Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 22 of about 598 results (0.021 seconds)Vijaya Bank vs.ish Kumar Pruthi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h December, 2017 Pronounced on:14. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 9341/2004 & CM APP Nos.8330/2004, 1972/2005 and 6726/2014 % 1 VIJAYA BANK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar with Mr.V. G. Ramanan and Mr.G. K. Singh, Advs. versus ISH KUMAR PRUTHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Siddharth Dutta, Mr.Kumar Dushyant Singh and Mr.Mukul Lather, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT This writ petition challenges an Award, dated 18th March 2004, passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to the learned Tribunal), whereby and whereunder the dismissal, by the petitioner-Bank, of the services of the respondent-workman, has been quashed, and the respondent has been directed to be reinstated with continuity of service, full back wages and all other consequential benefits. WP(C) 9341/2004 Page 1 of 36 2 The respondent, while serving as clerk with the petitioner-...
Tag this Judgment!Mohinder Kumar vs.board of Governors in Super-Session of Medical Counc ...
Court: Delhi
$~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8438/2011 % Date of decision :14. h December, 2017 MOHINDER KUMAR BOARD OF GOVERNORS IN SUPER-SESSION OF ..... Respondent MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through :... Petitioner in person. versus Through : Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Biakthansangi Das and Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Divya Kapur, Adv. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition was filed by the petitioner praying for the following reliefs : to implement To issue directions to Board of Governors, MCI a. (Respondent) installation of Faculty Identification, tracking & Monitoring system Comprising of Software, controller & Biometric Card Reader at all the Medical colleges/institutions (Tag Faculty) approved by the General Body of the Medical Council of India on 18.11.2009 in larger public Interest to track dummy/fake F...
Tag this Judgment!Chottey Lal vs.state
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + AVINASH KUMAR STATE + KULDEEP SINGH STATE + SAHENSHER PAL CRL.A. 74/2001 Reserved on: November 16, 2017 Date of decision: December 14, 2017 Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 88/2001 Through: Mr Shishir Mathur, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 89/2001 Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma with Ms. Prachee Satija, and Mr. Prakarsh Airyan,Advocate. ...Appellant Crl. Appeal No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 1 of 50 STATE + SUSHIL KUMAR versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 91/2001 Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 106/2001 ...Appellant Through: Ms. Sunita Kapil with Ms. Pooja Soami, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTAnd STATE + RAMESH CHAND STATE + CHOTTEY LAL CRL.A. 118/2...
Tag this Judgment!Honshu Buildcon Private Limited vs.north Delhi Municipal Corp. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB. P. 757/2017 Date of decision:14. h December, 2017 HONSHU BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajesh Gupta & Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advs. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORP. & ANR. ....Respondents Through Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Anushruti & Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advs. for NDMC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties under the Letter of Intent dated 17.05.2016.2. The Licence Agreement annexed with the Letter of Intent contains an Arbitration Agreement between the parties, which is reproduced herein below:-"28.2 Arbitration (a) Any Dispute which is not resolved amicably by conciliation, as provided in Clause 28.1, shall ...
Tag this Judgment!Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.bala Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
* (1) (2) (3) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 14, 2017 + + + MAC.APP. 1022/2015 & CM326132015 MAC.APP. 1023/2015 & CM326152015 MAC.APP. 1028/2015 & CM326702015 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Gariam Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates versus (1) BALA DEVI & ORS (2) KHEM CHAND & ORS (3) RAM SAHAI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shyam Singh Sisodia, Advocate for respondents-claimants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned three appeals arise out of a vehicular accident 1. which took place on 22nd December, 2012 and in this accident, Rajan Pal Singh @ Khajan Singh, Kamlesh and Balbir @ Billu had died. Vide impugned Award of 1st October, 2015, learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) has granted compensation of `13,12,574/-, `15,73,718/- and `17,35,564/- alongwith interest @ 12% per annum to MAC...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Chand vs.state
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + AVINASH KUMAR STATE + KULDEEP SINGH STATE + SAHENSHER PAL CRL.A. 74/2001 Reserved on: November 16, 2017 Date of decision: December 14, 2017 Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 88/2001 Through: Mr Shishir Mathur, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 89/2001 Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma with Ms. Prachee Satija, and Mr. Prakarsh Airyan,Advocate. ...Appellant Crl. Appeal No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 1 of 50 STATE + SUSHIL KUMAR versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 91/2001 Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 106/2001 ...Appellant Through: Ms. Sunita Kapil with Ms. Pooja Soami, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTAnd STATE + RAMESH CHAND STATE + CHOTTEY LAL CRL.A. 118/2...
Tag this Judgment!Jagran Prakashan Ltd and Anr. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:14. December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 5606/2016 JAGRAN PRAKASHAN LTD AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. K. Datta and Mr. Ashish versus Verma, Advs. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Mr. Vinod Kumar Pandey, Mr. Sekh Zakir Hussain, Mr. Kunal Awana, Advs. for R-2 to 200 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.(ORAL) CM No.40446/2017 (for preponement of hearing) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not having any objection, in case the present application is allowed.2. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the same is disposed of. W.P.(C) 5606/2016 1.2. On the request of the parties matter is taken up today. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 27.05.2016 passed by respondent No.1, which is a performa party, stating therein that it has on an erroneo...
Tag this Judgment!Purnima Jain vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~32 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:14. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 6886/2016 PURNIMA JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.S.K.Rout and Mr.Aman Mehrotra, versus Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advts. for L&B/LAC. Mr.Sunil Goel, Ms.Supreet Bimbro and Mr.Mayank Goel, Advts. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the built up property admeasuring 55.5 sq. yds. out of Khasra No.1185/20/2/1, property bearing no.346, Gali no.1, Friends Colony Industrial Area, G.T.Road, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of the fact that compensation has not been tendered to the petitioner.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of...
Tag this Judgment!Sahensher Pal vs.state
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + AVINASH KUMAR STATE + KULDEEP SINGH STATE + SAHENSHER PAL CRL.A. 74/2001 Reserved on: November 16, 2017 Date of decision: December 14, 2017 Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 88/2001 Through: Mr Shishir Mathur, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 89/2001 Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma with Ms. Prachee Satija, and Mr. Prakarsh Airyan,Advocate. ...Appellant Crl. Appeal No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 1 of 50 STATE + SUSHIL KUMAR versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 91/2001 Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Advocate. versus ...Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTWith CRL.A. 106/2001 ...Appellant Through: Ms. Sunita Kapil with Ms. Pooja Soami, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.... RESPONDENTAnd STATE + RAMESH CHAND STATE + CHOTTEY LAL CRL.A. 118/2...
Tag this Judgment!Dirshan Vanmali Patel vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(Crl.) 2034/2017 & Crl.MA.No.19111/2017 DIRSHAN VANMALI PATEL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anil Malhotra, Advocate with Mr.Ranjit Malhotra, Mr.Rajat Bhalla, Advocates with petitioner in person. Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Tushar Sannu, Mr.Prashant Singh, Mr.Chaitanya Gosain, Advocates for the State along with S.I. Ashok Bhardwaj, P.S. Amar Colony. Mr.Prabhjit Jauhar, Advocate with Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % ORDER1412.2017 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J:1. At the outset, Mr. Anil Malhotra, Advocate enters appearance on behalf of the... Petitioner. His vakalatnama is taken on record.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a South African national seeking a writ of habeas corpus for the production of his minor daughter who is presently in the custody of his wife, Res...
Tag this Judgment!