Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.ahmad Hussain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:02. d November, 2016 $~27 * % + MAC.APP. 1105/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AHMAD HUSSAIN & ORS. Versus Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: Mr. N.K. Jha, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal 1. whereby compensation of Rs.5,95,968/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 and 2. The accident dated 09th August, 2011 resulted in the death of 2. Mohd. Wakil. The deceased was 19 years old at the time of accident and was survived by his parents who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. The deceased was carrying on the business of supplying chickens. It was claimed that the deceased was earning Rs.9,000/- per month. The Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of Rs.6,422/-, added 30% towards inflation, deducted 50% towards personal expenses and applied the mul...
Mr. Suresh Kumar Mahajan vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
* + % RSA No.326/2016 MR. SURESH KUMAR MAHAJAN IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI2d November, 2016 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.P. Pathak, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA Through: To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.40606/2016 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. +RSA No.326/2016 2. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(CPC) is filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the Judgment of the First Appellate Court dated 20.7.2016 by which the first appellate court set aside the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 17.11.2012 by which the trial court had decreed the suit for mandatory injunction filed RSA No.326/2016 Page 1 of 10 by the appellant/plaintiff and directed the respondent/defendant to make allotment of flat no.167 or similar flat in 288 MIG Houses Pocket-2, Sector- 23, Rohini,...
Shri Niwas vs.delhi Development Authority & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25 & 26 * + W.P.(C) 4677/2016 SHAMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun versus Khanna, Advocates. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Ms.Sakshi Popli, Advocate for R- 2/SDM Punjabi Bagh. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 4741/2016 RAJENDER KUMR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Mr.Gaurav Varma, Advocate for R-2. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 12115/2015 PYARE LAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. Page 1 of 9 W.P.(C) 4677/2016 & Ors. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika...
Anil Kumar Katarmal vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 02, 2016 + FAO4382016 ANIL KUMAR KATARMAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shaad Anwar, Advocate versus THE STATE & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Aayushi Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Raman Duggal, Standing Counsel of GNCT (Civil) for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) C.M.No.32638/2016 (delay) There is delay of 143 days in filing the accompanying appeal. The reason put forth for the delay occasioned is that appellant had tried his best to arrange a surety for a sum of `49 lacs odd, but he could not find one and so, this resulted in the delay in filing the instant appeal. The averments made in paragraphs No.3 to 5 of the instant application provide sufficient cause for the delay occasioned. The application is allowed and the delay stands condoned. Page 1 of 4 FAO4382016 The application stands disposed of. FAO4382016 Impugned order of 13th January, 2016 grants Letter of Administratio...
Delhi Gliding Club vs.airports Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
$~6 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2194/2016 & CM No.9414/2016, 29316/2016 Judgment delivered on:02. 11.2016 DELHI GLIDING CLUB versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. K.C. Mittal with Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Digvijay Rai, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.9415/2016 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2194/2016 1. The petitioner impugns the order dated 15.02.2016 passed by the Airport Appellate Tribunal at Safdarjung Airport in so far as it relates to Appeal No.16/CP/A-80/2015 rejecting the appeal of the petitioner against the eviction order dated 05.11.2015.2. It may be noted that the said order also deals with Appeal No.15/CP/A-80/2015 whereby the appeal of the petitioner, impugning the order of the Eviction Officer under the Airports Authority of Ind...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›