Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 16 of about 598 results (0.009 seconds)S J vs.s P
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:22. 11.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:18. 12.2017 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 150/2017 & CM Nos.30836/2017 & 30837/2017 S J S P versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr. Sunil Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Grover and Ms. Seema Seth, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Kunal Seth and Ms. Jahnvi Dubey, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 impugns an order dated 19.08.2017, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in HMA No.1601/2014 (hereinafter referred to as the subject petition), whereby, the right of the appellant-wife to further cross examine the respondent-husband was closed. MAT.APP. (F.C.) 150/2017 Page 1 of 24 2. The facts as are necessary for the e...
Tag this Judgment!r.s. Gautam & Ors. Vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.1023/2017 Reserved on:13. h December, 2017 Pronounced on:18. h December, 2017 % R.S. GAUTAM & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Keshav Dayal, Senior J.N. Advocate with Mr. Aggarwal, Advocate. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Advocate for DDA. Mr. Rajesh Dagar, Advocate with Mr. Swastik Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.44052/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.1023/2017 and C.M. Nos.44050/2017 44051/2017 (directions) (stay) and 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiffs in the suit RFA No.1023/2017 Page 1 of 27 impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 1.9.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for declaration an...
Tag this Judgment!Tuntun Kumar vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RESERVED ON :23. d NOVEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :18. h DECEMBER, 2017. FAO782015 TUNTUN KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Navneet Goyal with Ms.Kavita Tyagi, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Shipra Shukla, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P GARG, J.CM No.4757/2015 (Delay) For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO782015 1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Tuntun Kumar under Section 23 of the Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (hereinafter the Tribunal) to challenge the legality and correctness of FAO782015 Page 1 of 4 an order dated 20.03.2014 whereby the claim petition to award compensation was dismissed.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. On 19.06.2012 while travelling along with his brother Dharmender on Garhwal Express from Chanderpur Siau to ...
Tag this Judgment!smt.bulbul vs.state
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.A.No.573/2001 Judgment reserved on :24. h October, 2017 Date of decision :18. h December, 2017 SMT.BULBUL STATE Through: Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Advocate versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with SI Prakash Chand, PS Kotwali. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The present appeal was filed by the appellant Smt.Bulbul W/o Sh. Raju against the impugned judgment dated 29.5.2001 of the then learned Additional Sessions Judge, Special Court under the NDPS Act, Delhi in Sessions case No.5/2000 in relation to FIR no.628/99, Police Station Kotwali under Section 21 of the NDPS Act, 1985 whereby she was convicted for the proved commission of the offence of possession of 10 grams of Heroin and was thus convicted under Section 21 of the NDPS Act, 1985.2. The appellant has assailed the impugned order on sentence dated 31.5.2001 in the said case whereby she was sentenced to underg...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Vivek Khanna vs.medical Council of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10907/2017 DR. VIVEK KHANNA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr K.G. Sharma, Advocate. versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr T. Singhdev, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Puja Sarkar and Mr Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocates for R-1/MCI. Mr Praveen Khattar, Advocate for R- 2/DMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER1812.2017 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM No.44630/2017 Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.1. 2. W.P.(C) 10907/2017 and CM No.44629/2017 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an 3. order dated 07.11.2017 passed by the Medical Council of India (hereafter MCI) and the order dated 16.03.2017 passed by the Delhi Medical Council (hereafter DMC). By the aforesaid orders (hereafter the impugned orders), the petitioner has been held to be guilty of medical negligence and has been awarded punition of removal of his name from the Stat...
Tag this Judgment!Ved Prakash Goel & Anr vs.s.d.singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 730/2006 Decided on:18. h December, 2017 VED PRAKASH GOEL & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arun Srivastava, Advocate with Mr. Anupam Srivastava, Adv. versus S.D.SINGH & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants were the claimants before the motor accident claims tribunal (the tribunal) in accident claim case (Suit No.582/2003) seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on account of death of their 23 years old bachelor son Mohit Goel, in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 18.03.2003 involving collision between the two vehicles, one a Maruti car bearing registration no.DBA5207(the maruti car) and the other a Qualis car bearing registration No.DL-3CQ-7516 (the qualis car). The deceased was admittedly driving the Maruti car while qualis car was driven by the first respondent, he also statedl...
Tag this Judgment!Kasturi & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11279/2017 1. KASTURI & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.T.D. Yadav, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jagjit Singh & Mr.Preet Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % Both the petitioners claim to be two of the legal heirs of Late Shri ORDER1812.2017 Sugar Singh who was working on the post of Keyman with the respondent- Northern Railway and had died in an accident as long back as on 25.01.1997. Apart from the petitioner No.1, the wife of the late employee and the petitioner No.2, his son, the deceased is survived by two other sons and four daughters.2. Raising a grievance that the respondents had erroneously rejected the request of the petitioner No.2 for his appointment on compassionate grounds, the petitioners elected to approach the Tribunal in the year 2015, by filing OA No.2498/2015, which we may note was after a passage of 18 years fr...
Tag this Judgment!Sarla Gupta vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h December, 2017 TEST.CAS.15/2016 & IAs No.2463/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 13295/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) & 4830/2017 (of R-2 u/S151CPC). SARLA GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jaskaran Singh, Adv. THE STATE & ORS Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav and Ms. Ruchira, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Puneet Gupta and Mr. Sangam Kumar Jha, Advs. for R-6 to 8, 10 & 11. Ms. Chandrani Prasad and Mr. Chirag Mahalwal, Advs. for R-12 to 15. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This order is in continuation of the earlier order dated 13th December, 2017.2. The main counsel Mr. Anil Sharma, for the petitioner, has not appeared today also and Mr. Jaskaran Singh, Advocate who had appeared on 13th December, 2017 appears today also.3. Mr. Jaskaran Singh, Advocate is not even conscious of the query which was made to him on 13th December, 2017 and resultantly has no answer to the same. He only states that the stay s...
Tag this Judgment!Ved Prakash Tyagi and Anr. Vs.land Acquisition Collector and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~39 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:18. h December, 2017 + W.P. (C.)24/2016 VED PRAKASH TYAGI AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Amit Pratap Shaunak and Ms. Anjani Dubey, Advocates versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sachin Nandwani, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Ankit Saini, Advocates for DMRC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Notice was issued in this matter on 05.01.2016. Time was granted to the parties to file the counter affidavits. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the LAC despite final opportunity having been granted on 10.04.2017. Counsel for the petitioners submits that no useful purpose would be achieved in adjourning the matter in view of the categorical stand taken by the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.(for short DMRC), respondent no.3 in its counter affidavit that the land in question...
Tag this Judgment!Anand Rai vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~17 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % ANAND RAI W.P.(C) 6348/2017 Date of decision :18. h December, 2017 Through : Mr. Aditya Bakshi and Mr. Nand Sagar, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. V.S.R. Kirshna and Mr. Subodh Kr. Kaushik, Advs. for R-2/AIIMS, New Delhi Mr. Ankit Khera and Mr. Binay Kr. Pandey, Advs. for R-6/AIIMS, Patna Mrs. Biji Rajesh for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for R-8/AIIMS, Rishikesh Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP- CBI/respondent no.9 with Ms. Kriti Handa, Ms. Hansika Sahoo and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition inter alia prays for directions to the W.P.(C)No.6348/2017 Page 1 of 3 respondents to investigate into the alleged irregularities and illegalities in the conduct of the AIIMS Entrance Examination for admission to the MBBS Course-2017. So far as the prayer for a direction...
Tag this Judgment!