Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 23 of about 598 results (0.019 seconds)Mukesh Yadav vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) No.6062/2017 MUKESH YADAV ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Anil Singal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Mr.Jagjit Singh, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HIMA KOHLI, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 11th May, 2017, passed by the Railway Board, Ministry of Railways, Government of India, wherein he was declared unfit for Government service and discharged from the post of Constable in the RPF/RPSF with immediate effect. The reasons for passing the discharge order were that the petitioner had deliberately omitted to furnish vital information with regard to a criminal case against him which was pending trial at the time when he had filled up the attestation form, after being selected to the subject post on clearing the written examination and interview.2. Mr.Singal, learned counsel for the petitioner ...
Tag this Judgment!Manju Devi vs.manju Devi
Court: Delhi
* + % MANJU DEVI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.1026/2017 Reserved on:6. h December, 2017 Pronounced on:13. h December, 2017 Through: Mr. ..... Appellant Shiv Kumar Kohli, Advocate with Mr. Praveen Gupta, Advocate. versus PREMJIT KAUR ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. Appl. No.44438/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.44435/2017 and 44437/2017 (for delays) These are applications seeking condonation of delay of 781 days in filing the appeal and 28 days in filing the appeal. Though there is no reason to condone the huge delay because the only ground for seeking condonation that the counsel did RFA No.1026/2017 Page 1 of 8 not file the appeal is not believable, yet, since the appellant has been heard on merits of the appeal, hence only delay is condoned. C.Ms. stand disposed of. RFA No.1026/2017 and C.M. Appl. N...
Tag this Judgment!Deepak Kumar Gupta vs.university of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:06.12.2017 Judgment delivered on:13.12.2017 + W.P.(C) 8538/2015 and CM Nos. 18385/2015 & 33995/2017 DEEPAK KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Anurag Ojha, Mr Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Mr Lal Babu Lalit and Mr Sanjay Baniwal, Advs. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS Through: Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms Slomita Rai, Advs for DU. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. The petitioner is a student of Ph.D w.e.f. 01.06.2012 working with the Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi. His guide was Ajay Verma, (an Assistant Professor).2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 20.03.2015 (received by him on 01.04.2015) issued by respondents No.1 & 2 wherein the petitioners candidature to the Ph. D. course was cancelled. This was for an alleged violation of Ordinance VI B of the respondent university. No prior notice or a show cause had been issued to the pet...
Tag this Judgment!Phool Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h December, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 10400/2015 PHOOL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Kaushik, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Siddharth Panda, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Mr. Hem Kumar, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, present petition is set down for final hearing and disposal. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the 1/3rd share of the petitioner in the land comprised in Khasra No.29/1(1-12), 18 (05-16) total area measuring 7 bighas and 8 biswas, situated in the revenue of Village Saidabad, Tehsil- Mehrauli, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as subject land), are deemed to have lapsed in view of the p...
Tag this Judgment!Regen Powertech Private Limited vs.green Infra Wind Farm Assets Limite ...
Court: Delhi
$~26 to 29 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision :13. h December, 2017 + FAO(OS) 312/2017, CAV No.1067/2017 & CM Nos.45193- 94/2017 REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus SEMBCORP GREEN INFRA LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. FAO(OS) 313/2017, CAV No.1066/2017 & CM Nos.45195- 96/2017 REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus SEMBCORP GREEN INFRA LIMTED &ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. + FAO(OS)Nos312-317/2017 Page 1 of 4 + FAO(OS) 314/2017, CAV No.1069/2017 & CM Nos.45245- 46/2017 + REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus GREEN INFRA WIND FARM ASSETS LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, S...
Tag this Judgment!Suresh Gupta vs.hari Kishan Madan & Anr
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:13. 12.2017 RFA No.631/2016 SURESH GUPTA ..... Appellant/plaintiff. Through: Mr. Aditya Kala, Adv. with Mr.Satish Kumar, Adv. versus HARI KISHAN MADAN & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS/Defendant/counter-claimant. Through: Mr. Atul Bandhu, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. Challenge in this Regular First Appeal is the judgment and decree dated 30th July, 2016 passed by learned Additional District Judge, West District, Tis Hazari, Delhi whereby the suit of the appellant was dismissed and that of the counter claim of the respondents was decreed in respect of property bearing no.261A measuring 190 square yards consisting of Khasra no.5/25, Sainik Enclave, New Delhi.2. The appellant filed suit for a Permanent Injunction claiming to be the absolute owner of plot bearing no.261A area measuring 190 (46 x 37) square yards consisting of Khasra no.5/25, Sainik Enclave, New Delhi. He claimed that he had purchas...
Tag this Judgment!Ifci Factors Limited vs.gangotri Iron & Steel Co. Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h December, 2017. CS(COMM) 1579/2016 IFCI FACTORS LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava, Ms. Shreya Mehta and Mr. Arjun Saxena, Advs. Versus GANGOTRI IRON & STEEL CO. LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Pawan and Mr. Akshat Srivastava, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 On 23rd November, 2017, the following order was passed in this suit: for 1908 (CPC) 1. This suit, filed under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, of Rs.16,80,42,022.88/- jointly and severally from the four defendants, namely, Gangotri Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., Mr.Sanjiv Choudhary, Mr.Ankit Choudhary and M/s Gangotri Electrocasting Limited was entertained under Order XXXVII of the CPC and summons for appearance ordered to be issued to the defendants. recovery The order dated 11th October, 2017 records that the 2. defendants had not entered appearance and the plaintiff was thus entitled to a decree under Or...
Tag this Judgment!Dabur India Ltd vs.pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-Iii
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA11422017 & CM No.45221/2017 DABUR INDIA LTD ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:13. 12.2017 Through: Mr. M.P. Rastogi with Mr. K.N. Ahuja, Advs. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Through: Standing Counsel with Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The assessee in its appeal under Section 260A urges that the findings of the lower authorities affirmed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) are erroneous. It is urged specifically that the attribution of an international transaction, is premised upon the existence of one under Section 92B, calling for adjustment under Section 92C and in the present case, in fact, there was no such transaction; furthermore it is contended that in the absence of any comparable transaction between ITA No.1142/2017 Page 1 unrelated t...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Hospitech Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs.the Engineer-In-Chie ...
Court: Delhi
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10765/2017 & CM No.44109/2017 M/S HOSPITECH MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. Through: Mr P. S. Bindra, Ms Rishika Arora ........ Petitioner and Ms Savi Abbot, Advocates. versus THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEFS BRANCH FOR MES WORKS, E2 (DESIGN) INTEGRATED HQ OF MOD (ARMY) Through: Mr Arjun Mitra, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1312.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:-"(i) CERTIORARI for removing the... Petitioners name from consolidated list of banned enlisted consultants for MES work issued by Lt. Col. Offg. Dir (DES) of Respondent in which... Petitioners name is mentioned at Serial No.3 and also for Quashing purported Banning Order dated 30.12.2014 (Copy whereof has never been given to the... Petitioner) referred to in aforesaid list. (ii) Grant such other, further relief the facts and circumstances of the case as this Honble Court may...
Tag this Judgment!Regen Powertech Private Limited vs.sembcorp Green Infra Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~26 to 29 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision :13. h December, 2017 + FAO(OS) 312/2017, CAV No.1067/2017 & CM Nos.45193- 94/2017 REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus SEMBCORP GREEN INFRA LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. FAO(OS) 313/2017, CAV No.1066/2017 & CM Nos.45195- 96/2017 REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus SEMBCORP GREEN INFRA LIMTED &ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. + FAO(OS)Nos312-317/2017 Page 1 of 4 + FAO(OS) 314/2017, CAV No.1069/2017 & CM Nos.45245- 46/2017 + REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus GREEN INFRA WIND FARM ASSETS LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, S...
Tag this Judgment!