Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr. Pxxx vs.ministry of Health and Family Welfare & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Mr. PXXX W.P.(C) No.7898/2016 22nd November, 2016 Ms. Sija Nair Pal, Adv. ........ Petitioner Through: versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS. Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar ........ RESPONDENTS and Ms. Santwana, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, ASC for GNCTD for R-2,3 & 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner by way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the relief of direction to the respondent nos. 7 and 8 to reinstate the petitioner in his employment.... Petitioner also claims consequential relief of payment of back wages.... Petitioner also claims compensation of Rs.10 lacs for the trauma and pain caused by the undignified treatment and violation of fundamental rights of the petitioner by the respondent nos. 7 and 8.... Petitioner pleads that he became an HIV W.P(C) No.7898/2016 Page 1 of 4 patient o...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8 vs.m/s Super Malls Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
$~4-7 * + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA4492016 ITA4502016 & CM No.26463/2016 ITA4512016 & CM No.26464/2016 ITA4532016 & CM No.26466/2016 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX- 8 ..... Appellant M/S SUPER MALLS PVT. LTD., Versus Through: ..... Respondent Shri Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel, Shri Sanjay Kumar and Shri Advocates for Appellants. Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate for Respondent M/s Super Malls Pvt. Ltd. A. Maheshwari, Vikrant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % ORDER22.11.2016 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed off. CM Nos.26463, 26464 & 26466/2016 (for exemption) 1.2. ITA Nos. 449-451 & 453 of 2016 Admit.3. The question of law urged is whether in the circumstances of the case, 4. the ITAT findings that the satisfaction note was flawed and could not withstand scrutiny under Section 153(C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act) is correct. This Co...
Anil Kumar vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 294/2016 ANIL KUMAR Date of Decision :22. d November, 2016 Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) 1. Leaned counsel for the petitioner has restricted his arguments to the following contentions : - (i) The Tribunal, while dismissing OA N.3091/2014, vide order dated 1.7.2015, has made observations on merits, which are likely to prejudice the petitioner in the disciplinary inquiry. (ii) The petitioner should not have been suspended on oral instructions or approval by the Chief Secretary, who is the competent officer to suspend a group B employee. (iii) The petitioner was suspended vide order dated 25.2.2014 and WP(C) No.294/2016 Page 1 of 8 the chargesheet was issued on 29.9.2015. As per the mandate and ratio of the decision of the ...
Entertainment Television Network Ltd and Anr. Vs.union of India and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
$~67 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11004/2016 & CM Nos.43047/2016 (stay) Judgment delivered on:22. 11.2016 ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION NETWORK LTD AND ANR. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner : Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikram Mehta, Mr. Siddhartha Jain, Mr. Gaurav Choudhary and Ms. Raka Chatterjee, Advocates. : For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC for respondent No.1. JUDGMENT2211.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties the Writ Petition is taken up for disposal today itself.2. The petitioners seek quashing of order dated 04.11.2016, whereby, the respondent No.1 has proceeded ex-parte against the petitioners and has declined to renew the permission granted to the petitioners for setting up Teleport at Mumbai and for permission to uplink and d...
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence vs.amit Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. M.C. 5320/2013 & CRL.M.A. No.19204/2013 Date of Decision:22. November, 2016 DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amish Aggarwala and Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocates. versus AMIT KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S. S. Das, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. MEHTA, J.1. Instant petition is arising out of the impugned order passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS cases, Saket, New Delhi, dated 12.12.2013 qua against the present petitioner, i.e., Directorate of Revenue Intelligence( DRI), who preferred to file the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for setting aside/quashing of the aforesaid impugned order.2. The brief facts stated are that, on the basis of the secret information, the petitioner's, i.e., Directorate of Revenue Intelligence(DRI), officers had effected a seizure of 272.800 Kg of contraband substance from a three wheeler luggage carrier be...
Delhi University Contract Employees’ Union and Ors. Vs.university of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.989/2013 & CM Nos.20764/2013, 10976/2014 % DELHI UNIVERSITY CONTRACT EMPLOYEES UNION AND ORS. Date of decision :22. d November, 2016 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Mr. Rajiv Agarwal, Ms. Nilam Tiwari, Mr. Vikram and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC for R-1 Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, ASC for R-1 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJI JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, J1 The appellants before us assail the judgment dated 16th December, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing W.P.(C) No.7929/2013 rejecting the appellants prayer for the relief of quashing of the general selection process for appointment to the post of Junior Assistants to the respondent no.1 pursuant to LPA9892013 Page 1 of 49 their advertisement Advt. No.Estab.IV/246/2013 dated 6th November, 2013.2. The Delhi University Contract Employees Union ha...
Manoj Kumar vs.pinki Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
$~R-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : November 22, 2016 MAT. APP. (F.C.) 6/2016 MANOJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Abdul Sattar, Advocate with Appellant in person ..... Respondent versus PINKI RANI Represented by: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The appeal has reached for hearing.2. 3. None has appeared for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record of the learned Judge, Family Court.4. Marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on February 19, 1995. A male child was born to the couple on November 27, 1995.5. There were various issues between the parties evidenced by the fact that the appellant filed a petition seeking annulment of the marriage on the ground of cruelty in the year 1996. It was registered as HMA case No.239/1996.6. The appellant withdrew the same on September 01, 2001. Reason Mat.A.(F.C...
Jaiveer Srivastava vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA6532016 & CM Nos.43332-34/2016 JAIVEER SRIVASTAVA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mathew K., Ms. Smrithi Suresh, Mr. Deepak Grover and Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Mohita, Adv. for UOI Mr. Ritin Rai with Mr. Aabhas Kshetrapal, Advs. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER2211.2016 % CM Nos.43334/2016 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM No.43332/2016 This is an application filed by the appellant under Section 151 CPC seeking permission to bring the additional facts and documents on record. The same is allowed. Application stands disposed of. LPA No.653/2016 Page 1 of 3 LPA6532016 1. The challenge in this appeal is, to the order dated November 07, 2016 in W.P105302016 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed ...
Ami Lal & Ors vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :10. h November, 2016 Date of Decision:22. d November, 2016 CRL.A. 689/2000 AMI LAL & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. versus with Mr. M. Shamikh, Adv. STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, J1 The appellants before us assail the judgment dated 31st October, 2000 whereby Ami Lal, his wife Smt. Feroz @ Shanti and their daughter Anju were held guilty for commission of offences punishable under Section 498A and Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC in Sessions Case No.which arose out of FIR No.4registered under Section 498A/302 read with Section 34 IPC by the Police Station Kashmiri Gate. The appellants also assail the consequential order of sentence dated 2nd November, 2000 whereby the trial court sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.3,0...
Anandita Puri vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
$~66 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11071/2016 & CM No.43247/2016 Judgment delivered on:22. 11.2016 ANANDITA PURI ........ Petitioner versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. S.N. Khanna, Adv.. : Mr. Mr. Vaibhav Kalra and Ms. Neha Bhatnagar, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Standing Counsel with Ms. Simran Jeet, Adv. for DU CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.43248/2016 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 11071/2016 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a direction to the respondents not to cancel the provisional admission of the petitioner to the MBA Programme due to non submission of the result of the B.Com (Final Year). The petitioner was granted provisional admission to the MBA Programme because the result of the qualifying W.P.(C) No.1...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »