Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jaurasia Hinges & Screws vs.commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~4 to 6 & 8 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2016 + (5) + (6) + (8) + (9) + W.P.(C) 8712/2016, CM APPL. 35749/2016 DOOR DECO INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 10121/2016, CM APPL. 40111/2016 JAURASIA HINGES & SCREWS ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 8998/2016, CM APPL. 36506/2016 AGGARWAL INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 9476/2016, CM APPL. 37887/2016 OM INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETILEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... R...
Pinku @ Samruit Ranjan Dash vs.shri Ram General Insurance Co Ltd &Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~28 to 31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 23, 2016 (i) + MAC.APP. 260/2016 SONI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.1-insurance company (ii) + MAC.APP. 357/2016 PINKU @ SAMRUIT RANJAN DASH versus Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate ..... Appellant SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD &ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.1-insurance company (iii) + MAC.APP. 495/2015 & C.M.11356/2015 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate ..... Appellant versus MAC APPs.260/16, 357/16, 4& 4Page 1 of 10 SONI & ORS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate for .....Respondents (vi) + MAC.APP. 497/2015 & C.M.11364/2015 respondent-claimant SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate ..... Appellant versus PINKU @ SAMRUTI DASH & ORS .....Respondents Through: M...
Yogendra Kumar Modi vs.m.k. Modi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d November, 2016. CS(OS) 1585/2008 & IA No.2258/2016 (of D-2 u/O7R-11 CPC), OA No.49/2013 (against order dated 1st February, 2013 of JR), IA No.4853/2013 (of D-2 u/S151CPC) & OA No.401/2015 (of D-2 against order dated 14th September, 2015 of JR) YOGENDRA KUMAR MODI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhawa, Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Ms. Ritika Ahuja and Mr. Vipul Joshi, Advs. Versus M.K. MODI & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta and Mr. Shekhar Gupta, Advs. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 On 6th September, 2016, when this suit was heard last, the following order was passed: 1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit under Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.2,89,00,000/- with interest jointly and severally from the two defendants.2. The two defendants applied separately for leave to defend. Both the defendants were granted conditional leave to defend i.e...
Madhu Chona vs.the Chairman & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~25. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11073/2016 and CM APPL. 43299/2016 MADHU CHONA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Kamlesh Mahajan, Advocate versus 1. THE CHAIRMAN & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Mahima Bahl and Mr. Sumant Bhushan, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition ORDER2311.2016 while reserving the right of her client to seek her remedies against the respondent No.2 on the civil and/or criminal sides, as may be permissible in law.2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith the pending application. HIMA KOHLI, J NOVEMBER23 2016 rkb/ap...
Tenzin Tselha vs.union of India 0& Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2016 $~46 * % + W.P.(C) 7035/2015 & CM APPL. 12891/2015 TENZIN TSELHA versus UNION OF INDIA0 ORS Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr Jayant Tripathi, Advocate. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-1 to 4/UOI. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner, who is a child of Tibetan parents and born in India on or after 26.01.1950 and before 01.07.1987, as citizens of India in view of Section 3(1) (a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and to issue Indian passports.2. The petitioner was born on 11.5.1987. The petitioner, in this petition, claims citizenship of India on the basis of Section 3(1)(a) of the Act. W.P.(C) Nos. 7035 /2015 Page 1 of 11 3. It is contended by the petitioner that the pe...
Anita Kumari Gupta vs.ved Bhushan & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1093/2011 ANITA KUMARI GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr Rohit Yadav and Mr Karan Singh alongwith Advocates Thukral, plaintiff in person. versus VED BHUSHAN & OTHERS ..... Defendants Through: Mr Sanjiv Kakra and Mr Irfan Ahmed, Advocates for D-1, 2, 5 & 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2311.2016 VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.11968/2016 1. The present application has been filed by defendant No.1(B) under Order VIII Rule 1A (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter 'the CPC') for taking on record the original Will dated 08.12.1988.2. The plaintiff/non-applicant has filed the above captioned suit praying for a decree of partition in respect of the property bearing No.24, Pusa Road, New Delhi-110005. The plaintiff claims to be 1/6th owner of the suit property.3. It is the applicant/defendants case that the suit property had been purchased by late Smt. Lajwanti Devi, the mother of the parties, by a duly CS(OS) 1093/20...
Om Industries vs.commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax Settlement ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~4 to 6 & 8 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2016 + (5) + (6) + (8) + (9) + W.P.(C) 8712/2016, CM APPL. 35749/2016 DOOR DECO INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 10121/2016, CM APPL. 40111/2016 JAURASIA HINGES & SCREWS ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 8998/2016, CM APPL. 36506/2016 AGGARWAL INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 9476/2016, CM APPL. 37887/2016 OM INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETILEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... R...
Shri Ram General Insurance Co Ltd &Ors vs.pinku @ Samruti Dash & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~28 to 31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 23, 2016 (i) + MAC.APP. 260/2016 SONI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.1-insurance company (ii) + MAC.APP. 357/2016 PINKU @ SAMRUIT RANJAN DASH versus Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate ..... Appellant SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD &ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.1-insurance company (iii) + MAC.APP. 495/2015 & C.M.11356/2015 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate ..... Appellant versus MAC APPs.260/16, 357/16, 4& 4Page 1 of 10 SONI & ORS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate for .....Respondents (vi) + MAC.APP. 497/2015 & C.M.11364/2015 respondent-claimant SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate ..... Appellant versus PINKU @ SAMRUTI DASH & ORS .....Respondents Through: M...
Rajkumar Paswan vs.university of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + % RAJKUMAR PASWAN W.P.(C) No.105/2016 23rd November, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manu Padalia, Advocate for Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugning the order passed by the respondent on 10.12.2015 terminating the services of the petitioner.... Petitioner also seeks the relief of reinstatement of his services with the respondent along with consequential monetary benefits.2. A reading of the writ petition shows that the petitioner was appointed as a contractual employee for a contractual period. This is also found in the W.P.(C) No.105/2016 Page 1 of 4 impugned order passed by the respondent on 10.12.2015. In fact, the order dated 10.12.2015 noted that petitio...
Rishi Seals Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax Se ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~4 to 6 & 8 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2016 + (5) + (6) + (8) + (9) + W.P.(C) 8712/2016, CM APPL. 35749/2016 DOOR DECO INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 10121/2016, CM APPL. 40111/2016 JAURASIA HINGES & SCREWS ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 8998/2016, CM APPL. 36506/2016 AGGARWAL INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 9476/2016, CM APPL. 37887/2016 OM INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETILEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... R...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »