Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vinod Kumar Malhotra vs.virender Prakash Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA8252016 VINOD KUMAR MALHOTRA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Jaykant Prasad, Advocate with appellant in person. versus VIRENDER PRAKASH ANAND Through : Ms. Neha Garg, Advocate with respondent in person. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2111.2016 CM No.38763/2016 (for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal) 1. This application is filed by the appellant praying inter alia for condonation of delay of 16 days in re-filing the accompanying appeal.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 16 days in re-filing the accompanying appeal is condoned.3. The application is disposed of. CM No.38762/2016 (for condonation of delay) 1. This application is filed by the appellant praying inter alia for condonation of delay of 46 days in filing the accompanying appeal.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 46 days in filing the accompanying appe...
Union of India and Ors. Vs.javed Ahmed and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
$~33 * + W.P.(C) 10995/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :21. t November, 2016 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ashok Singh, Advocate for UOI versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through JAVED AHMED AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) CM No.43001/2016 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10995/2016 and CM No.43002/2016 (Stay)1) Having heard learned counsel for the Union of India and the General Manager, Northern Railway, we are inclined to uphold the impugned order dated 01.09.2016 whereby the OA13862013 filed by the respondent has been allowed.2) The respondents were appointed as Mistries in the pay scale of Rs.1400-2300 and were promoted to the post of Junior Engineer prior to 1998. These two posts were then in the identical pay scale of Rs. 1400-2300.3) In 1998, the scale of Junior Engineers was revised and rais...
Archana Chugh & Anr vs.g S Moondhra & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2016
$~7 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 538/2016 & CRL.M.No.13111/2016 ARCHANA CHUGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.APS Ahluwalia, Sr.Advocate with Mr.S.S.Ahluwalia, Advocate. versus G S MOONDHRA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Randhir Jain with Mr.Dhananjai Jain and Mr.Bhoop Singh, Advocates for R-1. Mr.R.A.Iyer with Ms.Shruthi P., Advocates for R-3/DOE. Date of Decision :18. h November, 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) The Director of Education-respondent no.3 is permitted to file the Status report within a period of one week. List on 16th January, 2017. C.M.No.42147/2016 1. Present application has been filed challenging the order dated 21st October, 2010 by which the petitioner No.1s services have been terminated on the ground that the respondent-school had discontinued CONT. CAS (C) 538/2016 Page 1 of 5 the subject of Biology in classes 11th and 12th and the petitioner had become surplus.2. Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia...
Sushil Kumar Bhati & Anr vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2016
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order : November 18, 2016 BAIL APPLN. 2338/2016 & Crl.M.A. No.17864/2016 (Interim relief) SUSHIL KUMAR BHATI & ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Ms. Sarita Bhatia, Mr. Sandeep Singh, Ms. Nasima, Ms. Shailja Jha, Advocates versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Inspector C.B. Singh, Sub-Inspector Brij Mohan, Police Station M.S. Park, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI % ORDER P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.0123/2016, Police Station M.S. Park, under Sections 498A/406/353/506/3of the Indian Penal Code.2. The petitioner has filed an application for seeking anticipatory Bail. Appln. No.2338/2016 Page 1 of 5 bail before the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, which was...
Md. Ayub vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi ) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h November, 2016 CRL.REV.P. 432/2016 & Crl.M.B. 1173/2016 MD. AYUB ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Mrinal Madhav, Mr. Kaushikesh Kumar, Mr. Shashi Bhushan Thakur, Advs. Versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with Insp. Virender Singh Punia, ASI Ram Briksh PS Kalkaji Metro. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 31st May, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge upholding the impugned judgment dated 19th February, 2015 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate and order on sentence of the even date directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for offence punishable under Section 354 IPC.2. Process of law was set into motion on 2nd February, 2013 on receipt of DD Entry 26 by PW-3 ASI Ram Briksh. On reaching Central...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.vandana Kumari & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2016
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:18. h November, 2016 + MAC.APP. 751/2016 and C.M. Appl. 33429/2016 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Adv. Versus VANDANA KUMARI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS No.1 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.14,64,826/- has been awarded to claimants/respondents No.1 to 6.2. The accident dated 28th May, 2009 resulted in the death of Mukesh Kumar. The deceased was aged 24 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his widow, two minor children, parents and one dependent unmarried sister who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal.3. The Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of Rs.4,382/-, added 50% towards inflation, deducted 1/4th towards personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 18 to compute t...
Attar Singh vs.the Addl Commissioner of Police and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2016
$~6 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2016 % + W.P.(C) 8750/2016 and CM No.35871/2016 ATTAR SINGH ........ Petitioner THE ADDL COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. V.K. Dwivedi, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Ravi Chaturvedi with Ms. Renu Chauhan, Advocates for... RESPONDENTS 1 & 2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1811.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking setting aside of order dated 03.07.2015 passed by the DCP (Licensing) and order dated 23.09.2015 passed by the Court of Lieutenant Governor whereby the arms licence of the petitioner has been revoked and the appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act has been rejected, respectively.2. The petitioner was issued an arms licence on 27.11.2009 for a Double Barrel (12 bore gun) from the District of Etta, U.P. The gun W.P.(C) No.8750/2016 Page 1...
Khushal Singh vs.registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2016
$~7. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.7975/2013 Date of decision:18. h November, 2016 KHUSHAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vinayak Mehrotra, Advocate. versus REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ANRRespondents Through Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC & Mr. Rizwan, Advocate for respondent No.1 alongwith Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, AR (RCS). Mr. B. Gopinathan, Secretary and authorised representative of respondent No.2, in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The petitioner- Khushal Singh, aged 75 years, is a retired school principal. He was enrolled as a member of the Daffodils Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd., respondent No.2 herein, in the meeting of the Management Committee held on 30.09.2000. By letter dated 13.11.2000, the petitioner was informed of the schedule of payment for the cost of flat. By 20.04.2001 the petitioner had paid the entire cost of Rs. 11,33,536/-...
Aura Synergy India Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.m/s New Age False Ceiling Co Pvt L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2016 FAO(OS) 177/2016 AURA SYNERGY INDIA PVT LTD & ORS versus M/S NEW AGE FALSE CEILING CO PVT LTD & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants ... Appellants ...... RESPONDENTS : Mr Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Mr Harsh Kaushik, Mr Abhay Chattopadhyay and Gaurav Sharma : Mr Saif Khan with Mr Manish Biala For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM223292016(condonation of delay) The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) 177/2016 & CM223302016 & CM223312016 1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and/or order dated 10.02.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby he has dismissed IA230952015, being an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, filed by the appellants/plaintiffs and allowed FAO(OS) 177/2016 Page...
Sukhbir Singh Thr His Lrs vs.m/s Scindia Potteries & Services Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2016
$~ 11 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 18, 2016 RSA862016 SUKHBIR SINGH THR HIS LRS ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anuj Kumar Garg, Advocate with Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocates. versus M/S SCINDIA POTTERIES & SERVICES PVT LTD ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Virender Kumar Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) 1. This Regular Second Appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree dated January 27, 2016 whereby the learned ADJ-01 (West), Tis Hazari Courts dismissed RCA No.03/2013 filed by the appellant questioning the legality of the judgment and decree passed on November 26, 2012. The decree for possession passed by learned Trial Court in respect of the Quarter No.36, Scindia Potteries, Labour Quarters Complex, Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi has been affirmed by the First Appellate Court.2. Civil Suit No.663/2010 was filed by M/s Scindia Potteries and Services Pvt. Ltd. against Sukhbir Singh, now represented through...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »