Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr Manjula Pathak Krippendorf vs.anand Prakash & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. 08.2016 Pronounced on:23. 11.2016 TR.P.(C.) 68/2016 DR MANJULA PATHAK KRIPPENDORF ANAND PRAKASH & ANR versus Through Through Mr.Sajan Narain, Adv. ..... Respondent petitioner in person ........ Petitioner CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present petition is filed under section 24(b) CPC seeking to transfer the suit filed by the respondent form the Court of District Judge/South to the appropriate court of District Judge/South East.2. The respondents have filed a suit for permanent injunction to restrain the petitioner from entry and ingress into the property B-56, Defence Colony, New Delhi through the external gates etc. The suit was originally filed in the High Court.3. As per the Transfer Petition filed by the petitioner it is stated that on 29.4.2016 an application was adjucated under Order VII Rule 11 CPC regarding the jurisdiction of the Court to hear the matter. It is further stated that t...
Jai Prakash Alias Guddu vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct) of New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
+* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.609/2016 Judgment reserved on :9. h November, 2016 Date of decision :23. d November , 2016 Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma, Adv. JAI PRAKASH alias GUDDU THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF NEW DELHI versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Addl.P.P. for the State with SI Surender from PS Begumpur CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. An appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Cr.P.C.,1973 has been instituted by the appellant Jai Prakash @ Guddu son of Sh. Hari Nath against the impugned judgment dated 11.03.2016 and impugned order on sentence dated 16.03.2016 of the learned ASJ-02 North West, Rohini in State Case No.28/2014 in relation to FIR No.116/2014, P.S. Begumpur. The accused therein i.e the present appellant was convicted thereby for the commission of the offences punishable under Sectionof the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC), 1860.2. The...
Saswat Door Devices vs.commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax Sett ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~4 to 6 & 8 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2016 + (5) + (6) + (8) + (9) + W.P.(C) 8712/2016, CM APPL. 35749/2016 DOOR DECO INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 10121/2016, CM APPL. 40111/2016 JAURASIA HINGES & SCREWS ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 8998/2016, CM APPL. 36506/2016 AGGARWAL INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 9476/2016, CM APPL. 37887/2016 OM INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETILEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... R...
Nipun Malhotra vs.government of Delhi Nct Throgh: The Chief Secretary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
* + W.P.(C) 11711/2015 NIPUN MALHOTRA IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jai A. Dehadrai, Adv. with Ms. Shivangini Gupta, Adv. versus GOVERNMENT OF DELHI NCT THROGH: THE CHIEF SECRETARY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO % 1. ORDER2311.2016 In this petition, the petitioner has sought the following prayers:-"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent to carve out an exception for the disabled to use their private vehicles on the proposed car-free/restricted days; (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent to (i) conduct a disability audit of all the public transportation facilities in New W.P.(C) No.11711/2015 Page 1 of 3 Delhi which are likely to be affected by the odd-even numbered vehicle ban an...
Aggarwal Industries vs.commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax Sett ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~4 to 6 & 8 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2016 + (5) + (6) + (8) + (9) + W.P.(C) 8712/2016, CM APPL. 35749/2016 DOOR DECO INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 10121/2016, CM APPL. 40111/2016 JAURASIA HINGES & SCREWS ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 8998/2016, CM APPL. 36506/2016 AGGARWAL INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 9476/2016, CM APPL. 37887/2016 OM INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETILEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... R...
Shri Ram General Insurance Co Ltd &Ors vs.soni & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~28 to 31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 23, 2016 (i) + MAC.APP. 260/2016 SONI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.1-insurance company (ii) + MAC.APP. 357/2016 PINKU @ SAMRUIT RANJAN DASH versus Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate ..... Appellant SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD &ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.1-insurance company (iii) + MAC.APP. 495/2015 & C.M.11356/2015 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate ..... Appellant versus MAC APPs.260/16, 357/16, 4& 4Page 1 of 10 SONI & ORS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate for .....Respondents (vi) + MAC.APP. 497/2015 & C.M.11364/2015 respondent-claimant SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate ..... Appellant versus PINKU @ SAMRUTI DASH & ORS .....Respondents Through: M...
Shusheela Kumari vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11026/2016 SHUSHEELA KUMARI Through Ms. Sonia A. Menon, Advocate Date of Decision :23. d November, 2016 ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sanjay Dewan and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates for R-3 & R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) CM Nos.43089/2016 and 43090/2016 1.2. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 11026/2016 & CM No.43088/2016 1. Having heard counsel for the petitioner we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned dated 30.08.2016 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench dismissing OA No.2017/2015 and the order dated 30.09.2016 dismissing RA No.214/2016.2. The petitioner is employed as a Librarian with the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi. She works as a Librarian in their schools. WP(C) No.11026/2016 Page 1 of 6...
Harjit Kaur vs.surinder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
$~R-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : November 22, 2016 + MAT.A.(F.C)No.107/2015 HARJIT KAUR .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.Abhinav Bajaj, Advocate with Appellant in person versus .....Respondent SURINDER SINGH Represented by: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.(Oral) Sometimes it become necessary to enquire from what motive a 1. behaviour ensues. If the cause for the behaviour of a spouse is the result of breach of faith by the other spouse, and especially where the trust of fidelity is breached, it becomes the duty of the court to be more vigilant and appraise the evidence led at the trial with a hawks eye. Sieving the evidence and then examining it under a microscope.2. The appeal has reached for hearing today and none appears for the respondent. The reason is obvious. During the subsistence of the marriage he had an extra-marital relationship with one Ms.IK (name withheld). As a result ...
Krishna Saini & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10135/2015 & CM249502015 Judgment delivered on:22. 11.2016 KRISHNA SAINI & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....... Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the Respondent UOI For the Respondent L&B For the Respondent DDA : Ms Richa Oberoi : Mr V.P. Singh Charak with Ms Shubhra Parashar : Mr Siddharth Panda : Ms Mrinalini Sen with Ms Kritika Gupta CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of w...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.v.d. Chawla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :22. 11.2016 + W.P.(C) 3630/2015 & C.M. No.6477/2015 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION........ Petitioner Through Ms.Madhu Tewatia, Advocate. versus V.D. CHAWLA ...... Respondent Through Mr.S.K.Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(oral) 1... Petitioner before this Court is the SDMC. It is aggrieved by the order dated 22.01.2014 passed by the Municipal Taxation Tribunal. By this common order 9 appeals had been decided. 2 Facts at the outset disclose that this dispute relates to the determination of the annual value under the Unit Area system of the property tax which was for the Assessment Years 2004-05 to 2012-13. The averments in the petition disclose that the petitioner had been issued a show cause notice dated 12.10.2012 under Sections 123-D of W.P.(C) 3630/2015 Page 1 of 8 the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 notifying the respondent to produce relevant evidence/documents to...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »