Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 13 of about 598 results (0.019 seconds)Kent Ro Systems Ltd & Anr. Vs.pushpendra Yadav & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1469/2016 & I.A.Nos.13499/2016, 1303/2017 KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H., Advocate with Mr. Kumar Chitranshu, Advocate. versus PUSHPENDRA YADAV & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rahul Vidhani, Advocate with Mr. Ashish Singh, Advocate for defendant No.2. Mr. Satish Rai, Advocate for defendant No.8. Date of Decision:19. h December, 2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN MANMOHAN, J (Oral) JUDGMENT1 On 11th July, 2017, learned counsel for defendant no.8 undertook to remove any alleged infringing listing within two days of being informed by the plaintiffs specifying the details of such listing or other data, link or communication. The defendant no.8 also undertook to disclose the names and address of the infringing parties, who had uploaded the infringing material on their websites. He had further stated that in the event the plaintiffs informed the defendants of any alleged illegal listi...
Tag this Judgment!Minakshi Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) 2986/2017 & C.Ms. 12989/2017 & 27136/2017 & Date of Order: December 19, 2017 27137/2017 1. MINAKSHI SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Goel, Advocate Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Singh & Mr. Vinod Kumar Goyal, Advocates for respondents No.1 to 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER ORAL... Petitioner, who is Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) in English, seeks a mandamus to the first three respondents to hold Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for promoting her to the post of Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) English, against a vacant post. Quashing of absorption order of fourth respondent and compliance of letter of 22nd March, 2017 (Annexure P-20) is sought in this petition while drawing attention of this Court to information dated 25th April, 2017 (Annexure P- 2 colly to C.M.27137/2017) sought under Right to Information Act, 2005 to show that petitioners qualification...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance Gen Insurance Co Ltd vs.ashok Kumar Raut & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. h December, 2017 + MAC.APP. 917/2012 and CM APPL.14582/2012 RELIANCE GEN INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Adv. with ..... Appellant Mr. P. Srinivasan, Advocate versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ASHOK KUMAR RAUT & ORS Through: Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) On the accident claim case (MACT No.549/2010) of the first respondent (the claimant) instituted on 23.01.2010, the tribunal returned a finding that he (the claimant) had suffered injuries which had rendered him permanently disabled due to motor vehicular accident that took place on 18.09.2009 involving negligent driving of motor vehicle bearing registration No.DL-1M-2843, which was admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the appellant (insurer), and awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.10,34,550/-, calculating it thus:-"Sl.No.Head Amount (in Rs.) 1. Loss of income 2. Medical expenses 3. Loss of...
Tag this Judgment!Zile Singh vs.gnct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4405/2016 Date of decision:19. h December, 2017 ZILE SINGH Through: Mr. Vishal Maan, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC. Mr. Jayendra, Adv. for Gaon Sabha. Mr. Atul Singh Singh, Adv. for Mr. Rahul Bakshi, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter-affidavit of the respondent / LAC has been handed over in Court. Copy of the same has been supplied to Mr. Vishal Maan, counsel for the petitioner.2. With the consent of the parties, present petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to property bearing plot No.44 measuring 100 Sq. Yds., part of Khasra Nos. 63and 62...
Tag this Judgment!Ganga Yamuna Finvest Pvt Ltd (In Leqn) Thr the Official Liquidator vs. ...
Court: Delhi
$~25 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CM No.46293/2017 in FAO(OS) 189/2017 Date of decision :19. h December, 2017 GANGA YAMUNA FINVEST PVT LTD (IN LEQN) THR THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR ..... Appellant Through : Ms Ruchi Sindhwani, Sr. Standing Counsel for the office of the official liquidator with Ms. Megha, Adv. versus SMC GLOBAL SECURITIES LTD & ORS....... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Naresh Thanai, Adv. for R CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.46293/2017 1. Issue notice to the non-applicant.2. Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, ld. Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the office of the official liquidator of the appellant- company in the present matter.3. This appeal lays a challenge to the order dated 16th February, 2017 passed by the ld. Single Judge. By way of this order, the FAO(OS)No.189/2017 Page 1 of 4 Chamber Appeal (O.A.No.237/2016), which was filed by the appellant against...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Sanjeev Kumar vs.medical Council of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 19, 2017 * + W.P.(C) 11353/2017 & C.M. 46387-88/2017 1. DR. SANJEEV KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh and Mr. Punam Singh, Advocates Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. T. Singh & Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Arpit Shukla, CGSC for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER ORAL Aggrieved by Notification of 5th June, 2017 (Annexure P-8), petitioner made a Representation (Annexure P-11) to respondent-Medical Council of India on 23rd September, 2017, which, according to petitioner, has not been responded to. Copy of Representation (Annexure P-10) is said to have been sent on 25th September, 2017 to Oversight Committee mandated by Supreme Court of India.2. Upon notice, learned counsel for respondent-MCI submits that if Representation (Annexure P-11) has not been already responded to, then it would be decided within a period o...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Kumar vs.lt Governor Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~17 * % + W.P.(C) 6454/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19. h December, 2017 ASHOK KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Akhil Sachar and Ms.Gayatri versus Nandwani, Advts. with petitioner in person. LT GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advts. for LAC/L&B. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court. Copy of the same has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land bearing Khasra No.min measuring 1 bigha situated in the revenue estate of village Pehladpur Bangar, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject ...
Tag this Judgment!Wimpy International Ltd. Vs.gulshan Dhingra
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.1053/2017 + % WIMPY INTERNATIONAL LTD. Through:19. h December, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Advocate with Ms. Arti Anupriya, Advocate and Ms. Preeti Singh, Advocate. versus GULSHAN DHINGRA CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.46183/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Nos.46182/2017 (for condonation of delay in filing) & 46185/2017 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) 2. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay of one day in filing and eight days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M.s stand disposed of. RFA No.1053/2017 Page 1 of 12 RFA No.1053/2017 and C.M. No.46184/2017 (stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 2...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Kumar and Ors vs.airport Authority of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. 12.2017 W.P.(C) 7706/2012 & CM Nos.19468/2012 & 44929/2017 % + JAI KUMAR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Versus ........ RESPONDENTS AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : For the Respondent: Mr Sanjay Sharawat. Mr Digvijay Rai an Mr Pulkit Tyagi, for R- 1/AAI. Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs Kaomudi Pathak, Mr Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr Kushal Raj Tater, for LAC. Mr Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioners have filed the present petition impugning an order 1. the impugned order), whereby their dated 26.11.2012 (hereafter representation for allotment of an alternative plot of 100 sq. mtrs. was rejected by respondent No.4 (the Nodal Officer). The petitioners further seek an order directing the respondents to allot an alternative/rehabilitation plot measuring 100 sq. mtrs. at rehabilitation site in Village Rangpuri,...
Tag this Judgment!Neelima Kapoor vs.the Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 19, 2017 + W.P.(C) 11376/2017 1. NEELIMA KAPOOR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Monica Kapoor, Advocate Versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Shruti Munjal & Ms. Bhavna Gupta, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER ORAL... Petitioner is a retired Post Graduate Teacher, who claims payment of gratuity after calculating her entire service period.2. Despite service of advance notice, none has appeared on behalf of respondents No.2 & 3.3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that gratuity has been paid to petitioner by respondent-School while treating the service period to be twenty seven years and six months whereas, petitioner has rendered service of twenty nine years, two months and twenty eight days and so, the gratuity needs to be recalculated. It is submitted by petitioners counsel that first respondent vide its Communication...
Tag this Judgment!