Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
L & T Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5350/2014 Date of Decision: November 17th, 2016 ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ANS ORS ...Petitioners Through Mr. Mudit Sharma, Mr. Tanmaya Nirmal, Advocates for petitioners no.1 to 15 versus NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for the State with Sub Inspector Ashutosh, EOW, Mr. Ranjana Roy Gawai, Mr. Abhey P.Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2 W.P.(CRL) 71/2011 J P NAYAK & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Sunil Sethi, Advocate versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal) for the State Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Pavan Narang, Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan, Advocate for the complainant W.P.(CRL) 72/2011 L & T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS ........ Petitioner W.P.(CRL) & 72/11, Crl.M.C. 53Page 1 of 9 STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Sunil Sethi, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS ...
Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors vs.babu Lal Bunkar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 779/2014 & CM APPL. 1561/2014 (Stay) Date of Decision :17. h November, 2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus BABU LAL BUNKAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. M. R. Sinha, Advocate CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) 1. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the Delhi Transport Corporation (petitioner-Corporation for short) and perused the order dated 06.09.2013 whereby the OA No.2336/2012 filed by Babu Lal Bunker have been allowed.2. The petitioner corporation has been directed to consider the respondents case for regularisation against direct quota vacancies to a post for which he is medically suited. The Tribunal has also asked the corporation to prepare a scheme which would not operate or be applicable as a general precedence but will be applicable particularly in this case. The directions were to ...
M/S Kohli Traders vs.the Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing Committe ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
$~168. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10898/2016 and CM APPL. 42700-42701/2016 1. M/S KOHLI TRADERS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kishan Choudhary, Advocate with Mr. Vineet Jindal, Advocate versus THE DELHI AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE & ANR Through: Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER1711.2016 for quashing of a public notice dated 21.11.2016 issued by the respondents giving a notice for the election of the members of Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board. Further, the petitioner seeks quashing of the final electoral list dated 02.11.2016 on the ground that his name has been wrongly deleted from the said list.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have deliberately excluded the name of the petitioner from the fresh electoral list without any proper verification and since the list ha...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.pale Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA - 257/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Appellant Reserved on:17. 10.2016 Decided on :17. 11. 2016 Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate Versus PALE RAM Through: Mr. Sanjay Ghose and Mr. ..... Respondent Rhishabh Jatley, Advocates % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT :SUNITA GUPTA J.1. The Delhi Transport Corporation in this Letters Patent Appeal impugns the judgment dated 5th February, 2016 whereby W.P.(C) No.8185/2004 filed by the appellant challenging and assailing the Award dated 27th May,2003 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, has been dismissed.2. The respondent- Pale Ram was employed as a conductor with the appellant Corporation. On 30th August, 1991, he was chargesheeted for failure to issue tickets to three groups of passengers who had paid full fares on 14th July, 1991 on board Bus No.DL-1P-9032 from Patiala to Delhi route for refusal to sign on statements of passengers, refusal t...
Karan Chopra & Ors vs.state of Nct (Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1774/2016 & Crl.M.A. No.7531/2016 Date of Decision: November 17th, 2016 KARAN CHOPRA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Vipin Kumar, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT (DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.G.M. Farooqui, APP for the State ASI Mahender Parkash, PS Mianwali Nagar. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Karan Chopra, Smt. Brahm Lata, Smt. Menka Sachdeva, Ms. Nisha Chopra and Sh. Ashok Chopra for quashing of FIR No.493/2014 dated 13.07.2014, under Sections 498- A/4IPC registered at Police Station Mianwali Nagar on the basis of a settlement arrived at between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Isha Manga before Ms. Himali Anand, Ld. Principal Counselor, (West) Tis Hazari Court, Delhi on 11.03.2015.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court ha...
Wasim Khan vs.the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
I-32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: November 17, 2016 + MAC.APP. 231/2008 WASIM KHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Gahlot, Advocate Versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur & Mr. Amit Gaur, Advocates for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 4th January, 2008 directs payment of compensation of `4,75,816/- with interest on account of death of Dev Dutt Joshi, aged about 35 years, in a road accident on 26th November, 1999. The appellant was driving the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner, due to which Dev Dutt Joshi, a Fabric Checker was hit by the offending vehicle while he was crossing the road near round about at Akbar Road, New Delhi.2. Appellant is driver of offending vehicle, who assails the impugned Award on the ground that the recovery rights have been erroneously granted to respondent-insurer on the premise that appellant was holding MA...
Nirmal Anand & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2486/2016 Date of Decision: November 17th, 2016 NIRMAL ANAND & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Gaurav Dubey, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. Mr.Rakesh Rajmurti, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Smt. Nirmal Anand, Sh. Vijay Kumar Manchanda and Sh. Vikram Manchanda for quashing of FIR No.182/2016 dated 20.04.2016, under Sections 406/420/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Sadar Bazar on the basis of settlement arrived at before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi between the petitioners and respondent no.2 namely, Sh. Mohit Manchanda on 02.06.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant in the FIR in question by his counsel.3. The fa...
Ritu Raj Basant vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~1 * + W.P.(C) 1785/2016 and CM APPL7634/2016 (Stay) Date of Decision :17. h November, 2016 RITU RAJ BASANT ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Anand, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Puneeet Taneja and Mr. Shaheen Advocate for BSNL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner Ritu Raj Basant is an employee of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL). Having qualified the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination held on 04.03.2012, he was offered promotion as Sub Divisional Engineer and posted in North East I Circle, on tenure posting for two years.2. By the promotion and posting office order dated 02.07.2013, all officers promoted as Sub Division Engineer were asked to join their promotional postings within the prescribed period of 40 days or they would not be relieved or allowed to join thereafter. Their promotional orders shall become ...
Bumihiway(m)sdn,bhd vs.national Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EX.P. 68/2015 BUMIHIWAY(M)SDN,BHD ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr Debasish Moitra, Advocate. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through ..... Judgement Debtor CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1711.2016 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The above captioned petition has been filed for enforcement of an arbitral award dated 10.04.2012. According to the Judgement Debtor (hereafter 'NHAI'), it has duly satisfied the award as it has paid all sums awarded to the Decree Holder (hereafter 'BMS'). However, BMS claims that it is also entitled to future interest on the pre-award interest awarded by the arbitral tribunal. Thus, the only question that remains to be considered in this petition is whether the BMS is entitled to future interests on the pre- award interest awarded by the arbitral tribunal, in terms of Section 31 (7) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act').2. BMS had raised various claims before the ar...
Aayush Giri & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2431/2016 AAYUSH GIRI & ORS Date of Decision: November 17th, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through Mr.H.S. Gautam, Adv. Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Aayush Giri, Sh. Rajbir Giri, Smt. Seema Giri and Smt. Aashima Giri for quashing of FIR No.1475/2014 dated 01.12.2014, under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at Police Station Prashant Vihar on the basis of settlement arrived upon through Counseling Cell, Family Courts, Rohini, Delhi between the petitioner and respondent nos.2 Smt. Kaveri on 14.08.2015.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR in question by her counsel.3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the marriage of...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »