Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 25 of about 598 results (0.019 seconds)Mr. Gautam Gambhir vs.d.a.p & Co. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : OCTOBER27 2017 DECIDED ON : DECEMBER13 2017 + CS(COMM) 395/2017, IA No.84(u/O VII R11CPC) & IA No.67(u/O XXXIX R12 CPC) MR. GAUTAM GAMBHIR ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Rajeev Nayyar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Manik Dogra, Ms.Sonali Jaitley Bakhshi, Mr.Jaiyesh Bakshi, Mr.Anshul Gupta, Mr.P.Singhai, Ms.Aastha Lumba & Mr.Saurabh Seth, Advocates. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG D.A.P & CO. & ANR. ..... Defendants Through : Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocate with Mr.Kunal Anand, Advocate. S.P GARG, J.1. During the course of arguments in IA No.67under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC, it was agreed that the matter may finally be disposed of as no evidence is required to be led by any party. Consequently, arguments on merits were heard and the matter was listed for final disposal. CS COMM) 395/2017 Page 1 of 8 2. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff Gautam Gambhir for temporary and permanent injunction and damages etc. against the defen...
Tag this Judgment!Paritosh Sharma vs.uti Infrastructure Technology and Services Limited ...
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 13, 2017 W.P.(C) 11053/2017 & C.M.45217/2017 PARITOSH SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Preeti Singh, Ms. Swati Jindal and Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocates versus UTI INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY AND SERVICES LIMITED AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Eshita Baruah, Advocate for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC for respondent-UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In this petition, quashing of Office Order No./3/2016-17; Office Order No./4/2016-17; Office Order No./6/2016-17 to /36/2016-17 of 22nd April, 2016 and Office Order No.67/2016-2017 of 21st July, 2016, is sought by petitioner, who is aggrieved by denial of promotion from the post of Assistant Vice President to Deputy Vice President. The grievance of petitioner is that in spite of his seniority and performance, he has not been promoted. Vide Communication of 13th February, 2017 (Annexure P-7 colly.) it was conveyed to petitioner that promotion in...
Tag this Judgment!Jyoti Devi vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~47 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:13. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 11431/2016 JYOTI DEVI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anukriti Pareek and Mr.Rahul versus Singhal, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms.K.Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr.Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for GNCTD and LAC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner. The petitioner prays that the acquisition proceedings in respect of land comprised in Khasra No.62and 63total area admeasuring 100 sq. yds, share of the petitioner being 40 sq. yds., situated in revenue estate of village Roshanpura, Tehsil & District Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) be declared as having been l...
Tag this Judgment!Makemytrip (India) Private Limited vs.orbit Corporate Leisure Travels ...
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h October, 2017 Decided on:13. h December, 2017 CS(COMM) 643/2017 MAKEMYTRIP (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED .... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. J.Sai Deepak, Mr. Bharadwaj Jaishankar, Mr. Ashutosh Nagar, Mr. Abhishek Kotnala, Mr. Deepankar Mishra, Mr. Ayush, Ms. Sangeeta Goel, Mr. Mohit Goel, Mr. Sidhant, Advs. versus ORBIT CORPORATE LEISURE TRAVELS (I) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. A.S. Chandiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sudeep Chatterjee, Ms. Jaya Mandelia, Ms. Sonal Chhablani, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA IA112252017 (u/O XXXIX R12 CPC) and IA118712017 (u/O XXXIX R4CPC) 1. MakeMyTrip (India) Pvt. Ltd. (in short MakeMyTrip) has filed the present suit inter-alia praying for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their franchisees, affiliates, subsidiaries, licencees and agents in any manner using the trademark GETMYTRIP infringing the plaintiffs trademark MakeMyTrip, its domain n...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and Ors vs.mrs. Sarita Kapoor
Court: Delhi
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11008/2017 & CM Nos.45004/2017 (for stay), 45005/2017 (for exemption) 1. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus MRS. SARITA KAPOOR Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI ORDER1312.2017 % The petitioner/Chief Controller of Accounts is aggrieved by the judgment dated 27.03.2017, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi on an Original Application No.3478/2016 filed by the respondent praying inter alia for directions to consider her for absorption to the post of Accountant, at par with other similarly situated persons who have been duly absorbed by them.2. The facts of the case, as culled out from the records, are that the petitioners had issued an advertisement on 17.09.2011, inviting applications for filling up vacancies in the cadre of Accountants on deputation basis. The said adver...
Tag this Judgment!Preetinder Singh Thapar vs.hardeep Singh Thapar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.716/2017 + % PREETINDER SINGH THAPAR13h December, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Arora, Advocate with Ms. Radhika Pahadia, Advocate. versus HARDEEP SINGH THAPAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Prashant Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Vikram Pradeep, Advocate for respondent no.4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.45105/2017 (under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC filed by the appellant) 1. By this application, the appellant informs that appellant has expired and it is prayed that the legal heirs of the appellant be brought on record. Accordingly, the legal heirs of the appellant are brought on record for the purpose of this appeal as also the suit inasmuch as in a suit such as the present, and as detailed hereinafter, right to sue will survive on the death of the appellant. Of course, these RFA No.716/2017 Page 1 of 15 observations are made without pre...
Tag this Judgment!Hitender Kumar Mehta vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Date of Decision:13. 12.2017 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA3742016 & CM No.22224/2016 HITENDER KUMAR MEHTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.K. Mittal and Mr. Rajeev Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC and Mr. Srivats Kaushal, Adv. for UOI. Mr. R.D. Makheeja, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Desh Ratan Nigam, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant claims to be aggrieved by an order of the Single Judge who affirmed the findings of the Election Tribunal established under Section 10B of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980. The grievance articulated in the writ proceeding was that the respondent a successful candidate for the membership of the Council (Central Council of the Institute) had secured his registration as Fellow Member contrary to the regulation and had therefore acted in an arbitrary manner disentitling him to offer ca...
Tag this Judgment!Micromax Informatics Ltd vs.vijay Jain & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 310/2017 Date of Decision:13. h December, 2017 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta with Ms. Snigdha Sharma, Ms. Ritwik Sneha and Mr. Shaurya Kuthiala, Advs. versus VIJAY JAIN & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Archana Sahadeva, Mr. Nikhil Lal and Mr. R. Behl, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM Nos.45022-23/2017 (for exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 310/2017 Page 1 of 9 CMs stand disposed of. FAO(OS) No.310/2017 1. The appellant before us (defendant in suit) assails the order dated 15th November, 2017 passed in CS(OS) No.1831/2015 & CC No.102/2015 whereby the ld. Single Judge has directed both the parties to the suit to file their evidences by way of affidavits simultaneously within a further period of four weeks therefrom.2. The primary ground o...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Ii vs.welspring Universal
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CEAC82017 & CM No.15296/2017 Date of decision:13. h December, 2017 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI II Through: Mr.Sanjeev Narula, Sr.Standing Counsel ........ Petitioner (Customs, CBEC) with Mr.Abhishek Ghai and Ms.Anumita Chandra, Advocates. versus WELSPRING UNIVERSAL ..... Respondent Through: Dr.Prabhat Kumar and Mr.Arjun Malik, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 impugns the order dated 19th September, 2016 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Excise Appeal No.1773/2010 in the case of Wellspring Universal.2. The respondent-assessee is a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in the manufacture and exports of hand tools, welding machine and CEAC No.8 /2017 Page 1 of 6 safety products.3. Two show cause notices dated 26th Sep...
Tag this Judgment!Bigtree Entertainment Pvt Ltd vs.brain Seed Sportainment Pvt Ltd & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t November, 2017 Decided on:13. h December, 2017 CS(COMM) 327/2016 BIGTREE ENTERTAINMENT PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Ms. Rupali Samuel, Ms. Surya Rajappan, Mr. Akshay Vaddagiri, Advs. versus BRAIN SEED SPORTAINMENT PVT LTD & ANR. .... Defendant Represented by: Mr. M.K. Miglani, Mr. Nitin Thukral, Mr. Aayushmann Gauba, Mr. Galav Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA IA44622016 (u/O XXXIX R12 CPC) and IA60542016 (u/O XXXIX R4CPC by defendants) 1. Bigtree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, in the present suit inter alia seeks permanent injunction against the defendant, its partners, proprietors, or as the case may be, assignees in business franchisees licensees, distributors, dealers and agents from in any manner using the mark BOOKMYSPORTS, or using the prefix BOOKMY.2. As per the plaint, plaintiff company was established in 1999. Thr...
Tag this Judgment!