Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 22 2018

North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs.shiv Shankar Gupta

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA5712017& CM APPL. 21357/2017 (Stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. .. Appellants Through: Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel for Nr.DMC with Ms. Supreet Bimbra, Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocates Mr. S.C. Meena, EE (Project Narela) versus SHIV SHANKAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2018

Shamshad & Ors vs.the State & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d March, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 764/2018 SHAMSHAD & ORS ........ Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Habibur Rahman, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Ms. Kamna Vohra, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Arun Kumar and W/SI Neetu, PS Bhajan Pura. Ms. Prabha Mishra, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.88/2016 under Sections 376/377/5IPC registered at PS Bhajanpura, Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto.2. The petitioners had earlier filed the a petition seeking quashing of FIR on the ground that parties have settled the matter however, considering that the offence alleged were serious in nature and quashing of the FIR with such serious offences cannot be done on the basis of settlement, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn vide order d...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2018

North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.sanjeev Oberoi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :24. h January, 2018 Date of decision :22nd March, 2018 + RFA4182017 & CM APPL.15675/2017 (stay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Adv.(M:9873316904) versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellants SANJEEV OBEROI CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the Engineer-in-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2018

Maddikunta Siddhartha vs.union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 22, 20181) + W.P.(C) 3073/20172) + W.P.(C) 3074/20173) + W.P.(C) 3075/20174) + W.P.(C) 3076/20175) + W.P.(C) 3077/20176) + W.P.(C) 3078/20177) + W.P.(C) 3079/2017 & C.M. 14964/20178) + W.P.(C) 3080/20179) + W.P.(C) 3081/201710) + W.P.(C) 3082/201711) + W.P.(C) 3083/201712) + W.P.(C) 3084/2017 KETAN JOGINDHER G. SANJEEV VINAY CHETULE GIRI SANKAR S. CHITHARANJAN MADDIKUNTA SIDDHARTHA SHASHANK RATNOO NARENDRA KUMAR SHAH SHREERANJANI K SAGAR CHOURASIA & ANR RAHUL KUMAR GAGAN B G ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr.Vikram Hegde, Mr. Prateek Chadha & Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advocates W.P.(C) 3073/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 1. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Devik Singh, Advocates for respondent-UPSC Mr. R. Sathish and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent-NCBC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL G...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2018

North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.vikram Bhagat

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :22. d March, 2018 RFA4322017 & CM No.15977/2017 (stay), 15979/2017 (delay) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. .... Appellants Through : Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent VIKRAM BHAGAT CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through : Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2018

Priknit Retails Ltd. & Ors. Vs.aneja Agencies

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. 03.2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 374/2016 & IA No.9569/2016 % + PRIKNIT RETAILS LTD. & ORS. .....Petitioners Versus ANEJA AGENCIES ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the Respondent : Mr Kamal Gupta, Mr Neeraj Gupta and : Mr Anirudh Kanav, Advocates. : Mr R. G. Srivastava with Mr. D. K. : Goswami, Advocates. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an arbitral award dated 20.03.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) passed by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of three arbitrators (Panel No.1 of Delhi Hindustani Mercantile Association hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal).2. By the impugned award, the Arbitral Tribunal has awarded a sum of 1,72,63,398/- along with pendente lite interest and future interest at the rate of 15% per annum. ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2018

East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.kapil Kumar Puri

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h February, 2018 Date of decision:22. d March, 2018 RFA5602017 EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. .... Appellant Through: Mr. G.D. Mishra, Standing Counsel. (M:88008. 1485) versus ..... Respondent Through: None. KAPIL KUMAR PURI CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 These are a batch of appeals which have arisen out of disputes between Contractors/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Contractors) on the one hand and the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC) and East Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, EDMC), on the other. NrDMC and EDMC are collectively referred to as `Corporations'. The facts in each appeal are different and hence separate judgements are being passed in each of the appeals.2. Briefly, these are cases where various work orders were placed on Contractors by both the Corporations. The works were executed by the Contractors and thereafter, the Engineer-in-Charge has pa...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2018

G S Sodhi vs.ntpc Ltd & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2018

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order : March 22, 2018 W.P.(C) 2797/2018 & CM Nos.11310-11/2018 Through: Mr.Arun K.Sinha, Advocate ........ Petitioner G S SODHI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR NTPC LTD & ANR versus Through: Mr.Adarsh Tripathi, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) By way of this petition, a mandamus is sought to first respondent to 1. pay post-retiral benefits including pension and commuted value of pension to petitioner as per Self-contributory Superannuation Benefits (Pension) Scheme, 1995 with effect from 1st July, 2013 alongwith interest and also to pay adequate compensation to petitioner on account of non-payment of post- retiral benefits to him from July, 2013.2. For the relief claimed in this petition, petitioner has not approached the respondents. Let petitioner do so by way of a representation. Mr.Arun K.Sinha, Advocate submits on behalf of petitioner that Representation has to be made to second respondent.3. In the facts ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2018