Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 18 of about 598 results (0.019 seconds)Santosh Bansal vs.paramjeet Singh
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SANTOSH BANSAL RFA No.1042/2017 15th December, 2017 Through: Versus PARAMJEET SINGH CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Appellant Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate. ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.45600/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.45598/2017 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 286 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.1042/2017 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in a suit filed RFA No.1042/2017 Page 1 of 6 under Order XXXVII CPC, impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 1.12.2016 by which the trial court has dismissed the leave to defend application and decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.80 lacs.4. The facts of the...
Tag this Judgment!Rama Arora & Anr vs.alok Kumar Ranjan
Court: Delhi
+ MAC.APP. 1099/2014 RAMA ARORA & ANR Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. for with Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for R-2. ..... Appellants $~20 & 21 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. h December, 2017 + MAC.APP. 334/2012 and CM No.5721/2012 ALOK KUMAR RANJAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Sahni, Advocate with Mr. Prateek Mehta, Advocate versus SMT RAMA ARORA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate P-2. versus ALOK KUMAR RANJAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.K. Sahni, Advocate with Mr. Prateek Mehta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) The accident claim case (Suit No.246/09) was instituted by Rama Arora (the claimant) on 13.07.2009 seeking compensation for MAC Appeal No.334/2012 & 1099/2014 Page 1 of 5 injuries suffered by her in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 05.01.2009, involving collision between the two cars, one Santro Car, bearing registration No.DL-2C-AD-2256 (hereinafter referred ...
Tag this Judgment!Sarjit & Anr vs.hanuman Das Chaturvedi & Ors (The New India Assurance ...
Court: Delhi
$~22 * % + MAC.APP. 249/2017 SARJIT & ANR versus 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. h December, 2017 Through: Mr. Jatinder Kamra, Adv. ..... Appellants HANUMAN DAS CHATURVEDI & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Adv. for R4. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.3,00,000/-have been awarded to them. The appellants seek enhancement of the compensation amount.2. The accident dated 06th June, 2013 resulted in the death of Netrapal. The deceased was aged 21 years at the time of accident and was survived by his two married brothers. The deceased was a Junior Service Engineer earning Rs.16,000/- per month. The Claims Tribunal did not award any compensation towards loss of dependency on the ground that the appellants were not dependent upon the deceased. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.2,00,000/- towards loss o...
Tag this Judgment!Radha Soami Satsang Beas vs.rajiv Popli & Others
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15.12.2017 $~OS-26 * % + CS(OS) 4054/2014 and IA Nos. 26394/2014, 18906/2015, 11053/2017, 13299/2017, 14850/2017 13504/2015, RADHA SOAMI SATSANG BEAS ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Naval Bhatia and Mr.Preet Pal Singh, Adv. for Plaintiff No.2 with plaintiff-2-in-person. RAJIV POPLI & OTHERS versus ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sanjeev Soni and Mr. Satvik Verma, Advs. for D-1 to 3 with defendant No.3-in-person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This suit was originally filed by plaintiff No.1 seeking a decree of partition and seeking its share of 1/10th (10%) in the property being S-396, G.K.-II, New Delhi. It was averred in the plaint that Sh. Krishan Lal Popli was a disciple of plaintiff No.1 Society. He owned an immovable property being S-396, G.K.-II, New Delhi-110048 measuring 298 sq. Yards. The wife of Sh.Krishan Lal Popli predeceased him on 27.06.1991. Sh.Krishan Lal Popli expired on 15.01.1997. It wa...
Tag this Judgment!Subrati vs.mohd. Naim
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SUBRATI MOHD. NAIM RFA No.1039/2017 Reserved on:13. h December, 2017 Pronounced on:15. h December, 2017 Through: Mr. M.M. Rehman, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. Appl. No.45267/2017 (for delay) This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 18 days in re-filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 18 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned, subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.1039/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.45266/2017 (for stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the defendant in the suit RFA No.1039/2017 Page 1 of 6 impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 16.9.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for possession and permanent injunction wit...
Tag this Judgment!Yashwant Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:15. h December, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 6506/2017 YASHWANT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vishal Maan, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Mr.Siddharth Panda, Adv. for R-1 and ........ RESPONDENTS R-2. Mr.Arjun Pant, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The counsel for the Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) submits that it is not necessary to file the counter affidavit.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a direction to quash the order dated 17.03.2017 passed by the respondent no.2 whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 28-A of the Land W.P.(C) 6506/2017 Page 1 of 4 Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been dism...
Tag this Judgment!Ashmeen vs.department of Women and Child Development and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4507/2017 % Date of Decision:15. h December, 2017 ASHMEEN Through: Mr. Deepak Kuamar Singh, ........ Petitioner versus Adv. DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for R-1/GNCTD. Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI/R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition relates to the implementation of the benefits under the National Food Security Act, 2013 in the slum cluster of Holambi Kalan area of Delhi.2. It is contended that the pregnant and lactating women have been facing challenge in getting the cash assistance benefit under Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana (IGMSY). This writ petition seeks directions to the respondents to ensure implementation of the grievance redressal mechanism under the statutory enactment. W.P.(C) No.4507/2017 Page 1 of 3 3. The respondent No.2-Unio...
Tag this Judgment!National Hydro Electricity Power Corporation Officers Association vs.u ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 15, 2017 + W.P.(C) 1377/2014 NATIONAL HYDRO ELECTRICITY POWER CORPORATION OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh K. Khanna, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pramod D. Gupta, Ms. Kreeti Joshi & Ms. Mannat Sandhu, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC, Mr. Harsh Pandit & Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Shani, Advocates for respondents No.1,3 & 4 with Mr. S.S. Rawat, Under Secretary for UOI Mr. Ajit Puddusary & Mr. A.S Verma, Advocates for respondent No.2 Mr. Bharat Sanghal, Ms. Anandita, Ms. Isha Gupta, Advocates for respondent No.5 Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. PawanUpadhyay & Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates for respondent No.6 Mr. R.K. Joshi & Mr. Jyotinder Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER ORAL1 In this petition, quashing of Office Order of 11/17/2009- NHPC/Vol-III issued by first respondent on 27th December, 2013 is sought. In...
Tag this Judgment!Virendra Singh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
........ Petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI VIRENDRA SINGH Through: Mr. Arjun Gadhoke and Mr. Karam Jot Singh, Advocates. $~10 * + W.P.(C) 8072/2016 & C.M. No.33440/2016 (Directions) UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER1512.2017 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment dated 20.8.2016, passed by the Tribunal whereby his application laying a challenge to the charge Memorandum dated 04.8.2014, was dismissed with directions that the disciplinary authority must complete the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner and pass a consequential order within four months.2. Learned counsel for the respondents states that the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner have concluded and an order dated 02.12.2016 passed by the Disciplinary Authority, imposing a minor penalty of censure against hi...
Tag this Judgment!Telecom Watchdog vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11182/2017 % Date of decision :15. h December, 2017 TELECOM WATCHDOG ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Pranav Sachdeva and Ms. Surabhi Kumari, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1/UOI CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition makes a grievance that a show cause notice cum demand notice dated 23rd October, 2017 (page109) which stood issued to M/s Tikona Digital Networks Pvt. Ltd. is contrary to the notice inviting applications for auction of 3G and BWA spectrum as well as the license agreement between the respondents. In this regard, it is stated in para 4 of the writ petition that the petitioner has lodged complaints on 27th November, 2017 as well as 4th December, 2017. W.P.(C)No.11182/2017 Page 1 of 2 The writ petition had been filed becau...
Tag this Judgment!