Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Harjit Singh & Ors vs.state of Govt of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2323/2016 Date of Decision: November 17th, 2016 ........ Petitioners HARJIT SINGH & ORS Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE OF GOVT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Manjeet Arya, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Deepak Kumar, Police Station, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Harjit Singh, Smt. Ram Pyari, Sh. Surjit Singh @ Sonu for quashing of FIR No.779/2007 dated 08.10.2007, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden on the basis of a Mediation Report of the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi settlement arrived at between petitioners and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Amarjeet Kaur on 30.01.2015. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be th...
s.n. Singh Rathore vs.director of Education and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
$~R-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI S.N. SINGH RATHORE Through: None. ........ Petitioner + W.P.(C) 8525/2003 versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA % 1. ORDER1711.2016 By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner/Sh. S.N. Singh Rathore impugns the judgment of the Delhi School Tribunal dated 11.2.2003 whereby Delhi School Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner and held that the petitioner has been rightly terminated from his services with the respondent No.2/Doon Public School in terms of the orders dated 25.12.1998 and 12.1.1999.2. The facts of the case are that petitioner was appointed as a Physical Education Teacher (PET) in the Assistant Teacher cadre with Doon Public School from 14.2.1992 in the pay scale of Rs. 1200-2040. The petitioners services were confirmed as per the W.P.(C) 8525/2003 Page 1 resolution of respondent No.2 school da...
J P Nayak & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5350/2014 Date of Decision: November 17th, 2016 ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ANS ORS ...Petitioners Through Mr. Mudit Sharma, Mr. Tanmaya Nirmal, Advocates for petitioners no.1 to 15 versus NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for the State with Sub Inspector Ashutosh, EOW, Mr. Ranjana Roy Gawai, Mr. Abhey P.Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2 W.P.(CRL) 71/2011 J P NAYAK & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Sunil Sethi, Advocate versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal) for the State Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Pavan Narang, Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan, Advocate for the complainant W.P.(CRL) 72/2011 L & T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS ........ Petitioner W.P.(CRL) & 72/11, Crl.M.C. 53Page 1 of 9 STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Sunil Sethi, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS ...
Kusum Lata Devi vs.municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 704/2012 Date of Decision:17th November, 2016 KUSUM LATA DEVI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma & Ms. Neha, Advocates Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Sachdeva & Ms. Shobha Gupta, Advocates for EDMC Mr. Satyakam, ASC for respondent No.5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The petitioner- Kusum Lata Devi, an Assistant Teacher with the respondent- Municipal Corporation of Delhi since 16th November, 1983, had applied, and was selected, for temporary promotion to the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) [Sanskrit]. with the Delhi Administration (now Government of NCT of Delhi).2. By letter dated 17th December, 1992 the petitioner was required to report for duty and join as TGT, latest by 30th December, 1992. Owing to WP(C) No.704/2012 Page 1 of 16 personal and family reasons, the petitioner, vide lette...
Deepak Kumar vs.office of the District and Sessions Judge (Hqs) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % DEEPAK KUMAR W.P.(C) No.1249/2016 17th November 2016 Through: Mr. Satyajit Sarna, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioner OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (HQs) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate for R Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Sona Babbar, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/Sh. Deepak Kumar seeks the relief for being granted a technical resignation by the respondent no.1/employer/Office of District & Sessions Judge so that petitioner can join the services with the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (in short SDMC) as a Primary Teacher and to which post petitioner stands selected.2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) with t...
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. Ans Ors vs.nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5350/2014 Date of Decision: November 17th, 2016 ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ANS ORS ...Petitioners Through Mr. Mudit Sharma, Mr. Tanmaya Nirmal, Advocates for petitioners no.1 to 15 versus NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for the State with Sub Inspector Ashutosh, EOW, Mr. Ranjana Roy Gawai, Mr. Abhey P.Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2 W.P.(CRL) 71/2011 J P NAYAK & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Sunil Sethi, Advocate versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal) for the State Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Pavan Narang, Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan, Advocate for the complainant W.P.(CRL) 72/2011 L & T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS ........ Petitioner W.P.(CRL) & 72/11, Crl.M.C. 53Page 1 of 9 STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Sunil Sethi, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS ...
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd vs.suraj Pal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
% + MAC.APP. 584/2015 & CM No.13269/2015 SURAJ PAL & ORS versus HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. $~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. h November, 2016 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R1. Mr. Rohit Singha, Adv. for R2 and R3.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.12,33,272/- has been awarded to respondent No.1.2. The accident dated 23rd October, 2011 resulted in the death of Tarun. The deceased was aged 21 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his parents who filed the claim petition. The mother of the deceased expired during the pendency of the claim petition. The Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of Rs.6,656/-, added 50% towards future prospects, deducted 50% towards his personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 18 to compute the loss of dependency at M...
Mahinder Pal Singh vs.the Principal Lady Shree Ram College for Women a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.5590/2014 * + % MAHINDER PAL SINGH17h November, 2016 ........ Petitioner Mr. M. Taiyab Khan, Advocate. Through: versus THE PRINCIPAL LADY SHREE RAM COLLEGE FOR WOMEN AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Apporv Kurup, Advocate with Mr. A.C. Boxipatro, Advocate and Mr. Rohit Rathi, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indian, the petitioner who was a Safai Karamchari with the respondent no.1/Lady Shree Ram College for Women seeks relief of being granted benefits of service taking the petitioner to be regularized in service w.e.f 1.3.1971 and not w.e.f 1.1.1987 as has been done by the respondent W.P.(C) No.5590/2014 Page 1 of 6 no.1/college.... Petitioner also accor...
Sanjay Gandhi Animal Care Center vs.state of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2278/2016 Date of Decision: November 17th, 2016 SANJAY GANDHI ANIMAL CARE CENTER ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Aditya Singla and Mr.Satyam Thareja, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr.G.M. Farooqui, APP for the State. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sanjay Gandhi Animal Care Centre through Mr. Dilip Suri for quashing of FIR No.328/2013 dated 20.07.2013, under SectionsIPC registered at Police Station Alipur on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding executed between the petitioner and respondent no.2 namely, Sh. Genda Ram on 09.05.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant in the FIR in question by ASI Prem Chand.3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the compl...
Dheeraj Sharma & Anr vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2377/2016 Date of Decision: November 17th, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Pawan Sharma, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP. Mr.Ankur Bansal, Advocate for R-2. DHEERAJ SHARMA & ANR STATE & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI Learned Additional Public Prosecutor P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Dheeraj Sharma and Sh. Jagdish Raj Sharma for quashing of FIR No.85/2012 dated 23.05.2012, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Ranjit Nagar on the basis of a mediation report of the Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi between the petitioners and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Reena Sharma on 23.05.2015. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by SI Amit Tyagi.3. The factual matrix, in brie...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »