Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 21 of about 598 results (0.022 seconds)Avinash Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + AVINASH KUMAR STATE + KULDEEP SINGH STATE + SAHENSHER PAL CRL.A. 74/2001 Reserved on: November 16, 2017 Date of decision: December 14, 2017 Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 88/2001 Through: Mr Shishir Mathur, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 89/2001 Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma with Ms. Prachee Satija, and Mr. Prakarsh Airyan,Advocate. ...Appellant Crl. Appeal No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 1 of 50 STATE + SUSHIL KUMAR versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 91/2001 Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 106/2001 ...Appellant Through: Ms. Sunita Kapil with Ms. Pooja Soami, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTAnd STATE + RAMESH CHAND STATE + CHOTTEY LAL CRL.A. 118/2...
Tag this Judgment!Ev Motors India Private Limited vs.anurag Agarwal and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.671/2017 + % EV MOTORS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ashim Sood and Ms. Payal 14th December, 2017 ANURAG AGARWAL AND ANR. versus Chandra, Advocates. ..... Defendants CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) IA No.14900/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. I.A. stands disposed of. CS(OS) No.671/2017 and IA No.14899/2017 (Order XXXIX Rules 1 &2) 1. This suit seeking reliefs of injunction, damages and rendition of accounts is filed by the plaintiff company against two defendants. Defendant no.1 in the suit is the Ex-Director of the plaintiff company. Defendant no.2 is the company of which defendant CS(OS) No.671/2017 Page 1 of 23 no.1 is the Principal Promoter. As per the suit plaint the following reliefs are prayed:-"In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Plaintiff most humbly prays that this Honble Court may ...
Tag this Judgment!Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.khem Chand & Ors
Court: Delhi
* (1) (2) (3) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 14, 2017 + + + MAC.APP. 1022/2015 & CM326132015 MAC.APP. 1023/2015 & CM326152015 MAC.APP. 1028/2015 & CM326702015 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Gariam Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates versus (1) BALA DEVI & ORS (2) KHEM CHAND & ORS (3) RAM SAHAI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shyam Singh Sisodia, Advocate for respondents-claimants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned three appeals arise out of a vehicular accident 1. which took place on 22nd December, 2012 and in this accident, Rajan Pal Singh @ Khajan Singh, Kamlesh and Balbir @ Billu had died. Vide impugned Award of 1st October, 2015, learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) has granted compensation of `13,12,574/-, `15,73,718/- and `17,35,564/- alongwith interest @ 12% per annum to MAC...
Tag this Judgment!Kuldeep Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + AVINASH KUMAR STATE + KULDEEP SINGH STATE + SAHENSHER PAL CRL.A. 74/2001 Reserved on: November 16, 2017 Date of decision: December 14, 2017 Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 88/2001 Through: Mr Shishir Mathur, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 89/2001 Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma with Ms. Prachee Satija, and Mr. Prakarsh Airyan,Advocate. ...Appellant Crl. Appeal No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 1 of 50 STATE + SUSHIL KUMAR versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 91/2001 Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 106/2001 ...Appellant Through: Ms. Sunita Kapil with Ms. Pooja Soami, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTAnd STATE + RAMESH CHAND STATE + CHOTTEY LAL CRL.A. 118/2...
Tag this Judgment!Tapas Kumar Datta vs.the Appellate Authority and Chairman, Steel Autho ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:21. 11.2017 Judgment Pronounced on:14. 12.2017 RFA7432016 & C.M.No.35138/2016 Through: Mr.S.S Ahluwalia and Mr. Jatin ... Appellant/Plaintiff TAPAS KUMAR DATTA Teotia, Advocates. versus THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY AND CHAIRMAN, STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS Respondents/Defendant Through: Mr. Dig Vijay Rai and Mr. Pulkit Tyagi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. The appellant has challenged the impugned judgment and decree dated 09.06.2016 in CS No.371/by which the appellants suit was dismissed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge-16, Central District, Tis Hazari, Delhi.2. This case has a long and tumultuous history. The appeal before this Court has reached after having gone through multiple forums. The controversy in the present case started when the appellant married with Smt.Nivedita Dutta on 10.12.1982 in Kolkata. On 09.03.1985 the appellants wife succumbed to burn RFA No....
Tag this Judgment!M/S Samar Polytex Pvt Ltd vs.brij Mohan Gupta
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:14. h December, 2017 + CM(M) 390/2015, CMs No.8033/2015, 26607/2015 Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioner BRIJ MOHAN GUPTA versus M/S SAMAR POLYTEX PVT LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.S. Kela, Advocate 1. The petition at hand challenges the order dated 12th February, 2015 of the Court of Civil Judge whereby the application of the petitioner under Section 151 read with Section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) registered as M.No.28/2014 was dismissed.2. It is necessary to trace the backdrop of these proceedings, albeit briefly. The respondent had instituted a civil suit against the petitioner seeking money decree in the sum of Rs.1,55,000/-. The petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) was admittedly summoned in the said suit of the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) and appeared in response to the summons and fil...
Tag this Judgment!Inderpal @ Mandhu vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d November, 2017 Pronounced on: December 14, 2017 CRL.A. 1526/2014 INDERPAL @ MANDHU ...Appellant Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohiya, Mr. Anshul Duggal, Mr. Prem Chettri and Mr. Rajiv, Advocates STATE versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State... RESPONDENTCORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J JUDGMENT1412.2017 1. This is an appeal directed against the impugned judgment dated 18th July 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.arising out of the FIR No.45/12, registered at Police Station (PS) J.P. Kalan, convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 302 Indian Penal Code (IPC) and under Section 201 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The appeal also challenges the order on sentence dated 6th August 2014 whereby, for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, the Appellan...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Alagh vs.shivraj Puri & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SUNIL ALAGH SHIVRAJ PURI & ANR. CS(COMM) No.1495/2016 14th December, 2017 Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Mr. Sahil Garg Pandey, ..... Appellant and Mr. Anupam Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Faheem Shah, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) OA No.138/2017 1. This chamber appeal has been preferred by the defendant no.1 in the suit impugning the order of the Joint Registrar dated 14.09.2017 by which Joint Registrar has struck off the written statement filed by defendant no.1 by holding that the same has been filed beyond the statutory period of 120 days, provided under the relevant provision of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015. It has been held by the CS(COMM) No.1495/2016 Page 1 of 6 Joint Registrar that the right of defendant no.1 to file written statement stood closed on exp...
Tag this Judgment!Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.ram Sahai & Ors
Court: Delhi
* (1) (2) (3) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 14, 2017 + + + MAC.APP. 1022/2015 & CM326132015 MAC.APP. 1023/2015 & CM326152015 MAC.APP. 1028/2015 & CM326702015 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Gariam Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates versus (1) BALA DEVI & ORS (2) KHEM CHAND & ORS (3) RAM SAHAI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shyam Singh Sisodia, Advocate for respondents-claimants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned three appeals arise out of a vehicular accident 1. which took place on 22nd December, 2012 and in this accident, Rajan Pal Singh @ Khajan Singh, Kamlesh and Balbir @ Billu had died. Vide impugned Award of 1st October, 2015, learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) has granted compensation of `13,12,574/-, `15,73,718/- and `17,35,564/- alongwith interest @ 12% per annum to MAC...
Tag this Judgment!Sushil Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + AVINASH KUMAR STATE + KULDEEP SINGH STATE + SAHENSHER PAL CRL.A. 74/2001 Reserved on: November 16, 2017 Date of decision: December 14, 2017 Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 88/2001 Through: Mr Shishir Mathur, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 89/2001 Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma with Ms. Prachee Satija, and Mr. Prakarsh Airyan,Advocate. ...Appellant Crl. Appeal No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 1 of 50 STATE + SUSHIL KUMAR versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 91/2001 Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 106/2001 ...Appellant Through: Ms. Sunita Kapil with Ms. Pooja Soami, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTAnd STATE + RAMESH CHAND STATE + CHOTTEY LAL CRL.A. 118/2...
Tag this Judgment!