Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjiv Kumar Jindal vs.anil Kumari @ Neelam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : November 21, 2016 MAT.A.(F.C.) 23/2015 SANJIV KUMAR JINDAL Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Abhinav Bajaj, Advocate with Mr.Sahil Munjal, Advocate versus .....Respondent None Represented by: ANIL KUMARI @ NEELAM CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The thematic setting of the case pleaded by the appellant seeking dissolution of the marriage solemnized on December 18, 1999 with the respondent as per Hindu Rites and Customs is that right from day one of the marriage the attitude of the respondent was cold towards him and his family members. Residing with his parents, appellants mother had to perform all household chores. As a working lady, the respondent would leave the house early morning at 8.00 A.M. This queer conduct of respondent baffled the appellant and his parents who discussed the same with parents of the respondents but got no satisfactory an...
Union of India & Anr vs.d.p. Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.726/2012 Reserved on:10. h August, 2016 Date of Decision:21. t November, 2016 % UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sameer Aggarwal, Advocate. versus D.P. SINGH & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ashok Singh, Advocate. LPA7272012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sameer Aggarwal, Advocate. versus AMIT RAI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ashok Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.These two intra-Court appeals impugn the common order and judgment dated 30th July, 2012 passed in W.P. (C) No.4351/2010, D.P. Singh & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. and W.P. (C) No.4886/2010, Amit Rai & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. LPA Nos. 726/2012 & 727/2012 Page 1 of 36 2. The writ petitioners having succeeded before the Single Judge are the respondents in the present appeals, preferred by the Union Of India and the Executive Director, Building Materials ...
Administrator General vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t November, 2016 TEST.CAS. 13/1973 ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat & Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advs. STATE & ORS Versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW R.P. Singh, Adv. for Objectors. On 6th October, 1971, one Mohan Singh Sangar filed a petition under % + 1. Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, registered as Probate Case No.12/1971 of this Court, seeking probate of the document dated 11th May, 1971 stated to be the last Will of Smt. Dropadi Devi widow of Sh. Uma Datt Sharma, resident of 110, Darya Ganj, Delhi who died at Shahpur, District Ambala on 21st July, 1971, in his capacity as the named executor in the said document, the other named executor viz. Uma Datt Sharma having died on 17th July, 1971. TEST. CAS. No.13/1973 Page 1 of 33 2. The aforesaid probate case No.12/1971 was entertained. Objections ...
Smt Shushma & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4162/2016 SMT SHUSHMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Date of Decision: November 21st, 2016 STATE & ANR versus Through: Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Mr. Abhishek Chakarravorty, Advocates ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Satish Kumar, Police Station Crime Branch, Delhi Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Smt. Sushma, Sh. Arun, Sh. Pawan, Sh. Rakesh and Sh. Raj @ Jagsawran for quashing of FIR No.733/2014 dated 04.09.2014, under Section 354/509/323/3IPC registered at Police Station Amar Colony on the basis of mediation report, Saket Courts, New Delhi in view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2 namely, Smt. Kamla 25.04.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in...
Deep Chand (Deceased ) Thr Lrs vs.ram Wati & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
$~15 and 28. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA4412016 and RFA1052015 1. DEEP CHAND (DECEASED ) THR LRS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vikramjit Reen, Advocate with all the appellants in person. versus RAM WATI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K. Raj, Advocate for R-1 with R-1 in person. Mr. Sushil Kumar Jha, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Counsel for the appellants states that prior to passing of the final ORDER2111.2016 decree of partition, vide the impugned judgment and decree dated 25.05.2016, a preliminary decree was passed by the trial court on 12.01.2015, whereunder the legal heirs of Late Shri Deep Chand {appellant No.1 (a-c)} collectively, the legal heirs of Late Shri Ram Kishan (appellant No.2 -7) collectively, Smt. Ram Wati, (respondent No.1) and Munni Devi (respondent No.2) were held entitled to 1/4th undivided share each in the suit premises. RFA4412016 and 105/2015 Page 1 of 4 2. Aggrieved by the preliminary...
Pawan vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4183/2016 PAWAN Date of Decision: November 21st, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Renu Panchal, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Jitender, Special Staff, SED. Mohd. Tahir Qidwai, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Pawan for quashing of FIR No.1012/2014 dated 02.11.2014, under Section 354D IPC registered at Police Station Kalkaji on the basis of mediation report, Saket Courts, New Delhi in view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no.2 namely, Smt. Sandhya 27.08.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant in the FIR in question by her counsel.3. Th...
Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd. Vs.dcit Circle 11(1)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:21. 11.2016 ITA4702016 INDIABULLS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. G.C. Srivastava and Mr. Daksh S. Bhardwaj, Advs. versus DCIT CIRCLE111) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Puneet Rai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J (Oral) ITA4702016 & CM No.26633/2016 The issue in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax 1. Act, 1961 (in short the Act) is the Revenues action in disallowing Rs. 3,87,10,146/- under Section 14A of the Act. The assessee urges that without recording his dissatisfaction as a prelude to the exercise conducted by him under the said provisions, further disallowance was not possible.2. The facts are that the assessee had reported Tax Exempt Income to the tune of Rs. 105.24 crores, during Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10. The assessee had offered disallowance of Rs. 25,19,380/- ITA4702016 Page 1 o...
Kamla & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4170/2016 Date of Decision: November 21st, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Mr. Abhishek Chakarravorty, Advocates KAMLA & ORS. STATE & ANR. versus Through: Mr. Sundershan Joon, Additional ........ RESPONDENTS Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Satish Kumar, Police Station Crime Branch, Delhi Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Smt. Kamla, Sh. Devanand, Sh. Sukhdevi and Sh. Jagdish for quashing of FIR No.734/2014 dated 04.09.2014, under Section 354/509/323/3IPC registered at Police Station Amar Colony on the basis of mediation report, Saket Courts, New Delhi in view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2 namely, Smt. Sushma 25.04.2016.2. respondent-State for submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has...
Gomti Prashad vs.rajender & Anr (National Insurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 21, 2016 + MAC.APP. 119/2016 GOMTI PRASHAD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. H.N. Pandey, Advocate versus RAJENDER & ANR (NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.A.K. Choudhary, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for respondent No.2-insurance company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 23rd September, 2015 grants compensation of `93,828/- with interest to respondent-claimant in respect of a road accident on 1st June, 2002 in which respondent-claimant had sustained grievous injuries. The challenge to impugned Award by learned counsel for appellant-driver is on the ground that liability to pay the compensation MAC APP. 119/2016 Page 1 of 3 has been erroneously put on the owner of the vehicle in question as the insurance premium cheque does not relate to the owner of the vehicle in question. It is submitted that no information about dishonouring of...
Raj Kumar vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1037/2016 Date of Decision: November 21st, 2016 Through Mr.R.K.Jain, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS RAJ KUMAR STATE & ANR Through: Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP. Mr.Nikhil Yadav, Adv.for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Raj Kumar for quashing of FIR No.67/2012 dated 29.03.2012, under Sections 287/338/374 IPC IPC, Section 26 JJ Act &Child Labour Act registered at Police Station Subzi Mandi on the basis of settlement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no.2 namely, Sh. Sikander Kumar.2. respondent-State Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant in the FIR in question by his counsel.3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the complainant, aged 13 years as on the date of the incide...