Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 12 of about 598 results (0.019 seconds)m/s.antex Pharma Pvt Ltd vs.pureca Laboratories (P) Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr. Sumit Rajput, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff CS(COMM) 1315/2016 M/S.ANTEX PHARMA PVT LTD28$~ * + % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN versus PURECA LABORATORIES (P) LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: None Date of Decision:19. h December, 2017 MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining violation of copyright by way of infringement and violation of rights in trademark/trade dress/label/packaging by way of passing off, unfair competition, dilution, rendition of accounts/damages, delivery up etc. The prayers made in the suit are reproduced hereinbelow:-"a. a decree for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners or proprietor as the case may be, in business, distributors, licensees and dealers from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in pharmaceuticals preparation including liver their assigns CS(COMM) 1315 /2016 Page 1...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Dinesh Kumar Tyagi vs.ministry of Personal, P. G. And Pension
Court: Delhi
$~3. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10328/2017 and CM APPL. 42110/2017 1. SHRI DINESH KUMAR TYAGI Through: Mr. Prince Arora, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus MINISTRY OF PERSONAL, P. G. AND PENSION..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Divyya Kapur and Mr. Shivi Sanyam, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The petitioner is aggrieved by the Memorandum dated 18.04.2017, ORDER1912.2017 issued by the respondent No.1/SSC, declaring him medically unfit for recruitment to the post of Sub-Inspector in the Delhi Police, CAPFs and Assistant Sub-Inspector in CISF Examination, 2016, on the ground that he had made a partial liver donation four and a half year ago, which Memorandum has been upheld by the Review Medical Board, vide decision dated 17.07.2017.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that vide Notification dated 09.01.2016, the respondents had invited applications for recruitment to the post o...
Tag this Judgment!Niit Technologies Limited vs.directorate General, Border Security Forc ...
Court: Delhi
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB. P. 481/2017 NIIT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Date of decision:19. h December, 2017 .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikas Dutta & Mr.Siddharth Chander Joshi, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL, BORDER SECURITY FORCE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Praveen Kumar Jain, Adv. alongwith MrB.S. Rautela, AC of respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Acceptance of Tender No.P-4/857(AT- IPP)/PC/BSF/45/2010/1486-1516 dated February 25, 2010 ("Agreement") for the Supply, Installation and Commissioning of BSF Intranet Prahari Project on the Turnkey basis.2. The Agreement between the parties contains Arbitration Agreement in form of Clauses 20 (XIX) to (XXI) a...
Tag this Judgment!Ms. Shikha Khullar vs.life Insurance Corporation of India
Court: Delhi
$~209 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11352/2017 MS. SHIKHA KHULLAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Sikha Sapra and Mr Sumit Chander, Advocates. versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Vishwendra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1912.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM No.46385/2017 1.2. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11352/2017 and CM No.46386/2017 3. The petitioner has filed the present petitioner impugning a communication dated 05.09.2017 issued by the respondent.4. The petitioner is essentially aggrieved on two counts. First that the respondent has held that she is not entitled to Renewal Commission on discontinuation of her agency. According to the respondent, the petitioner would be entitled to such Renewal Commission after her ceasing to be an agency, only if she does not directly or indirectly solicit or procure or W.P.(C) 11352/2017 Page 1 of 6 pr...
Tag this Judgment!Amar Nath vs.jee Ram & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Review Pet. No.254/2017 & CM No.23490/2017 in RFA No.394/2017 % Judgment Reserved on:05. 09.2017 Judgment Pronounced on:19. 12.2017 AMAR NATH ..... PETITIONER Through: Mr. J.M. Bari and Ms.Shweta Bari, Advocates Versus JEE RAM & ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks review of the judgment dated 15th May 2017 passed in the RFA No.394/2017. This petition is one of the classic examples of how the judicial process is being misused by unscrupulous litigants.2. The... Petitioner herein is the son of the... RESPONDENTS. The... Petitioner is 52 years of age and thus the... RESPONDENTS must be more than 75 years of age. The suit of the respondents for Review Petition No.254/2017 in R.F.A. No.394/2017 Page 1 of 11 possession against the petitioner in respect of their property consisting of two rooms, latrine, bath-room and ...
Tag this Judgment!Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited vs.beeta Cable Network
Court: Delhi
F-37 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 3269/2015 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. K.K. Khetan, Advocate versus BEETA CABLE NETWORK Through: None. ..... Defendant % Date of Decision:19. h December, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, damages, rendition of accounts etc. The prayers made in the plaint are reproduced hereinbelow:-"34 (i) An order of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, their officers, servants, agents, partners and representatives and all others acting for and on their behalf from either engaging in themselves or from authorizing, the recording, distributing, broadcasting, public performance/communication to the public or in any other way exploiting the cinematograph films, sound CS(OS) 3269/2015 Page 1 of 7 recordings and/or literary works (lyrics) and Musical works (musical c...
Tag this Judgment!New Delhi Traders Association & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~210 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11358/2017 NEW DELHI TRADERS ASSOCIATION & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr P.S. Bindra, Ms Rishika Arora and Ms Savi Abbot, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr Gaurav Rohilla, GP and Mr T.P. Singh, Advocates for R-1 & 3. UNION OF INDIA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1912.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM No.46396/2017 1.2. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11358/2017 and CM No.46395/2017 3. The petitioner no.1 is a registered society and an Association of Persons, who are in occupation of premises located in Connaught Place, New Delhi.4. The principal grievance of the petitioner is that respondent no.2, New Delhi Municipal Council (hereafter NDMC), and respondent no.3, the Heritage Conservation Committee (hereafter HCC), are insisting the members of the petitioner no.1 association to seek permission o...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Kumar Ahuja vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) 9752/2017, CM Nos.39702-03/2017 & 5595/2017 Date of Decision: December 19, 2017 ANIL KUMAR AHUJA Through: Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 and R-2 Mr.Gautam Narayan, ASC and Mr.R.A.Iyer and Ms.Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advocates for R-4, R-5 and R-6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL1 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the transfer order of 17th October, 2017 (Annexure P-1) has been partially implemented to the extent that Sh.Surender Singh, Chief Engineer (PWD), Delhi has been transferred to Himachal Pradesh on 7th December, 2017 and now petitioner is to be posted as Chief Engineer (PWD), Delhi. It is pointed out that since respondent-Government of NCT of Delhi had taken time to comply with the order of 17th October, 2017 (Annexure P-1) so in the interregnum, petitioner was made to join as Chief Project Manag...
Tag this Judgment!Sharmila Yadav vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP (C) No.4651/2017 Reserved on :19. h September, 2017 Pronounced on:19. h December, 2017 SHARMILA YADAV ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms. Shivangi Sinha and Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.Sharmila Yadav, the writ petitioner, has filed the present petition for grant of notional seniority in the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector (Mahila) with effect from 6th July, 2011 with all consequential benefits. She has also prayed for quashing of orders dated 2nd August, 2016 and 8th February, 2017, whereby the respondents have rejected her case for fixation of seniority in the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector (M) with effect from 6th July, 2011.2. The petitioner had joined the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) at the post of Head Constable (M) upon ...
Tag this Judgment!Nitin Chawla vs.m/s Ahuja Creations Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. h December, 2017 CRL.M.C. 215/2015 & CRL.M.A. 869/2015 1. NITIN CHAWLA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Upadhay, Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Kr. Mishra, Advocates. versus 1. M/s AHUJA CREATIONS PVT. LTD.2. STATE OF NCT, DELHI ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State. Mr. Rajesh Mahindru, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I. S. MEHTA, J.1. By way of the instant petition the petitioner-Nitin Chawla, invokes inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the summoning order dated 10.12.2010 and the order dated 21.06.2014 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (C-02), Delhi in CC. No.707/RN/10.2. The brief facts stated are that the respondent No.1/complainant- M/s. Ahuja Creations Pvt. Ltd. had filed a Crl.M.C. 215/2015 Page 1 of 15 complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as NI...
Tag this Judgment!