Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 24 of about 598 results (0.009 seconds)Sunil Kumar and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11727/2015 Date of Judgment:13. h December, 2017 SUNIL KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Amrit Pal S.Gambhir and Ms.Monica Saini, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Vijay Joshi, Sr.Panel Counsel for UOI/R-1. Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms.K.Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr.Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for GNCTD and LAC. Mr.Sachin Nawani, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land comprising in Khasra No.2039/1800/169 (0-07), 2036/166/1-2 (0-08), 1725/167 (0-04), 1726/167 (0-08), 2033/166/1-2 (0-08), 2034/166/1-2 (0-08), 2533/1796/167 (0-11) and 2039/1800/169 (0-08), situated in the revenue estate of village Karkardooma, Delhi (hereinafter ref...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Varunveer vs.financial Commissioner, Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:13. 12.2017 + W.P.(C) 574/2017 & CM Nos. 2640/2017 & 28558/2017 versus DR. VARUNVEER FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, DELHI AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS : Mr S.N. Gupta, Advocate. : Mr Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Mr Rhishabh Jetley, Advocate for GNCTD. For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, challenging an order dated 04.11.2016 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by respondent No.1 (hereafter the Financial Commissioner), whereby, the petitioners appeal against an order dated 19.10.2015 passed by respondent No.2 (hereafter the Excise Commissioner) was rejected. By the aforesaid order dated 19.10.2015, the Excise Commissioner had upheld the decision of the Deputy Commissioner, Excise, Entertainment & Luxury Tax for confiscation of the petitioners v...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Rita Banerjee vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 13, 2017 W.P.(C) 8259/2017 DR. RITA BANERJEE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anupam Srivastava and Mr.Dhairya Gupta, Advocates versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY Through: Mr.Kushal Kumar, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL Respondents Executive Councils Resolution of 30th June, 2017 (Annexure-F) and its letter of 14th August, 2017 (Annexure-E) are impugned in this petition by the petitioner, who has not been called for the interview for promotion from Stage-4 Associate Professor category to Stage-5 Professor/equivalent cadres category as mentioned in TableII (A) of Appendix-III, UGC Regulations, 2010.2. It is evident from the Executive Councils Resolution of 30th June, 2017 (Annexure-F) that petitioners case was considered for promotion to Stage-5 but it was deferred for being reconsidered after three months. Instead of considering petitioners case for promotion after th...
Tag this Judgment!Om Prakash vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~48 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:13. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 11463/2016 OM PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anukriti Pareek and Mr.Rahul versus Singhal, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms.K.Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr.Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for GNCTD and LAC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner. The petitioner prays that the acquisition proceedings in respect of land comprised in Khasra No.629, Plot No.19 G/F, total admeasuring 40 square yards, to the extent of share owned by the petitioner situated in revenue estate of village Roshanpura, tehsil and district Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) be declare...
Tag this Judgment!Regen Powertech Private Limited vs.green Infra Wind Energy Assets Limi ...
Court: Delhi
$~26 to 29 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision :13. h December, 2017 + FAO(OS) 312/2017, CAV No.1067/2017 & CM Nos.45193- 94/2017 REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus SEMBCORP GREEN INFRA LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. FAO(OS) 313/2017, CAV No.1066/2017 & CM Nos.45195- 96/2017 REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus SEMBCORP GREEN INFRA LIMTED &ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. + FAO(OS)Nos312-317/2017 Page 1 of 4 + FAO(OS) 314/2017, CAV No.1069/2017 & CM Nos.45245- 46/2017 + REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus GREEN INFRA WIND FARM ASSETS LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, S...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Sajjad Alam vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Another
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:13.12.2017 $~ * % + versus CRL.A.436/2017 Dr. Sajjad Alam ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Asim Naeem, Advocate State of NCT Of Delhi & Another .... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State SI Gopal Singh, P.S.Mehrali. Ms.Maldeep Sidhu, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. The appellant has assailed the judgment passed by MM (South) 05, Saket Courts, New Delhi dated 10.03.2016 vide FIR No.490/2008 by which respondent no.2 was acquitted for the offences under Section 279 & 338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC).2. As per the appellants case, on 04.10.2008 at about 10:30 AM the respondent no.2 was driving his Maruti Swift car bearing registration No.DL-7CH-1399 in a rash and negligent manner near Vipin Malik Farm House, Satwari, Mehrauli on the wrong side of the road which resulted in a collision of his motorcycle bearing registration No.DL-5SS-7568 with respondent...
Tag this Judgment!Ankur vs.directorate of Education and Ors
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 13, 2017 W.P.(C) 11052/2017 & C.MS.45215-16/2017 ANKUR Through: Mr. Kamal Kapoor and Mr. Virendra Rawat, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) and Ms. Deepshikha Goyal, Advocate for respondent-GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner, a Peon with third respondent-School since March, 2008, is aggrieved by Communication of 14th November, 2017 (Annexure-T) of second respondent vide which petitioners appointment as Peon made about nine years ago, has been declared to be illegal as he was appointed without calling for applications and so, impugned Communication stops the Grant-in-Aid for petitioners salary with liberty to third respondent- School to pay petitioners salary from its own funds.2. To assail impugned Communication of 14th November, 2017 (Annexure-T), learned counsel for petitioner submit...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Kamlesh and Kamla vs.s.d.m.c and Anr.
Court: Delhi
% * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 9818/2017, CM No.39973/2017 SMT. KAMLESH AND KAMLA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Awijit Paliwal, Adv. versus S.D.M.C AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Adv. for SDMC with Ms. Vidhi Jain, Adv. Ms. Sweety Singh, Adv. for GNCTD with S.I. Satender and P.S. Kalkaji CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been squatting in the Nehru Place Area for the past two decades. It is further submitted that the case of the petitioner would be covered by the stand taken by the SDMC and as reflected in the order dated 19th September, 2017 passed in the W.P.(C) 6823/2017.2. Learned counsel for the respondents submit on instructions that the case of the petitioner would also be covered by the stand taken by the SDMC, subject to the petitioner fulfilling the terms as ...
Tag this Judgment!Regen Powertech Private Limited vs.sembcorp Green Infra Limted &Ors
Court: Delhi
$~26 to 29 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision :13. h December, 2017 + FAO(OS) 312/2017, CAV No.1067/2017 & CM Nos.45193- 94/2017 REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus SEMBCORP GREEN INFRA LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. FAO(OS) 313/2017, CAV No.1066/2017 & CM Nos.45195- 96/2017 REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus SEMBCORP GREEN INFRA LIMTED &ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. + FAO(OS)Nos312-317/2017 Page 1 of 4 + FAO(OS) 314/2017, CAV No.1069/2017 & CM Nos.45245- 46/2017 + REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv. versus GREEN INFRA WIND FARM ASSETS LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, S...
Tag this Judgment!Eminent Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:13. h December, 2017 + W.P. (C.)11476/2016 EMINENT MARKETING PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mohammad Shariq, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Kou7mudi Kiran Pathak and Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for L&B/LAC. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra no.22//14/1min(2-8), 15//1/1(0-4),16/2(3-18) and W.P. (C) No.11476/2016 Page 1 of 8 17(4-12) measuring 62 bighas 08 biswas, s...
Tag this Judgment!