Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 17 of about 598 results (0.020 seconds)Air India Ltd vs.capt a K Dewan & Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved On Judgment pronounced On :17. 11.20 18.12.2017 LPA6942017 & C.M. No.38734-38735/2017 AIR INDIA LTD Versus CAPT SURESH KUMAR & ANR LPA6962017 & C.M. No.38741-38742/2017 AIR INDIA LTD Versus CAPT A K DEWAN & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS :Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra, Ms. Bhavna Dhami and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeals essentially seek quashing of the common judgment and order dated 22nd March, 2017 passed in W.P.(C) No.780/2004 titled as Capt. Suresh Kumar vs. Union of India & Anr. and W.P.(C) No.13357/2004 titled as Capt. A.K. Dewan vs. Indian Airlines Limited, LPA Nos. 694/2017 & 696/2017 Page 1 of 10 whereby, whilst allowing the...
Tag this Judgment!Deepu vs.state
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.APPl. No.246/2016 DEEPU STATE Reserved on:25. 11.2017 Date of Decision :16. 12.2017 .....Appellant Through Ms.Saahila Lamba, Adv. DHCLSC Versus ... Respondent Through Mr.Amit Gupta, APP with Insp. Rajender Singh P.S. Mayur Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant Deepu challenging his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Section 25 of the Arms Act vide order dated 26th March, 2015 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, (FTC) E-Court, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.29/2012. The appellant further challenges the order dated 26th March, 2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge sentencing him with life imprisonment and with fine of Rs.10,000/- under Section 302 IPC and 3 years RI with fine of Rs.5,000/- under Section 25 of the Arms Act. Crl.A. 246/2016 Page 1 2. The case of...
Tag this Judgment!Manish @ Lulu vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* % + STATE + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h November, 2017 Decided on:16. h December, 2017 CRL.A. 881/2013 SHIVA @ UWAN & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey and Ms. Namita Wali, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with Inspector Yogesh Tyagi, PS Paharganj. CRL.A. 1145/2012 MANISH @ LULU ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with Inspector Yogesh Tyagi, PS Paharganj. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 Appellants Shiva @ Uwan, Vicky and Surjeet all sons of Niranjan in Crl. Appeal No.881/2013 and Manish @ Lulu son of Shyam Singh in Crl. Appeal No.1145/2012 challenge their conviction for offences punishable under Sections 302/307/324/323/4IPC and the order on sentence dated 28th May, 2012 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment...
Tag this Judgment!Janak vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2017 + JANAK CRL.A. 510/2014 Through : Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. ..... Appellant Versus STATE Through : Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP. SI Narender, PS Kanjhawala. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR S.P.GARG, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Present appeal has been filed by Janak (hereinafter the appellant) to impugn a judgment dated 25.02.2014 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.89/2012 arising out of FIR No.176/2012 PS Kanjhawala whereby he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) IPC. By an order dated 03.03.2014, he was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with fine `10,000/-; default sentence being SI for six months.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the charge-sheet was that on 21.08.2012 at around 05.30 p.m. when PW-4 (Manoj Kumar) was present near House No.G-319, JJ Colony, Sawda, Delhi, he saw a crowd. On ...
Tag this Judgment!Shiva @ Uwan & Ors. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
* % + STATE + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h November, 2017 Decided on:16. h December, 2017 CRL.A. 881/2013 SHIVA @ UWAN & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey and Ms. Namita Wali, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with Inspector Yogesh Tyagi, PS Paharganj. CRL.A. 1145/2012 MANISH @ LULU ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with Inspector Yogesh Tyagi, PS Paharganj. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 Appellants Shiva @ Uwan, Vicky and Surjeet all sons of Niranjan in Crl. Appeal No.881/2013 and Manish @ Lulu son of Shyam Singh in Crl. Appeal No.1145/2012 challenge their conviction for offences punishable under Sections 302/307/324/323/4IPC and the order on sentence dated 28th May, 2012 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I vs.m/s Russian Technology Centr ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI1820 Judgement delivered on:15. 12.2016 ITA Nos.547, 549 & 555/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-I .....Appellant Through: Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advocate. Versus M/S RUSSIAN TECHNOLOGY CENTRE (P) LTD......... RESPONDENTS 21-26 ITA Nos.596, 597, 598, 599, 600 & 601/2015 Through: Mr. Rudra Kahlon, Advocate. PR. CIT ....Appellant Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri and Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocates. Versus CLARIDGES HOTELS (P) LTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aryama Sundaram, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur and Mr. Ajay Wadhwa, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.:-"1. These appeals have been preferred by the Revenue under Section 260- A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act) against the common order dated 12.04.2013 passed in ITA Nos. 4932,4933, 5390 & 5391/Del/2011 and the common order dated 30....
Tag this Judgment!Vikas & Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~18. * + W.P.(C) 7382/2017 and CM APPL. 30476/2017, 30479/2017 VIKAS & ORS Through: Mr. Manoj Gorkela, Dr. Alok and Mr. Rajnish Singh, Advocates ........ Petitioners 1. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sumit Batra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3/GNCTD. Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-4 to R-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % This petition has been filed by four petitioners praying inter alia for ORDER1512.2017 issuing directions to the respondent No.3/DSSSB to conduct a re- examination in respect of the posts of Grade-II (DASS).2. Counsel for the petitioners states that all the four petitioners had participated in the subject examination conducted by the respondent No.3/DSSSB on 22.08.2015 and were unsuccessful therein. Subsequently, on 15.03.2016, the entire selection process was cancelled by the DSSSB.3. We are of the view that the petitioners do not have any locus standi t...
Tag this Judgment!Saurabh Gupta & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2316/2017 % Date of Decision:15. h December, 2017 SAURABH GUPTA & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam Tripathi, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Bharathi Rahu, CGSC for R-1 to 4. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for R-6 to 8. Mr. Pravesh Thakur, Adv. for R-9. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.38183/2017 For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 is condoned. The counter affidavit be taken on record. CM stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.2316/2017 1. This writ petition is an important issue regarding illegal transportation of cattle, which is in violation of the Rules 47 to 56 of the Transport of Animals Rules, 1978. These Rules have been W.P.(C) No.2316/2017 Page 1 of 5 enacted in exercise of powers conferred under Section 38 of the Preve...
Tag this Judgment!Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp & Anr vs.vinod Jadhav & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~OS-9 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. 12.2017 CS(OS) 3132/2014, CC712015, I.A. 20105/2014 and I.A.14072/2015 MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Pravin Anand, Mr.Tusha Malhotra and Ms.Udita M.Patro, Advs. versus VINOD JADHAV & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Aditya Kumar, proxy counsel for Mr.Vinod Jadhav, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) I.A. 20105/2014 1. This application is filed by the plaintiffs under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC seeking an ex parte ad interim injunction against the defendants so as to restrain the defendants from infringing the registered patent in respect to SITAGLIPTIN.2. Brief facts of this application are that the plaintiffs are the registered patentee for drug SITAGLIPTIN having an Indian Patent No.209816. The said drug was approved for sale in the Indian Market on 28.03.2008. Thereafter Plaintiff No.1 is selling the said drug in India under the trademark JANUVIA and J...
Tag this Judgment!Anita Aghi & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~54 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA No.793/2017 ANITA AGHI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Seema Bengani, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER1512.2017 1. The present appeal has been placed before us at 5.00 PM on an urgent mentioning being allowed.2. The three appellants herein, occupants of shops No.53, 26 and 52, situated at ISBT Kashmiri Gate) are aggrieved by the common judgment dated 04.12.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in two connected petitions [W.P.(C) Nos. 6335/2016 and 12247/2016]. whereunder, a challenge was laid by them to the communications dated 18.7.2016 and 19.7.2016, issued by the respondent No.2/DTIDC, calling upon them to vacate the said shops/kiosks. LPA7932017 Page 1 of 3 3. Arguments on merits have been addressed by the learned counsel for the appellants for some time. We have indicated to her that we are not in...
Tag this Judgment!