Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jaspal Singh vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : OCTOBER06 2016 DECIDED ON : NOVEMBER16 2016 + AND + CRL.REV.P. 160/2016 & CRL.M.B. 18JASPAL SINGH Through : Mr.Sajan K.Singh, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Kamal K.Ghei, APP. Mr.Dinesh Priani, Advocate with Mr.Bishan Dass, Advocate for R2. CRL.REV.P. 162/2016 & CRL.M.B. 18JASPAL SINGH & ANR Through : Mr.Sajan K.Singh, Advocate. ........ Petitioners Versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Kamal K.Ghei, APP. Mr.Dinesh Priani, Advocate with Mr.Bishan Dass, Advocate for R2. Crl.Rev.P.Nos.1& 1Page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Cri.Rev.P.160/2016 and Crl.Rev.P.162/2016 have been preferred by the petitioner(s) to challenge the legality and correctness of judgments dated 22.08.2015 of learned District and Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.58/2015 and Crl.A.No.57/2015 by which the conviction and ...
Oriental Insurance Company vs.ishrawti & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~R-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 16, 2016 + MAC.APP. 333/2009 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY Through: Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate ..... Appellant versus .....Respondents Through: Nemo ISHRAWTI & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 15th May, 2009 grants compensation of `12,53,820/- with interest to the legal heirs of deceased-Bechu Prasad aged 52 years, who had sustained fatal injuries in a road accident on 22nd November, 2003. At the time of the accident, the deceased was working as a Head Constable in Delhi Police and was earning around `10,000/- per month. The factual background of this case is not in dispute and hence, it needs no reproduction. Learned counsel for appellant submits that contesting respondents MAC.APP. 333/2009 Page 1 of 4 No.1 to 4 and 7 & 8 are duly represented and it is so evident from the last order. The power of attorney/vakalatnama of learned counsel for contesting respondent is not ...
Mohd Naser Packeer vs.national Investigation Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:16. h November, 2016 CRL.A. 642/2016 MOHD NASER PACKEER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.S. Khan, Adv. versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Abhishek Bagaria, SPP, Ms. Rajul Jain and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, J Crl.M.A.No.10879/2016 Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, we are satisfied that the appellant was prevented from sufficient cause from filing the appeal belatedly. Therefore, delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned and the application is allowed. CRL.A. 642/2016 1. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 21(4) of the National Investigating Agency Act, 2008 Crl. A. 642/2016 Page 1 of 5 (NIA Act hereafter) assailing an order dated 8th April, 2016 passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge, Special Court (NIA), New...
Ct. Dashrath and Ors vs.commissioner of Police & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
#9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 7376/2013 & CM APPL. 15838/2013, 22297/2015 CT. DASHRATH AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Advocate % versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Mr. Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate for Delhi Police/R-1 & 2. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for DDA/R-3. Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Ms. Sona Babbar, Advocate for PWD/R-4. Date of Decision:16. h November, 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. The present writ petition had been filed raising a grievance that flats given to Delhi Police officials at Dwarka, Sector-13, Phase-I and Phase-II, New Delhi in Type B(II) were dilapidated. CONT.CAS(C) 7376/2013 Page 1 of 6 2. On 6th May, 2014, this Court had passed a detailed order. The relevant portion of the said order is reproduced hereinbelow:-"Learned counsel for petitioner refers to the photographs on...
Subhash Chandra vs.punjab National Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
* + % SUBHASH CHANDRA IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.5932/2012 16th November, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Bhalla, Advocate with Mr. I.P. Singh, Advocate. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner/Sh. Subhash Chandra against his employer/respondent no.1/Punjab National Bank seeking various reliefs which are in fact basically for grant of promotion to the petitioner as a Scale IV officer from the present Scale III post to which the petitioner was appointed/promoted w.e.f 15.1.2001. By the writ petition and the reliefs prayed therein, the petitioner firstly seeks quashing of the Order dated 6.1.2012 passed by the respondent no.1/employer/bank rejecting the representation of the petitioner to review the earlier appellate de...
Abu Anas & Ors vs.national Investigation Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:16. h November, 2016 CRL.A. 602/2016 ABU ANAS & ORS Through: Mr. M.S. Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Abhishek Bagaria, SPP, Ms. Rajul Jain and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. + CRL.A. 607/2016 MOHD. NAFEES KHAN & ANR Through: Mr. M.S. Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Abhishek Bagaria, SPP, Ms. Rajul Jain and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. App.No.642/2016 Page 1 of 9 GITA MITTAL, J Crl.M.A.Nos.10425/2016 & 10504/2016 Heard. For the reasons stated in the applications, we are satisfied that the appellants were prevented from sufficient cause from filing the appeals belatedly. Therefore, delay in filing the appeals is hereby condoned and the applications are allowed. C...
Rajbir Singh vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~R-9. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2320/2002 % Judgment dated 16.11.2016 RAJBIR SINGH Through : Mr.Shanker Raju and Mr.Nilansh Gaur, ........ Petitioner Advs. along with petitioner. versus CORAM: UOI & ORS. Through : Mr.Satyakam, ASC. ASI Baljeet Singh. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Rule DB was issued on 13.05.2002.2. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227of the Constitution of India against the order dated 9.5.2001 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) whereby OA No.617/2000 filed by the petitioner herein was dismissed by the Tribunal primarily on the ground of limitation.3. The brief facts of this case are that the petitioner joined Delhi Police as a Constable on 4.9.1978. On account of his unauthorised absence from service, DD67dated 3.2.1988 was recorded. Thereafter a Departmental Enquiry was initiate...
Kamla Latwal vs.glorious Stylings and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~40 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h November, 2016 + W.P.(C) 6955/2012 KAMLA LATWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Monica Kapoor, Adv. versus GLORIOUS STYLINGS AND ANR Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the award passed by the learned Labour Court whereby the petitioner has been awarded compensation of Rs.25,000/- in lieu of reinstatement and back wages. The petitioner worked with the respondents as Hand Worker 2. from 03rd March, 1991 up to 12th March, 2007 when her service was terminated, whereupon the petitioner raised an industrial dispute which was referred to the Labour Court. The respondents filed the written statement in which they set up 3. the defence that they terminated the petitioners service after fair inquiry as the petitioner had gone on an illegal strike since August, 2003. However, the respondents stopped appearing before the Labour Court and w...
Shri Ankur Verma vs.lic Nomura Mutual Fund Asset Management Co. Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
* + % SHRI ANKUR VERMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.6590/2015 16th November, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Soumo Palit, Advocate. versus LIC NOMURA MUTUAL FUND ASSET MANAGEMENT CO. LIMITED & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner Mr. Ankur Verma seeking quashing of the Letter dated 21.5.2014 issued by the respondent No.1/M/s. LIC Nomura Mutual Fund Asset Management Company Limited whereby the petitioners probationary services were terminated.2. The petitioner was appointed by the respondent no.1 on probation in terms of its Letter dated 28.2.2013. Paragraphs 3, 4, 7, 11, 13, W.P.(C) No.6590/2015 Page 1 of 15 15, 17, 18 and 19 of this appointment Letter dated 28.2.2013 are relevant and the same are reproduced as under:-"You will be o...
Ajay Kumar Mann vs.tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. (Tpddl)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4176/2015 AJAY KUMAR MANN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Bishwambhar D. Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate. versus TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD. (TPDDL)..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA % C.M. No.7566/2015 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. ORDER1611.2016 C.M. stands disposed of. +W.P.(C) No.4176/2015 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner who is an employee of the respondent seeks the relief of being granted benefits of seniority and promotion w.e.f 1.7.2013. The case of the petitioner is that merely because an FIR No.287/1999 was pending, and which is over 15 and half years old at the time of filing of the writ petition, the petitioner cannot be denied service W.P.(C) No.4176/2015 page 1 of 3 benefits including of seniority and promotion in view of the circular of the Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Pub...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »