Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manju & Anr vs.reliance General Insurance Co Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d March, 2018 Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate ..... Appellants $~53 * % + MAC.APP. 1121/2017 MANJU & ANR versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arun Yadav, Advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.8,14,564/- has been awarded to them.2. The accident dated 14th July, 2014 resulted in the death of Jitender. The deceased was aged 18 years and was survived by his parents. It was claimed that the deceased was in a private job earning Rs.15,000/- per month. However, the Claims Tribunal took minimum wages of Rs.8,554/-, deducted towards his personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 11 to compute the loss of dependency as Rs.5,14,564/-. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,50,000/- towards loss of love and affection, Rs.50,000/- towards loss of estate and R...
Ketan vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 22, 20181) + W.P.(C) 3073/20172) + W.P.(C) 3074/20173) + W.P.(C) 3075/20174) + W.P.(C) 3076/20175) + W.P.(C) 3077/20176) + W.P.(C) 3078/20177) + W.P.(C) 3079/2017 & C.M. 14964/20178) + W.P.(C) 3080/20179) + W.P.(C) 3081/201710) + W.P.(C) 3082/201711) + W.P.(C) 3083/201712) + W.P.(C) 3084/2017 KETAN JOGINDHER G. SANJEEV VINAY CHETULE GIRI SANKAR S. CHITHARANJAN MADDIKUNTA SIDDHARTHA SHASHANK RATNOO NARENDRA KUMAR SHAH SHREERANJANI K SAGAR CHOURASIA & ANR RAHUL KUMAR GAGAN B G ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr.Vikram Hegde, Mr. Prateek Chadha & Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advocates W.P.(C) 3073/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 1. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Devik Singh, Advocates for respondent-UPSC Mr. R. Sathish and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent-NCBC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL G...
Shreeranjani K vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 22, 20181) + W.P.(C) 3073/20172) + W.P.(C) 3074/20173) + W.P.(C) 3075/20174) + W.P.(C) 3076/20175) + W.P.(C) 3077/20176) + W.P.(C) 3078/20177) + W.P.(C) 3079/2017 & C.M. 14964/20178) + W.P.(C) 3080/20179) + W.P.(C) 3081/201710) + W.P.(C) 3082/201711) + W.P.(C) 3083/201712) + W.P.(C) 3084/2017 KETAN JOGINDHER G. SANJEEV VINAY CHETULE GIRI SANKAR S. CHITHARANJAN MADDIKUNTA SIDDHARTHA SHASHANK RATNOO NARENDRA KUMAR SHAH SHREERANJANI K SAGAR CHOURASIA & ANR RAHUL KUMAR GAGAN B G ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr.Vikram Hegde, Mr. Prateek Chadha & Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advocates W.P.(C) 3073/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 1. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Devik Singh, Advocates for respondent-UPSC Mr. R. Sathish and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent-NCBC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL G...
Pawan Kumar and Ors vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~52. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2805/2018 and CM APPL. 11321-322/2018 1. PAWAN KUMAR AND ORS Through: Mr. Sajan K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Malvika Trivedi and Ms. Sriparna Choudhary, Advocates for R-1/NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % ORDER2203.2018 The petitioners have challenged an order dated 08.02.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, dismissing O.A. No.2028/2016 filed by them, wherein they had sought quashing of the order dated 11.05.2016 issued by the respondent No.1/New Delhi Municipal Council ( in short, NDMC), cancelling their promotion order to the post of Fitter Grade-II and for restoration of their promotion with all consequential benefits.2. The brief facts of the case as gathered from the pleadings in the O.A. placed on record are that the petitioners were initially appointed in the NDMC as Beldars. ...
Capt. Deepak Gupta vs.pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CAPT. DEEPAK GUPTA RFA No.268/2018 Reserved on:19. h March, 2018 Pronounced on:22. d March, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev Lochan, Advocate. versus PAWAN HANS HELICOPTERS LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. Appl. No.10234/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.10235/2018 (for seeking permission to file dim and untyped annexures) 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. C.M. Appl. No.10236/2018 (for delay) 3. For the reasons stated in this application, the delay of 11 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned, subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.268/2018 Page 1 of 15 RFA No.268/2018S4 This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the defendant No.1 in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial...
Food Corporation of India Handling Worker Union vs.the Chairman Cum Ma ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:06. 03.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:22.03.2018 LPA772018 & C.M. No.7728/2018 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA HANDLING WORKER UNION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.M. Sinha, Advocate along with Mr. P.M. Sinha, Advocate. versus CHAIRMAN THE CORPORATION OF INDIA CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR FOOD ..... Respondent Through: Shri. Om Prakash, Advocate along with Mr. Pradeep Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Anil Kapoor, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA LPA772018 Page 1 of 12 JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present Letter Patents Appeal under clause 10 of the Letter Patents Act assails an interim order dated 06.02.2018, rendered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in C.M. No.3868/2018 in Writ Petition (C) No.9260/2016 titled as Food Corporation of India Handling Worker Union v. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as the subject writ petition).2. By...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.bharat Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA1672017& CM APPL. 5843/2017 (Stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate. versus .. Appellants BHARAT ARORA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the Engine...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr vs.gautam Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22. d March, 2018 + RFA4192017 & CM No.15678/2017 (stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .... Appellants & ANR Through : Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate GAUTAM ANAND versus (M9873316904) ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. (M:9650560021) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contrac...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs.gautam Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22nd January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA4362017 & CM APPL.15990/2017 (stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate (M- 9873316904) GAUTAM ANAND versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and th...
Dr Vanitha R vs.ministry of Ayush & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2018
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. 03.2018. Date of Decision:22. 03.2018. + W.P.(C) 2296/2018 & C.M. No.9533/2018 DR VANITHA R Through: Mr.V.P. Bhasin, Mr.Arjun Pant, Adv. ..... PETITIONER Singh, Mr.Vinay Sr. Advs. with versus MINISTRY OF AYUSH & ANR ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, ASG with Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Mr.Prateek Dhanda & Mr.Saeed Qadri, Advs. for UOI. Ms.Tasneem Ahmadi with Ms.Mahima Rathi, Adv. for R Mr.T.K. intervenor. Joseph, Adv. for CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J Vide the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the JUDGMENT1 Constitution of India, the... Petitioner, a practitioner of Ayurvedic Medicine, is seeking quashing of letter dated 08.03.2018 issued by Respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Letter), W.P.(C) 2296/2018 Page 1 of 18 whereby it has been held that her tenure as President of Respondent No.2/Central Council of Indian Medicine (hereinafter refer...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »