017& CM APPLs. Nos. 21410/2017 (Stay) & 21412/2017 (Delay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. .. Appellants Through: Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel for Nr.DMC with Ms. Supreet Bimbra, Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocates Mr. S.C. Meena, EE (Project Narela) MOHIT GUPTA versus ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were place...
Madan Lal Wadhwa vs.gurpreet Kaur & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d March, 2018 CM(M) 147/2017 and CM48082017 MADAN LAL WADHWA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.K. Wadhwa, son of the petitioner versus GURPREET KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Respondent no.1 in person Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava,Adv. for R-2 Ms. Aishwarya Rao for Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) The petition at hand seeks to assail the order dated 29.09.2016 1. passed by the Civil Judge on the file of the civil suit (CS No.234/16) which was instituted by the first respondent (hereinafter referred to as, the plaintiff) against the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) on 19.01.2015, seeking reliefs in the nature of permanent injunction. It may be mentioned here that the defendant (i.e. the petitioner herein), while contesting the said suit, had also submitted a counter-claim seeking, in turn, certain reliefs against the plaintiff (i.e. the respondent...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »