Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 15 of about 598 results (0.009 seconds)Seema & Ors vs.narinder Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :30. h NOVEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :18. h DECEMBER, 2017 SEEMA & ORS FAO4132016 ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate. versus NARINDER SINGH & ANR Through : Ms.Prerana, Advocate, for LRs of R1. Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocate, for R2. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.CM463742016 (Delay) 1. For the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, the delay is condoned.2. The application for condonation of delay is disposed of. FAO4132016 1. Present appeal under Section 30 of The Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter the Act) has been preferred by the appellants against the respondents to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 30.11.2015 whereby their claim petition FAO4132016 Page 1 of 3 was dismissed by the Commissioner. The appeal is contested by the respondents.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined ...
Tag this Judgment!Sanmati Sabha vs.j K Mittal & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA5182016 Date of Decision:18. h December, 2017. SANMATI SABHA ..... Appellant Through Mr. K.L. N. Murty, Sr, Advocate with Mr. K.P.S. Rao and Mr. Nimish Chib, Advocates. versus J K MITTAL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.J.K.Mittal, Advocate in person as respondent no.1 with Rajveer Singh & Mr. Nikhil Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This intra court Letters Patent Appeal by Sanmati Sabha, Priyadarshini Vihar, impugns orders dated 29th July, 2016 and 7th September, 2016 passed by single Judges of this court in Contempt Case No.339/2008. LPA518/2016 Page 1 of 14 2. At the outset, we record that though this appeal arises from contempt proceedings, it is not possible to dispose of the appeal keeping in view the parameters of contempt jurisdiction. The reason is a string of orders passed in the contempt proceedings and collateral proceedings which ar...
Tag this Judgment!Kuldip Singh vs.kishan Kumar (Deceased) Through Lrs. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Appellant 18th December, 2017 RFA No.1051/2017 + % KULDIP SINGH KISHAN KUMAR (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA Through: Mr. Murari Kumar, Mr. Aman Jha, Advocates versus ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.46126/2017(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.1051/2017 & CM No.46127/2017 (stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.1(a) in the suit, and who is one of the legal heirs of the original defendant no.1 Sh. Pratap Singh, impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 04.09.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the RFA No.1051/2017 Page 1 of 8 plaintiffs/respondent nos. 1(a) to 1(e) herein, for partition with respect to property bearing no.212, Humanyun Pur, Sardarjung, New Delhi on a plot admeasuring ap...
Tag this Judgment!Ai-Hind Party & Anr. Vs.the Registrar General and Census, Commission o ...
Court: Delhi
$~15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3946/2017 % Date of decision :18. h December, 2017 AI-HIND PARTY & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through : Kumar Rajesh Singh and Ms. Punam Singh, Advs. versus THE REGISTRAR GENERAL AND CENSUS, COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Seerat Singh, Advs. for R-2 to 5 Mr.R. Sathish, Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Ms. Sonia, Advs. for R-6/NCBC CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition seeks issuance of an order directing the respondents to enumerate and classify the tribes and communities of De-Notified Tribes and Nomadic and Semi Nomadic Tribes separately and distinctly; collect their Socio-Educational and Economic Indicators as well as Human Development Indices with Deprivation Indices in the Census of 2022. W.P.(C)No.3946/2017 Page 1 of 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over co...
Tag this Judgment!Air India Ltd vs.capt Suresh Kumar & Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved On Judgment pronounced On :17. 11.20 18.12.2017 LPA6942017 & C.M. No.38734-38735/2017 AIR INDIA LTD Versus CAPT SURESH KUMAR & ANR LPA6962017 & C.M. No.38741-38742/2017 AIR INDIA LTD Versus CAPT A K DEWAN & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS :Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra, Ms. Bhavna Dhami and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeals essentially seek quashing of the common judgment and order dated 22nd March, 2017 passed in W.P.(C) No.780/2004 titled as Capt. Suresh Kumar vs. Union of India & Anr. and W.P.(C) No.13357/2004 titled as Capt. A.K. Dewan vs. Indian Airlines Limited, LPA Nos. 694/2017 & 696/2017 Page 1 of 10 whereby, whilst allowing the...
Tag this Judgment!P N Dewan & Anr. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. h December, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 1737/2015 & CRL.M.A.6262/2015 P N DEWAN ...... Petitioner No.1 M/S DEVANS MODERN BREWERIES LTD. ...... Petitioner No.2 Through: Mr.Ashok Bhan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Shailender Kumar and Mr.Rajesh Sharma, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State SI Pradeep Sharma, PS-I.P.Estate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 By way of the above captioned petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioners seek to set aside the impugned order dated 24th January, 2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi whereby the revision petition against the orders dated 2nd April, 2008 CRL.M.C.1737/2015 Page 1 of 21 and charge dated 19th April, 2008 were dismissed and to quash all the proceedings emanating from FIR No.493 of 1995 under Sections 420/199/200 IPC regi...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.mustkeem & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :23. d NOVEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :18. h DECEMBER, 2017 + FAO4282016 & C.M.No.32382/2016 (Stay) RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through : Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocate. versus MUSTKEEM & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.R.K.Nain, Advocate, for R-1. Mr.Ankur Chhibber with Mr.Bhanu Gupta, Advocates for GNCTD. Mr.K.Sunil with Mr.Mani Shankar, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P GARG, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred by the Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd.(hereinafter the appellant) to challenge the legality and correctness of an Order dated 13.05.2016 of learned Commissioner, Employees Compensation (hereinafter the Commissioner) whereby compensation of `8,90,480/- was awarded to FAO4282016 Page 1 of 6 the legal heirs of the deceased Begum Monna @ Muna. The appeal is contested by respondent No.1-Mustkeem.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Re...
Tag this Judgment!Vipin Chugh vs.lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3715/2016 Date of Judgment:18. h December, 2017 VIPIN CHUGH Through: Ms.Esha Mazumdar, Mr.Setu Niket ........ Petitioner LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS and Mr.Nishant Verma, Advts. Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel for L&B/LAC with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. Mr.Ajay Verma, Standing counsel for DDA with Mr.Kush Sharma and Mr.Sagar Bhatia, Advts. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect of the land of the petitioner bearing Khasra No.(1-5) situated in the revenue estate of village Pansali, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of the ...
Tag this Judgment!j.n. Chamber and Anr. Vs.government of National Capital Territory of D ...
Court: Delhi
$~37 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:18. h December, 2017 + W.P. (C.)10858/2015 J.N. CHAMBER AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Ms.Deepika V. Marwaha and Mr. V.K. Shailendra, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain,Standing with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Dhanesh Relan and Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners. The petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petition ers comprised in Khasra no.1291 min measuring 2 bigha 8 biswa, situated in the revenue estate of village Malikpur Kohi @ Rangpuri, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) is deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair...
Tag this Judgment!r.r. Pradhan vs.chief Commissioner of Persons With Disabilities & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~58. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11221/2017 & C.M. Nos. 45859-861/2017 1. R.R. PRADHAN Through: Mr. Goutam Bhol, Advocate with petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER1812.2017 This petition has been filed by the petitioner, assailing an order dated 09.01.2017, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.1052/2014, filed by him, being aggrieved by the order dated 10.03.2014, passed by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, who had rejected his plea that in view of an earlier disability certificate dated 04.03.2009, submitted by him to the respondent No.2, he ought not to have been put through a fresh medical examination or called upon to appear before Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital for issuance of a Disability Certificate in Form IV, as prescribed in the Person...
Tag this Judgment!